Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Bolt hole circle

Started by !Jones · · Last activity · 4 posts · 383 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
28 September 2007
Last activity
29 September 2007
Original author
!Jones
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
383
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In G-code programming, the parameters to the bolt hole circle (bhc)
    procedure are radius, angle from vertical to first hole, and number of
    holes. My point is that when anyone but a cyclist talks about a bhc,
    he or she universally specifies a *radius*, not a diameter.

    So, a 110 bhc should be 55!!!

    Jones

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    !Jones said:

    In G-code programming, the parameters to the bolt hole circle (bhc)
    procedure are radius, angle from vertical to first hole, and number of
    holes. My point is that when anyone but a cyclist talks about a bhc,
    he or she universally specifies a *radius*, not a diameter.

    So, a 110 bhc should be 55!!!

    Jones

    Well, that's fair, but the actual most useful in-the-field measure, as
    Sheldon points out somewhere, is the distance from bolt to bolt for a
    given BCD and bolt pattern*.

    Bolt-bolt centres are an easy thing to measure, while the diameter is
    hard to directly measure.

    Also, BCD feels relevant to cyclists because it constrains the smallest
    number of teeth a ring on that bolt circle can have (about 39 for 130 mm
    BCD, barring heroic efforts).

    *bolt pattern being a distinction that was hardly necessary until the
    advent of 4-bolt MTB cranks

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  3. in rec.bicycles.tech Ryan Cousineau said:

    Well, that's fair, but the actual most useful in-the-field measure, as
    Sheldon points out somewhere, is the distance from bolt to bolt for a
    given BCD and bolt pattern*.

    Oh, I agree. If I ever had to solve a BHC, I'd start with that as the
    easiest measurement to take; then I count the holes and pull out my
    calculator. My point is that, mathematically, a circle is defined by
    a radius. I was cutting a chain ring the other day and I accidentally
    plugged in 110 is what brought it to mind. I hadn't ever really
    thought about it, but we're the only bunch I know of to use a
    diameter.

    Jones

  4. !Jones said:

    In G-code programming, the parameters to the bolt hole circle (bhc)
    procedure are radius, angle from vertical to first hole, and number of
    holes. My point is that when anyone but a cyclist talks about a bhc,
    he or she universally specifies a *radius*, not a diameter.

    So, a 110 bhc should be 55!!!

    Jones

    But cyclists don't talk about BHCs. They talk about BCDs.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.