Spanish logic

Quoted message said:

With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
 Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
me."

ABS

Silly boy!

Kill first.

THEN the memorial, in another 20 years or so.

ms-se.comabstract.00005768 200606000 00005.htm;jsessionid=H1mLTvdPpKykq4WMv3jyzJDp1LhZnVNCvPKVQjjgJgJ6WlQq4nhOpen ↗

Quick, hand me a TINY, please:

http://tinyurl.com/2t3kw7

--D-y

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
me."

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
me."

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

There was a great lab during one period, doing experimental, top-
secret experimentation. Hush hush, and all that. Just a little too
secret and where they were lacking in technical help, people died.

Omerta Pharmaceuticals. They coulda been great.

(I think the responsibility of doctors is to do no harm, and maintain
patient confidentiality. Sugar plums and pixie dust.)

Happy New Year, MOS! --D-y

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
me."

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

i agree, EPO and blood doping should be covered under health
insurance.

poor joe papp couldn't afford the $30,000 a year fuentes charges and
had to stop racing.

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the
effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs
to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly
and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

i agree, EPO and blood doping should be covered under health
insurance.

poor joe papp couldn't afford the $30,000 a year fuentes charges and
had to stop racing.

Thanks for addressing the question raised.

On Dec 28, 5:18 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
me."

Quoted message said:

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

Quoted message said:

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

i agree, EPO and blood doping should be covered under health
insurance.

No worse than what's going on now. At least you're looking at things
from the other side?

Quoted message said:

poor joe papp couldn't afford the $30,000 a year fuentes charges and
had to stop racing.

Something to ponder, there. --D-y

Quoted post said:

On Dec 28, 5:18 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

On Dec 28, 4:32 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
> Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
> the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
> Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
> me."

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

Quoted message said:

i agree, EPO and blood doping should be covered under health
insurance.

No worse than what's going on now. At least you're looking at things
from the other side?

Quoted message said:

poor joe papp couldn't afford the $30,000 a year fuentes charges and
had to stop racing.

Something to ponder, there. --D-y

dumbass,

there isn't anything to ponder.

at the high end you can pay a doc the equivalent of a domestiques
salary and you have some security of not testing positive or a bad
side-effect (both would be bad for business).

at the low end riders are still procuring dope and using cavalierly
and risking a positive test or adverse side effect (ie. what happened
to joe papp).

In article <[email hidden]>,

Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:

<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

With much laughter I post this from CyclingNews:
Fuentes guessed at how his medical practices would be thought of in
the future, postulating, "Perhaps in 20 years they will give me the
Nobel Prize; maybe they will build me a memorial. Or they will kill
me."

The fact remains that a large number of Dutch cyclists died from the effects
of EPO. After Doctors started handling the doping the numbers of deaths
dropped dramatically.

What would you think the responsibility of Doctors would be? Do you think
that they should turn away athletes and allow them to die from ignorance
about drug use? Or that if they're looking for someone to prescribe drugs to
them properly they're probably going to use them properly or improperly and
it's better for a Doctor to handle it so that the athlete doesn't end up
killing himself accidentally?

I think that cyclists should continue to consult back-alley
physicians to prescribe and monitor the cyclists' doping
programs. One of the reasons that I think cyclists should
dope is so I can hear all the weak sisters squeal when
another athlete is "caught" doping.

--
Michael Press