Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

lightest clinchers?

Started by oroboy · · Last activity · 23 posts · 2,225 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 December 2003
Last activity
18 December 2003
Original author
oroboy
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,225
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. what are the lightest clinchers out there?

  2. Quoted message said:

    Subject: lightest clinchers?
    From: oroboy [email hidden]
    Date: 12/13/03 6:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    American Classic. They're pricey though. Check out the website, www. amclassic.com

    Josh Zlotlow [email hidden] Sacramento, California Sacramento Golden Wheelmen www.sacgw.com

  3. oroboy said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    The lightest clincher what? Rims? Wheels? Tires?

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Tim McNamara

    Boroboy said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    The lightest clincher what? Rims? Wheels? Tires? [/B]

    rims and wheels, complete set. I've been looking at Topolino. they are a new company using carban and Kevlar. A pair of wheels weigh 1390 grams.

  5. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by oroboy
    rims and wheels, complete set. I've been looking at Topolino. they are a new company using carban and Kevlar. A pair of wheels weigh 1390 grams.


    Forgot to tell you, you can see them at www.topolinotech.com/index.html

  6. oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not the
    lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube. It is essentially a tubular with a ridge around
    either side to fit on the hook bead of the rim.

    I have been longing to try them but at ~$70 per, I don't think so.

    App

  7. [email hidden] (Appkiller) wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not the
    lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube. It is essentially a tubular with a ridge around
    either side to fit on the hook bead of the rim.

    I doubt it. Vittoria makes a (claimed) 130 gram clincher, and tubes can be found well under 100
    grams, to say nothing of 130 grams.

    -Owen

  8. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Joshua Zlotlow
    >Subject: lightest clinchers?

    Quoted message said:

    From: oroboy [email hidden]
    Date: 12/13/03 6:42 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?



    American Classic. They're pricey though. Check out the website, www. amclassic.com

    Josh Zlotlow [email hidden] Sacramento, California Sacramento Golden Wheelmen www.sacgw.com


    Thanks Josh
    those look nice and they are lighter than the Topolinos I was looking at. Do you know if they are a strong wheel? And do they hold up well?
    thanx for the help
    jeff

  9. Appkiller said:

    oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not the
    lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube.

    If it's weight weenyism we're after, try Veloflex Record (130g) with a Continental latex tube (70g).
    But expect a fair few flats unless your road is guaranteed super clean.

    I use Veloflex Master (170g) instead, as a kind of insurance.

    /Robert

  10. oroboy said:
    Tim McNamara said:
    oroboy said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    Quoted message said:

    The lightest clincher what? Rims? Wheels? Tires?

    rims and wheels, complete set. I've been looking at Topolino. they are a new company using carban
    and Kevlar. A pair of wheels weigh 1390 grams.

    Well, if you really want the absolutey lightest clincher wheels then you'll need to shop around. LEW
    wheels, American Classic, Mavic, Bontrager, etc. all make light wheels. Seems like mostly nonsense
    to me, but it's your bike, your money and your ride. Ride whatcha like!

  11. oroboy said:
    Tim McNamara said:
    oroboy said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?


    The lightest clincher what? Rims? Wheels? Tires?

    Quoted message said:

    rims and wheels, complete set. I've been looking at Topolino. they are a new company using carban
    and Kevlar. A pair of wheels weigh 1390 grams.

    1390 grams can't be particularly low, as you can beat that by just buying some standard low-profile
    aluminium rims, light hubs (Tune, etc.) and thin spokes. Although I don't know the price of the
    wheels you mentioned, having a pair built from standard parts would likely be cheaper and certanily
    more easily serviced.

    -as

  12. Veloflex Record clincher: 120 grams.

    --
    --------------------------
    Andre Charlebois BPE, MCSE4.0, CNA, A+ webmaster for Triathlon New Brunswick www.TriNB.com "Owen
    Pope" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (Appkiller) wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not
    the lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube. It is essentially a tubular with a ridge
    around either side to fit on the hook bead of the rim.

    I doubt it. Vittoria makes a (claimed) 130 gram clincher, and tubes can be found well under 100
    grams, to say nothing of 130 grams.

    -Owen

  13. In article <[email hidden]>,

    oroboy said:

    Joshua Zlotlow wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    American Classic. They're pricey though. Check out the website, www. amclassic.com

    Thanks Josh those look nice and they are lighter than the Topolinos I was looking at. Do you know
    if they are a strong wheel? And do they hold up well? thanx for the help jeff

    I have a set of the 350s. At roughly $500 they're cheaper than most top of the line wheels.

    They have held up fine for me, but I'm only 150 lbs.

    Unlike the topolinos, the AmClassic cr350s can be fixed by anyone if a spoke breaks since they use
    normal spokes.

    American Classic's recently announced a 300g magnesium rim.

    Eric

  14. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: lightest clinchers?
    From: oroboy [email hidden]
    Date: 12/14/03 1:46 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Joshua Zlotlow said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: lightest clinchers? From: oroboy usenet- [email hidden] Date: 12/13/03 6:42
    PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?


    American Classic. They're pricey though. Check out the website, www. amclassic.com Josh Zlotlow
    [email hidden] Sacramento, California Sacramento Golden Wheelmen www.sacgw.com

    Thanks Josh those look nice and they are lighter than the Topolinos I was looking at. Do you know
    if they are a strong wheel? And do they hold up well? thanx for the help jeff

    As far as the Magnesiums (supposedly 1207 grams per set), I have no idea, since I don't believe they
    are in production yet.

    The 350s got a good review on Cyclingnews.com. I only know one person who has a pair. I believe he's
    pretty happy with them, but then again he's about 6" tall and maybe 135 pounds, so I don't think he
    tests their durability very well. Josh Zlotlow [email hidden] Sacramento, California Sacramento
    Golden Wheelmen www.sacgw.com

  15. Quoted message said:

    oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    Appkiller said:

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not the
    lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube. It is essentially a tubular with a ridge around
    either side to fit on the hook bead of the rim.

    I have been longing to try them but at ~$70 per, I don't think so.

    A 210 gram tire plus a 65g tube is not unusual for regular clinchers nowadays, I guess I'm saying
    that at 260g for $80 that model isn't all that light. (This series starts at $38 which is moderate
    pricing now for a tire/tube replacement.)

    If you are a weight obsessed rider there's a 225gram model at $104.

    I haven't used the Tufo C Elite Jet TEW at 225 grams but it does seem like there's just not very
    much material. . .

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  16. "Tim McNamara" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    oroboy said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    The lightest clincher what? Rims? Wheels? Tires?

    Anyone thought about Velomax? I don't know weights...

    Mike

  17. "A Muzi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    what are the lightest clinchers out there?

    Appkiller said:

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not
    the lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube. It is essentially a tubular with a ridge
    around either side to fit on the hook bead of the rim.

    I have been longing to try them but at ~$70 per, I don't think so.

    A 210 gram tire plus a 65g tube is not unusual for regular clinchers nowadays, I guess I'm saying
    that at 260g for $80 that model isn't all that light. (This series starts at $38 which is moderate
    pricing now for a tire/tube replacement.)

    If you are a weight obsessed rider there's a 225gram model at $104.

    I haven't used the Tufo C Elite Jet TEW at 225 grams but it does seem like there's just not very
    much material. . .

    I don't know what quality control is like these days, but in the past, tires of the same type
    usually varied by an ounce or two. And you know that when quoting weights, they'll go through a
    batch to find the lightest ones. So if you go through a bin of those 225g tires, you'll probably
    find some that are that light, most are a bit heavier, and some are much (if you can call it
    that) heavier.

    As if it matters anyway...

    Matt O.

  18. Owen Pope said:

    [email hidden] (Appkiller) wrote in

    Quoted message said:

    If you're talking tires, it's probably be the Tufo tubular clincher. The tire is certainly not
    the lightest at ~260 gms but it doesn't take a tube. It is essentially a

    I doubt it. Vittoria makes a (claimed) 130 gram clincher, and tubes can be found well under 100
    grams, to say nothing of 130 grams.

    My Bontrager Superlight 700c X 18c-25c seem dependable in 23c tires and purportedly weigh 65 grams
    (according to the package).

    Quoted message said:

    -Owen


    --
    Rick Onanian

  19. "Eric M" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Joshua Zlotlow wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    American Classic. They're pricey though. Check out the website, www. amclassic.com

    Thanks Josh those look nice and they are lighter than the Topolinos I was looking at. Do you know
    if they are a strong wheel? And do they hold up well? thanx for the help jeff

    I have a set of the 350s. At roughly $500 they're cheaper than most top of the line wheels.

    They have held up fine for me, but I'm only 150 lbs.

    Unlike the topolinos, the AmClassic cr350s can be fixed by anyone if a spoke breaks since they use
    normal spokes.

    American Classic's recently announced a 300g magnesium rim.

    I'll sell you my Rolf Sestriere Ti wheels -- I don't remember the exact weight, but I think they're
    1400-something. They're almost new -- just a few hundred miles. They have Hugi-type hubs and normal
    DT spokes, so they can be serviced by anyone who knows what they're doing.

    Matt O.

  20. On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 06:56:26 GMT, "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    "A Muzi" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    oroboy <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >what are the lightest clinchers out there?


    Quoted message said:


    I don't know what quality control is like these days, but in the past, tires of the same type
    usually varied by an ounce or two. And you know that when quoting weights, they'll go through a
    batch to find the lightest ones. So if you go through a bin of those 225g tires, you'll probably
    find some that are that light, most are a bit heavier, and some are much (if you can call it
    that) heavier.

    As if it matters anyway...

    Matt O.


    I actually weighed a small sample of Tufo tubulars ( five ) that are supposed to 195 grams and they
    were all within ten grams of the stated weight. YMMV. .

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.