Quoted message said:Can anyone out there recommend a "dual platform" seat?
My bikes have the traditional narrow seat and I'm experiencing the
typical nerve damage and pain to the point where I can't ride
anymore. I have a "road bike" and a "hybrid" touring bike.
Greatly appreciate a reply to [email hidden].
Thanking you in advance,
Trent
You could get a recumbent bike and avoid the problem pretty much
entirely. There are far fewer recumbent-bike dealers, the bikes tend to
be more expensive than a comparably-equipped upright and transporting
them can be a hassle, but the /riding/ is simply wonderful.
There's also the RANS crank-forward bikes that look more normal, but
that still have a nicer/larger seat. The RANS bikes use a special
seatpost and seat that cannot be exchanged for a typical saddle.
The general problems people see with mounting ergo seats on upright
bicycles is that the riders tend to slide forward off the seat. Some
ergo seats "fix" this problem by mounting farther-back than normal, but
then the rider is leaning over forward more, and that causes more
problems with hand numbness and neck strain.
There are a couple bikes that might benefit from ergo-style seats: the
Day6bicycles and the Lightfoot Surefoot. These appear to mount
conventional saddles and have a pedaling position that is far enough
forward that sliding forward off any type of seat shouldn't be a
problem, but I don't own either so I don't really know. They just give a
riding position that is very similar to the RANS bikes, which I do own
one of.
-----
As far as what you've got, you could try a wider seat, and play with the
tilt angle--but you're not likely to ever arrive at any combination
that's really "comfortable" to sit on. Bicycle saddles are generally so
uncomfortable that they aren't used for any other seat or vehicle. The
same people who insist they can be comfortable, usually cannot (or
refuse to try to) explain why "normal" bicycling-specific shorts have
padding in them and "recumbent" bicycling shorts don't.
~