UK and Europe · Public discussion

Result!

Started by Simonb · · Last activity · 14 posts · 648 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
13 December 2003
Last activity
14 December 2003
Original author
Simonb
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
648
Views / 30 days
2
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Took bike into Hargroves in Southampton for a freehub body replacement, whereupon the mechanic
    discovered a crack in the forks. Not only is the work on the forks under warranty, but Specialized
    have replaced the forks with carbon ones!

    Long live the LBS!

    Woo hoo!

    -- Simonb

  2. Simonb said:

    Took bike into Hargroves in Southampton for a freehub body replacement, whereupon the mechanic
    discovered a crack in the forks. Not only is the work on the forks under warranty, but Specialized
    have replaced the forks with carbon ones!

    Everyone seems to have carbon forks these days. A colleague in the CTC told me I should really get
    carbon forks for my racing bike...but I think he was actually after a cheap deal on the nice 531
    forks it has at the moment.

    I'd rather have forks that matched the frame, and as someone who doesn't even ride with gloves in
    summer, road buzz isn't a major concern ;-)

  3. Zog The Undeniable said:

    Everyone seems to have carbon forks these days. A colleague in the CTC told me I should really get
    carbon forks for my racing bike...but I think he was actually after a cheap deal on the nice 531
    forks it has at the moment.

    I'd rather have forks that matched the frame, and as someone who doesn't even ride with gloves in
    summer, road buzz isn't a major concern ;-)

    Oh. I doubt these forks will match the frame as Specialized don't have any bikes in this colour this
    year. Probably why they're giving me carbon. I'm not complaining.

    -- Simonb

  4. Zog The Undeniable said:
    Simonb said:

    Took bike into Hargroves in Southampton for a freehub body replacement, whereupon the mechanic
    discovered a crack in the forks. Not only is the work on the forks under warranty, but
    Specialized have replaced the forks with carbon ones!

    Everyone seems to have carbon forks these days. A colleague in the CTC told me I should really get
    carbon forks for my racing bike...but I think he was actually after a cheap deal on the nice 531
    forks it has at the moment.

    I'd rather have forks that matched the frame, and as someone who doesn't even ride with gloves in
    summer, road buzz isn't a major concern ;-)

    Not that long ago, forks were *always* considered an integral part of a frame purchase. but today
    they are often an extra. Having ridden both carbon and steel forks i have found very little
    difference.

    Could it mainly a marketing ploy to get you to shell out more dosh?

    John B

  5. "JohnB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Zog The Undeniable said:
    Simonb said:

    Took bike into Hargroves in Southampton for a freehub body


    replacement,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    whereupon the mechanic discovered a crack in the forks. Not only is


    the work

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    on the forks under warranty, but Specialized have replaced the forks


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    carbon ones!

    Everyone seems to have carbon forks these days. A colleague in the CTC told me I should really
    get carbon forks for my racing bike...but I think he was actually after a cheap deal on the nice
    531 forks it has at the moment.

    I'd rather have forks that matched the frame, and as someone who doesn't even ride with gloves
    in summer, road buzz isn't a major concern ;-)

    Not that long ago, forks were *always* considered an integral part of a


    frame

    Quoted message said:

    purchase. but today they are often an extra. Having ridden both carbon and steel forks i have
    found very little


    difference.

    Quoted message said:


    Could it mainly a marketing ploy to get you to shell out more dosh?

    I'm always sceptical about the ability of marketers to get customers to shell out more cash than
    they would otherwise. I don't think most people are that gullible. They have enough demands on their
    money that they won't pay out good money for something that doesn't bring any benefit. The main
    benefit of carbon forks is lower weight.
    ___
    Michael MacClancy

  6. Michael MacClancy said:

    I'm always sceptical about the ability of marketers to get customers to shell out more cash than
    they would otherwise. I don't think most people are that gullible. They have enough demands on
    their money that they won't pay out good money for something that doesn't bring any benefit. The
    main benefit of carbon forks is lower weight.
    ___
    Michael MacClancy

    And that's the power of marketing. They got you, and you don't know it.

    The marginal weight difference that carbon forks might provide means bugger all in practical terms
    to most peoples bikes. That ain't a benefit, it's what the advertising mob want you to perceive as a
    benefit. Mission accomplished.
    --

    "Bob"

    Email address is spamtrapped.
    To reply directly remove the beverage.

  7. In "]news:[email hidden],
    Michael MacClancy <[email hidden]> typed:

    Quoted message said:


    I'm always sceptical about the ability of marketers to get customers to shell out more cash than
    they would otherwise. I don't think most people are that gullible. They have enough demands on
    their money that they won't pay out good money for something that doesn't bring any benefit. The
    main benefit of carbon forks is lower weight.

    Hmm, do £50000 cars get you there faster or any more comfortably than £15000 ones?

  8. Call me Bob said:

    The marginal weight difference that carbon forks might provide means bugger all in practical terms
    to most peoples bikes. That ain't a benefit, it's what the advertising mob want you to perceive as
    a benefit. Mission accomplished.

    But surely it's about cumulative weight? In which case, any weight saving is significant. Otherwise,
    why not ride around on over-sized, reinforced steel bikes as they'd prove much stronger.

    -- Simonb

  9. --------------030904060108020007020603
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Hmm, do £50000 cars get you there faster or any more comfortably than £15000 ones?


    A £50,000 car driven at 50 miles per hour will get you there faster than the £15,000 car driven at
    20 miles per hour. The multi zone air conditioning in the more expensive car will also enhance
    comfort levels and offer a less stressful drive - been there and done it!

    Vernon in Leeds, fully capable of making a lightweight trick framed high specced bike go faster than
    his £25 second hand Raleigh Equipe but unwilling to pay for the enhanced performance

    Quoted message said:

    --------------030904060108020007020603 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-
    Encoding: 7bit

    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title></title>
    </head> <body> <blockquote type="cite" cite="[email hidden]">
    <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""><!----> Hmm, do
    &pound;50000 cars get you there faster or any more comfortably than &pound;15000 ones? </pre>
    </blockquote> A &pound;50,000 car driven at 50 miles per hour will get you there faster than the
    &pound;15,000 car driven at 20 miles per hour. The multi zone air conditioning in the more
    expensive car will also enhance comfort levels and offer a less stressful drive - been there and
    done it!<br> <br> Vernon in Leeds, fully capable of making a lightweight trick framed high
    specced bike go faster than his &pound;25 second hand Raleigh Equipe but unwilling to pay for the
    enhanced performance<br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="[email hidden]-
    berlin.de"> <pre wrap="">

    </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html>

    --------------030904060108020007020603--

  10. "Ambrose Nankivell" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm, do £50000 cars get you there faster or any more comfortably than


    £15000

    Quoted message said:

    ones?


    Not always. But if you're into that kind of thing you'll probably justify the difference in price.
    (Leather seats, GPS, aircon, sports suspension, alloy wheels, better acceleration etc.) Another of
    the main benefits of driving a £50,000 car is showing people you can afford one - if you're into
    that kind of thing ;-).
    ___
    Michael MacClancy

  11. JohnB said:

    Not that long ago, forks were *always* considered an integral part of a frame purchase. but today
    they are often an extra. Having ridden both carbon and steel forks i have found very little
    difference.

    Wouldn't they be a bit stiffer than steel forks, so worse on the potholes? My aluminium hybrid is
    quite inflexible, apart from its forks which are steel and have the normal bend.

    - Richard

    --
    _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/ Richard dot Corfield at ntlworld dot com _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ Time is a
    one way street, _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/_/ Except in the Twighlight Zone.

  12. Ambrose Nankivell said:

    Hmm, do £50000 cars get you there faster or any more comfortably than £15000 ones?

    Me, I wait until the £50,000 car has depreciated to £15,000 (about six weeks) and get the best of
    both worlds ;-)

    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

  13. Just zis Guy said:


    Me, I wait until the £50,000 car has depreciated to £15,000 (about six weeks) and get the best of
    both worlds ;-)

    No, that Volvo was never worth £50k. £50k gives you leather, not acres of plastic ;-)

    Tony

  14. Tony Raven said:
    Quoted message said:

    Me, I wait until the £50,000 car has depreciated to £15,000 (about six weeks) and get the best of
    both worlds ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    No, that Volvo was never worth £50k. £50k gives you leather, not acres of plastic ;-)

    Ah, true enough. My last company car was a measly thirty grands' worth. Of Volvo estate, of course.
    With leather. And cruise. And climate control. And a computery thing. And CD whatnot. And stuff.

    I bought the current one second hand for 6k5 about six years ago. It started out at a Several of
    thousands, but I don't know how many at todays rates.

    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
    chapmancentral.demon.co.ukchapmancentral.demon.co.uk

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.