UK and Europe · Public discussion

Wind your neck in...

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 199 posts · 4,939 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
1 October 2007
Last activity
7 October 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
199
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,939
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 199
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav charriot
    with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN notice
    attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a stop.

    Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    would have paid for a decent second hand car.

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways whilst promoting road safety so
    decide a traffic officer should examine the vehicle while we check
    young chavie's license. Up plods a RPU officer who promptly produces
    his tint-master and checks the front windscreen.

    "I ain't passing that"

    Starts checking the rest of the vehicle, apart from some duff
    lighting- reverse lights come on with the brakes and no fluid in the
    washers it's not bad.

    Said officer starts talking to the young chav. Now I didn't hear all
    that was said but I did hear - Don't swear at me and a standard
    warning about section 5.

    As we are listening to this exchange our PNC check comes back
    provisional license, well there's no L plates on it - is there... chat
    to girlfriend.

    Have you got a full license?

    Yes.

    Are you supervising the driver?

    No - he's passed his test.

    Do you know when?

    Couple of months ago.

    Hmmm only it's not shown at dvla.

    (Girlfriend)
    ****** you passed your test didn't you?

    Yea I told you.

    (Girlfriend)
    Well this copper says you haven't.

    Wander over to young chav and enquire about where and when and if he's
    got his new license yet. Oh yes he's got it at home.

    Well it's just the computer can't find any reference to you passing
    and only lists a provisional at the address you gave.

    When did you take the test?

    Couple of months ago

    March?

    Yea

    Are you sure you took the test there?

    Yes

    Were you living here when you passed the test?

    No

    Where were you living?

    xxxxxx

    So how long have you lived here?

    Three months.

    Hmmm that's not quite right is it?

    You'r confusing me.

    Traffic officer comes over - this is for you. Hands him a PG9 slip "I
    would have allowed you to drive it home but with your attitude your
    likely to crash it so you'll have to get it towed."

    .... Well I don't believe you've passed your test but I'll give you a
    chance to prove it. Issue HORT1. Now I'll need to see your insurance
    with this you have seven days from midnight etc...

    Never produces so eventually goes to magistrates where he gets the
    expected ban and £300 fine.

    Turns out yon mate from whom he purchased said vehicle had also had a
    PG9 but had declared the vehicle off road and then sold it on without
    telling said chavie mate who promptly got stopped - I mean it's going
    to with blacked out windows, spoiler and go faster stripes 'init'.

    An expensive evening.

    Sniper8052

  2. Quoted message said:

    Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav charriot
    with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN notice
    attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a stop.

    Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    would have paid for a decent second hand car.

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways

    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

  3. marc said:
    Quoted message said:

    Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav
    charriot with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN
    notice attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a
    stop. Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    would have paid for a decent second hand car.

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways

    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    Watch 'Road Wars' on Sky and I suspect the sort of attitude often shown
    there is what the OP is referring to....

  4. Quoted message said:

    ...
    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways...

    With your understanding of psychology, and of the how the "youth of
    today" have little respect "for authority", what do you think is the
    solution to harmony, and safety, on our streets?

    Do you think that the subject of your story will come out of this with a
    better understanding of his responsibilities, and with a better /attitude/?

    Do you think that he and, and more importantly, society as a whole, will
    benefit from his ban and fine?

    --
    Matt B


  5. Quoted message said:

    With your understanding of psychology, and of the how the "youth of
    today" have little respect "for authority", what do you think is the
    solution to harmony, and safety, on our streets?

    Do you think that the subject of your story will come out of this with a
    better understanding of his responsibilities, and with a better /attitude/?

    Do you think that he and, and more importantly, society as a whole, will
    benefit from his ban and fine?

    Slightly OT - but...

    I have a serious suggestion that I would like air; it involves the
    setting up of a penal colony in the Falkland Islands - similar to
    Australia or French Guyana from days of old.

    Violent, reckless, anti-social or otherwise serious nuisance citizens
    which demonstrate a clear and sustained propensity towards de-
    stabilizing our society should quite simply have access to that
    society removed.

    Pack 'em on a ship to the Falklands. 15-25 years labour should give
    them plenty of time to reflect on how society wasn't that bad after
    all. For those it doesn't reform - at least it takes them out of the
    equation for a very long time.

    Regards,

    Duncan

  6. cupra said:
    marc said:
    Quoted message said:

    Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav
    charriot with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN
    notice attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a
    stop. Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    would have paid for a decent second hand car.

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways


    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    Watch 'Road Wars' on Sky and I suspect the sort of attitude often shown
    there is what the OP is referring to....

    I have, it's medieval. If your a lickspittle you're sent on your way, if
    you don't kowtow you get nicked. There is no law that says " you must
    respect a policeman" so to make up for it the police use other powers.

  7. Duncan Smith said:

    I have a serious suggestion that I would like air; it involves the
    setting up of a penal colony in the Falkland Islands - similar to
    Australia or French Guyana from days of old.

    I don't want to get into a debate about the principle behind this
    proposition (and hence won't express my views on it) but I do question
    your choice of location...

    Have you ever been to the Falklands? It strikes me as a spectacularly
    unsuitable choice for such a scheme on a wide range of levels.

    Might be a bit OT for a cycling newsgroup, too. I don't recall a lot
    of opportunities for cycling there, although I'm sure the determined
    could find some. It'd be a bit of a challenge to get a bike there,
    too, as the transport arrangements arn't as flexible as most.

    Cheers,
    W.

  8. marc said:
    cupra said:
    marc said:

    [email hidden] wrote:
    > Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav
    > charriot with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN
    > notice attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a
    > stop. Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    > blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    > After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    > wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    > mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    > would have paid for a decent second hand car.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    > should be taught the error of his ways
    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    Quoted message said:

    Watch 'Road Wars' on Sky and I suspect the sort of attitude often shown
    there is what the OP is referring to....

    I have, it's medieval. If your a lickspittle you're sent on your way, if
    you don't kowtow you get nicked. There is no law that says " you must
    respect a policeman" so to make up for it the police use other powers.

    It isn't any more medieval than having respect for the law of the
    land. Or do you believe that you are only guilty if caught (the 11th
    commandment).
    There are officers with attitude problems, but I'd like to believe
    they are in the minority. There are a lot more people out there with
    attitude problems. If they want to be treated as adults then they
    should behave like adults. One can behave in a decent manner without
    being a lickspittle and tugging ones forelock.

    ...d

  9. David Martin said:
    marc said:
    cupra said:

    marc wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav
    >> charriot with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN
    >> notice attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a
    >> stop. Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    >> blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    >> After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    >> wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    >> mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    >> would have paid for a decent second hand car.
    >> Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    >> should be taught the error of his ways
    > Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?
    Watch 'Road Wars' on Sky and I suspect the sort of attitude often shown
    there is what the OP is referring to....


    I have, it's medieval. If your a lickspittle you're sent on your way, if
    you don't kowtow you get nicked. There is no law that says " you must
    respect a policeman" so to make up for it the police use other powers.

    It isn't any more medieval than having respect for the law of the
    land. Or do you believe that you are only guilty if caught (the 11th
    commandment).
    There are officers with attitude problems, but I'd like to believe
    they are in the minority. There are a lot more people out there with
    attitude problems. If they want to be treated as adults then they
    should behave like adults. One can behave in a decent manner without
    being a lickspittle and tugging ones forelock.


    #
    How can you have repect for law officers that act as this the driver
    was subjected to further disruption not because the police thought
    anything more was wrong, not because he had committed an offence , but
    because " his attitude" and the officers taught "the error of his ways".
    Later it was found that he had committed an offence, but it was spite
    that was the root of him being held there ( whilst waiting for a traffic
    officer) not anything else. Put yourself in the same postion, you are
    stopped for cycling on a road with a cycle path next to it, your
    attitude is decided not to be correct by the officers ( you don't get to
    decide if it's correct, they do that) and so you are further
    inconvienced just to teach you the error of your ways. Would you like that?

  10. In article said:


    Slightly OT - but...

    I have a serious suggestion that I would like air; it involves the
    setting up of a penal colony in the Falkland Islands - similar to
    Australia or French Guyana from days of old.

    Violent, reckless, anti-social or otherwise serious nuisance citizens
    which demonstrate a clear and sustained propensity towards de-
    stabilizing our society should quite simply have access to that
    society removed.

    UK prison population ~80,000. Current Falklands Islands population ~3,100.
    What proportion of the UK prison population do you think you can send to the
    Falklands without telling the current inhabitants that we might have fought
    a war for their right to be a British dependency in the past, but we're
    going to completely change the nature of their home and they can leave if
    they don't like it? What proportion of UK Prison Service employees do you
    think will be happy with being transferred to the Falklands (or were you
    thinking of simply dumping the prisoners there unsupervised)?

  11. On 1 Oct,

    Duncan Smith said:

    Pack 'em on a ship to the Falklands. 15-25 years labour should give
    them plenty of time to reflect on how society wasn't that bad after
    all. For those it doesn't reform - at least it takes them out of the
    equation for a very long time.

    I doubt the upright citizens of the Falklands would agree. How about
    somewhere like Rockall?

    --
    BD
    Change lycos to yahoo to reply

  12. marc said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways

    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    Behaving reasonably does not mean kowtowing. Similarly standing up to
    the police when they exceed their powers does not require one to be
    obnoxious. Pulling over cars that appear to be being driven illegally
    is not harrassment. If Sniper hadn't stopped him he'd still be roaring
    round with his blacked out windows, no licence, invalid insurance, and
    with the same eff-you attitude to pedestrians, cyclists and other
    motorists that he displayed to the police.

    The vehicle examiner had to make a judgement call: "If I let him drive
    home will he do so sensibly and carefully, or will he go roaring off
    in a childish display of emotion, risking innocent people's lives?" By
    the sound of it it was an easy decision.

    --
    Dave...

  13. dkahn400 said:
    marc said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways


    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    Behaving reasonably does not mean kowtowing. Similarly standing up to
    the police when they exceed their powers does not require one to be
    obnoxious. Pulling over cars that appear to be being driven illegally
    is not harrassment.


    At no time did I say it was, what followed later could well be seen as.
    If Sniper hadn't stopped him he'd still be roaring

    Quoted message said:

    round with his blacked out windows, no licence, invalid insurance, and
    with the same eff-you attitude to pedestrians, cyclists and other
    motorists that he displayed to the police.

    I have no problem with the intial stop because of the SORN

    Quoted message said:


    The vehicle examiner had to make a judgement call: "If I let him drive
    home will he do so sensibly and carefully, or will he go roaring off
    in a childish display of emotion, risking innocent people's lives?" By
    the sound of it it was an easy decision.

    I have no problem with the vehicle examiners decsion. However he was
    called in to teach the driver a lesson in how to talk to the police, not
    to for any other reason.


  14. Quoted message said:


    UK prison population ~80,000. Current Falklands Islands population ~3,100.
    What proportion of the UK prison population do you think you can send to the
    Falklands without telling the current inhabitants that we might have fought
    a war for their right to be a British dependency in the past, but we're
    going to completely change the nature of their home and they can leave if
    they don't like it? What proportion of UK Prison Service employees do you
    think will be happy with being transferred to the Falklands (or were you
    thinking of simply dumping the prisoners there unsupervised)?

    I doubt the current population would be able to remain in any
    meaningful way. A shame, but come on.. 3,100 people, more people than
    that have up-rooted to build motorways in the past.

    The recent war clouds the issue emotionally. I don't want to get into
    a debate about that, but there have been other possible motives banded
    about which have some credibility.

    Gee, I don't know. What was the inmate/guard ratio in French Guiana -
    maybe we could match that for starters. The Army are already out
    there right? Perhaps they could oversee in-mates build their own
    societies.

    I care more about not being mugged at knife-point for the contents of
    my wallet, or having my partner able to walk home from work without
    being raped - than I do for the wellbeing of the perpetrators of this
    counter-culture. Let them exist in a society made up of people like
    themselves. They can beat, mug, rape and murder each other to their
    heart's contents - so long as they're not doing it here to people like
    you and me, thats a big plus.

    Have you checked to see how much of your council tax goes to the
    Police, and how much of that is spent trying to mould repeat offenders
    into society. Why put up with it all?

  15. Duncan Smith said:

    I have a serious suggestion that I would like air; it involves the
    setting up of a penal colony in the Falkland Islands

    Personally I think the Falklands are too good for them, send them to
    Rockall. :-)
    --
    Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"


  16. Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Pack 'em on a ship to the Falklands. 15-25 years labour should give
    them plenty of time to reflect on how society wasn't that bad after
    all. For those it doesn't reform - at least it takes them out of the
    equation for a very long time.

    I doubt the upright citizens of the Falklands would agree. How about
    somewhere like Rockall?

    Could work. Bit close though...

  17. marc said:
    dkahn400 said:
    marc said:

    [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    > should be taught the error of his ways
    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    Quoted message said:

    Behaving reasonably does not mean kowtowing. Similarly standing up to
    the police when they exceed their powers does not require one to be
    obnoxious. Pulling over cars that appear to be being driven illegally
    is not harrassment.

    At no time did I say it was, what followed later could well be seen as.
    If Sniper hadn't stopped him he'd still be roaring

    Quoted message said:

    round with his blacked out windows, no licence, invalid insurance, and
    with the same eff-you attitude to pedestrians, cyclists and other
    motorists that he displayed to the police.

    I have no problem with the intial stop because of the SORN

    Quoted message said:

    The vehicle examiner had to make a judgement call: "If I let him drive
    home will he do so sensibly and carefully, or will he go roaring off
    in a childish display of emotion, risking innocent people's lives?" By
    the sound of it it was an easy decision.

    I have no problem with the vehicle examiners decsion. However he was
    called in to teach the driver a lesson in how to talk to the police, not
    to for any other reason.

    To be fair we had a pretty good idea it was going to fail before we
    called the examiner and would have called him to check the safety of
    the screen in any case and the final outcome would have been exactly
    the same.. You don't seriously believe we would stop a vehicle and
    not check the driver's insurance and driving credentials do you?

    Sniper8052

  18. Quoted message said:
    marc said:
    dkahn400 said:

    On Oct 1, 10:16 am, marc <[email hidden]> wrote:
    > [email hidden] wrote:
    >> Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    >> should be taught the error of his ways
    > Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?
    Behaving reasonably does not mean kowtowing. Similarly standing up to
    the police when they exceed their powers does not require one to be
    obnoxious. Pulling over cars that appear to be being driven illegally
    is not harrassment.


    At no time did I say it was, what followed later could well be seen as.
    If Sniper hadn't stopped him he'd still be roaring

    Quoted message said:

    round with his blacked out windows, no licence, invalid insurance, and
    with the same eff-you attitude to pedestrians, cyclists and other
    motorists that he displayed to the police.


    I have no problem with the intial stop because of the SORN

    Quoted message said:

    The vehicle examiner had to make a judgement call: "If I let him drive
    home will he do so sensibly and carefully, or will he go roaring off
    in a childish display of emotion, risking innocent people's lives?" By
    the sound of it it was an easy decision.


    I have no problem with the vehicle examiners decsion. However he was
    called in to teach the driver a lesson in how to talk to the police, not
    to for any other reason.

    To be fair we had a pretty good idea it was going to fail before we
    called the examiner and would have called him to check the safety of
    the screen in any case and the final outcome would have been exactly
    the same.. You don't seriously believe we would stop a vehicle and
    not check the driver's insurance and driving credentials do you?


    Not relevant. You stated your reasons for calling in the examiner, those
    reasons were that you believed the driver needed teaching a lesson.

    In 1984 lots of miners needed teaching lessons.

    It's a very slippery slope from one to the other.

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:


    I have a serious suggestion that I would like air; it involves the
    setting up of a penal colony in the Falkland Islands - similar to
    Australia or French Guyana from days of old.

    Violent, reckless, anti-social or otherwise serious nuisance citizens
    which demonstrate a clear and sustained propensity towards de-
    stabilizing our society should quite simply have access to that
    society removed.

    Pack 'em on a ship to the Falklands. 15-25 years labour should give
    them plenty of time to reflect on how society wasn't that bad after
    all. For those it doesn't reform - at least it takes them out of the
    equation for a very long time.

    Why not use Australia again - not that it worked last time ;-)

    --
    Tony

    " I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
    Bertrand Russell

  20. marc said:
    Quoted message said:

    Poodling about in the bumble mobile the we spot a likely chav charriot
    with blacked out windows. A quick check reveals a SORN notice
    attached to the vehicle so, curiosity aroused we put in a stop.

    Out steps yon spotty youth complete with Burberry baseball cap and
    blond girlfriend wearing next to nothing.
    After a short conversation, during which he is warned a few times to
    wind his neck in, it transpires he has just bought the vehicle from a
    mate for probably a little more than it was worth, IE more than I
    would have paid for a decent second hand car.

    Anyhow as his attitude still stinks and we feverently believe he
    should be taught the error of his ways

    Kowtow to the police or expect to be harrased?

    I should think rather that it is lack of respect for other members of
    society in general that was displayed by the young gentleman. He clearly
    was not operating at either the higher-ethical-principle or the
    law-and-order level of moral reasoning, but at the pain-and-pleasure level.
    The proper method of remedying this is to treat the misbehaviour at that
    level, while giving a clear indication that progress to an higher level is
    possible (and desired). The actions of the constables did exactly that.

    In the old days a clip round the ear'ole would have been part of the
    treatment. We expect the police to have and display judgement and
    discretion; both were correctly applied in this case.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.