UK and Europe · Public discussion

c2c

Started by FabJack · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,554 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 August 2007
Last activity
21 August 2007
Original author
FabJack
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,554
Views / 30 days
2

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am considering doing the c2c next spring, with the possibility of the
    Reivers Route as a return. Gives me enough time to get into training!!

    As I start to put flesh on the plan I think I'd like to do it self
    contained and camp along the way.

    My one main concern is my bike. At the moment I have a mountain bike
    with no attachments to take paniers etc.

    I realise that I aught to consider buying a new bike for the trip.

    I would like to do the off road bits if at all possible.

    Any suggestions at to what sort of beast I should be looking for?

    Price? £500 - £1000 for the bike and paniers/luggage.

    REgards

  2. FabJack said:

    I am considering doing the c2c next spring, with the possibility of the
    Reivers Route as a return. Gives me enough time to get into training!!

    As I start to put flesh on the plan I think I'd like to do it self
    contained and camp along the way.

    My one main concern is my bike. At the moment I have a mountain bike
    with no attachments to take paniers etc.

    I realise that I aught to consider buying a new bike for the trip.

    I would like to do the off road bits if at all possible.

    Any suggestions at to what sort of beast I should be looking for?

    I will be doing the C2C in 24hrs for a charity event next month. I
    planned to do it on my rigid bike which is more than capable, only as
    I did longer training rides my arms began to ache after 30 miles off
    road with all the shaking through the front of the bike.

    Quoted message said:

    Price? £500 - £1000 for the bike and paniers/luggage.

    If you have that much money available then great. But it's not
    necessary to spend that much on a bike for the C2C. I just bought a
    GT Aggressor XC1 which is £500 and it's a great bike but a bike of
    lesser spec would do the C2C.

  3. FabJack said:

    I am considering doing the c2c next spring, with the possibility of the
    Reivers Route as a return. Gives me enough time to get into training!!

    As I start to put flesh on the plan I think I'd like to do it self
    contained and camp along the way.

    My one main concern is my bike. At the moment I have a mountain bike
    with no attachments to take paniers etc.

    I realise that I aught to consider buying a new bike for the trip.

    I would like to do the off road bits if at all possible.

    Any suggestions at to what sort of beast I should be looking for?

    Price? £500 - £1000 for the bike and paniers/luggage.

    REgards

    Just got back from doing the C2C last Friday. Stick with a mountain
    bike is what my girlfriend and I did. Only change was to change to a
    slicker tyre. Specialized nimbus Armadillo was what they had nearby.
    Made an enormous difference to rolling along the road and there is
    lots of road. Also made the off road sections more fun than they would
    have been otherwise.
    I am no fit cyclist by any means but am fitter on the bike than my
    girlfriend so we went for a trailer. Got the Edinburgh Cycles trailer
    but from ebay for £100 and just needs you to change the rear skewer to
    attach it. We did no specific training (although had planned to) and
    previous to starting had only done 20 miles in one day. First day was
    37 (we did it in 5 days) and we camped so also took tent, sleeping
    mats, cooking stuff etc.
    Point is we spent most of the day everyday on the bikes, plodded along
    and loved it, absolutely loved it. Fantastic views back along the
    route and great satisfaction from looking down on where you have been.
    The trailer let me take the strain and being a one wheeler made most
    bike gates and passing walkers etc easier. Mountain bike with slicks
    gave the gear range we needed to get up the hills (still finished off
    a set of cleats with some pushing up the hills though).

    Whatever you decide to do though make sure you do it. We are already
    thinking of going somewhere flatter for more distance/more time to do
    stuff during the day, longer trip with two days in each spot for sight
    seeing/other holiday things but make sure you do it. Camping or B&B,
    whatever, we loved it, absolutely loved it!

    Tracker.

  4. tracker1972 said:

    Just got back from doing the C2C last Friday. Stick with a mountain
    bike is what my girlfriend and I did. Only change was to change to a
    slicker tyre. Specialized nimbus Armadillo was what they had nearby.
    Made an enormous difference to rolling along the road and there is
    lots of road. Also made the off road sections more fun than they would
    have been otherwise.
    I am no fit cyclist by any means but am fitter on the bike than my
    girlfriend so we went for a trailer. Got the Edinburgh Cycles trailer
    but from ebay for £100 and just needs you to change the rear skewer to
    attach it. We did no specific training (although had planned to) and
    previous to starting had only done 20 miles in one day. First day was
    37 (we did it in 5 days) and we camped so also took tent, sleeping
    mats, cooking stuff etc.
    Point is we spent most of the day everyday on the bikes, plodded along
    and loved it, absolutely loved it. Fantastic views back along the
    route and great satisfaction from looking down on where you have been.
    The trailer let me take the strain and being a one wheeler made most
    bike gates and passing walkers etc easier. Mountain bike with slicks
    gave the gear range we needed to get up the hills (still finished off
    a set of cleats with some pushing up the hills though).

    Whatever you decide to do though make sure you do it. We are already
    thinking of going somewhere flatter for more distance/more time to do
    stuff during the day, longer trip with two days in each spot for sight
    seeing/other holiday things but make sure you do it. Camping or B&B,
    whatever, we loved it, absolutely loved it!

    Thanks for the RR, quite inspirational - reading these always makes me
    want to be out their doing the same sort of thing. Just bought a MTB
    tandem, and would quite like to try C2C on it next year, maybe
    returning via the Reivers Route (the logistics of finishing somewhere
    other than you start with a tandem can be difficult, not many train
    companies are tandem friendly).

    I guess if you can get through on a single + trailer, we could make it
    on a tandem. We'd probably stay in B&Bs, to cut the luggage down.

    Rob

  5. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    tracker1972 said:

    Thanks for the RR, quite inspirational - reading these always makes me
    want to be out their doing the same sort of thing. Just bought a MTB
    tandem, and would quite like to try C2C on it next year, maybe
    returning via the Reivers Route (the logistics of finishing somewhere
    other than you start with a tandem can be difficult, not many train
    companies are tandem friendly).

    I guess if you can get through on a single + trailer, we could make it
    on a tandem. We'd probably stay in B&Bs, to cut the luggage down.

    We did c2c using the road options where appropriate, returning via the
    Reivers - IMO it makes for a much better ride than the c2c alone. We were on
    our road tandem (our companions were on traditional touring solos), staying
    at a mix of B+B and hostels.

    cheers,
    clive

  6. Clive George said:

    We did c2c using the road options where appropriate, returning via the
    Reivers - IMO it makes for a much better ride than the c2c alone. We
    were on our road tandem (our companions were on traditional touring
    solos), staying at a mix of B+B and hostels.

    I did the reverse and depending where you are coming from I think its a
    better option. Newcastle has much better train connections so is a
    better start point than the west coast and IMO the C2C is a more
    interesting ride than the Reivers and better done west to east. Which
    ends up with doing the Reivers westwards from Newcastle then back
    eastwards on the C2C. YMMV.

    --
    Tony

    " I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
    Bertrand Russell

  7. Quoted message said:
    tracker1972 said:

    Just got back from doing the C2C last Friday. Stick with a mountain
    bike is what my girlfriend and I did. Only change was to change to a
    slicker tyre. Specialized nimbus Armadillo was what they had nearby.
    Made an enormous difference to rolling along the road and there is
    lots of road. Also made the off road sections more fun than they would
    have been otherwise.
    I am no fit cyclist by any means but am fitter on the bike than my
    girlfriend so we went for a trailer. Got the Edinburgh Cycles trailer
    but from ebay for £100 and just needs you to change the rear skewer to
    attach it. We did no specific training (although had planned to) and
    previous to starting had only done 20 miles in one day. First day was
    37 (we did it in 5 days) and we camped so also took tent, sleeping
    mats, cooking stuff etc.
    Point is we spent most of the day everyday on the bikes, plodded along
    and loved it, absolutely loved it. Fantastic views back along the
    route and great satisfaction from looking down on where you have been.
    The trailer let me take the strain and being a one wheeler made most
    bike gates and passing walkers etc easier. Mountain bike with slicks
    gave the gear range we needed to get up the hills (still finished off
    a set of cleats with some pushing up the hills though).

    Quoted message said:

    Whatever you decide to do though make sure you do it. We are already
    thinking of going somewhere flatter for more distance/more time to do
    stuff during the day, longer trip with two days in each spot for sight
    seeing/other holiday things but make sure you do it. Camping or B&B,
    whatever, we loved it, absolutely loved it!

    Thanks for the RR, quite inspirational - reading these always makes me
    want to be out their doing the same sort of thing. Just bought a MTB
    tandem, and would quite like to try C2C on it next year, maybe
    returning via the Reivers Route (the logistics of finishing somewhere
    other than you start with a tandem can be difficult, not many train
    companies are tandem friendly).

    I guess if you can get through on a single + trailer, we could make it
    on a tandem. We'd probably stay in B&Bs, to cut the luggage down.

    Rob

    I would love to watch your faces coming down through Whinlatter Woods
    on a tandem! Knowing I was in charge it was an experience on non-MTB
    tyres, knowing I had someone behind me with no steering or brakes
    would certainly focus the mind, and possibly theirs! There are several
    companies that will transport you back to the start with minibus/
    trailer combo. If you plan far enough ahead you can get on with an
    existing supported trip for £18 each I think from Newcastle to
    Whitehaven I think it was. We nearly used a taxi firm that would shift
    bikes but was going to be £120 for the two of us. Would have been the
    same with more people if that is a possibility? In the end a heroic
    figure offered to pick us up and take us back, an 8 hour round trip
    for them so thanks again Dad :-)

    Tracker.

  8. tracker1972 said:
    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for the RR, quite inspirational - reading these always makes me
    want to be out their doing the same sort of thing. Just bought a MTB
    tandem, and would quite like to try C2C on it next year, maybe
    returning via the Reivers Route (the logistics of finishing somewhere
    other than you start with a tandem can be difficult, not many train
    companies are tandem friendly).

    I would love to watch your faces coming down through Whinlatter Woods
    on a tandem! Knowing I was in charge it was an experience on non-MTB
    tyres, knowing I had someone behind me with no steering or brakes
    would certainly focus the mind, and possibly theirs!

    Hmm, just looked at that on the map, it does look interesting. And
    there are braking issues on a tandem you don't have to worry about on
    singles.

    Quoted message said:

    There are several
    companies that will transport you back to the start with minibus/
    trailer combo. If you plan far enough ahead you can get on with an
    existing supported trip for £18 each I think from Newcastle to
    Whitehaven I think it was.

    Sounds good value, thanks. Doing C2C is just a concept at the moment,
    I haven't done any serious research yet. C2C on its own looks maybe a
    little short for us but C2C plus Reivers a little long. Anyway, we'll
    see.

    Rob

  9. leandr42 said:


    Hmm, just looked at that on the map, it does look interesting. And there
    are braking issues on a tandem you don't have to worry about on singles.

    Not as bad as you might think. Unlike a single you are not going to endo
    on a tandem so you can brake much harder with the front brake while there
    is also minimal weight transfer off the back wheel so you can brake
    equally effectively with that. Net result going down hill is you have
    twice the weight approx and twice the braking approx dissipated on twice
    the number of braked wheels. Also without the risk of an endo, you can
    go downhill faster on a tandem because of its stability.

    --
    Tony

    " I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
    Bertrand Russell

  10. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm, just looked at that on the map, it does look interesting. And
    there are braking issues on a tandem you don't have to worry about on
    singles.

    Against that, provided you've got the mechanical ones sorted (viz, have
    something powerful enough and maybe a drag brake), braking on a tandem is
    dead easy : Pull the levers, stop. No need to hang [censored] over saddle or
    anything like that when going down steep stuff.

    cheers,
    clive

  11. Tony Raven said:
    leandr42 said:

    Hmm, just looked at that on the map, it does look interesting. And there
    are braking issues on a tandem you don't have to worry about on singles.

    Not as bad as you might think. Unlike a single you are not going to endo
    on a tandem so you can brake much harder with the front brake while there
    is also minimal weight transfer off the back wheel so you can brake
    equally effectively with that. Net result going down hill is you have
    twice the weight approx and twice the braking approx dissipated on twice
    the number of braked wheels. Also without the risk of an endo, you can
    go downhill faster on a tandem because of its stability.

    Thanks for the reassurance, but I still feel a bit worried. It's a
    blow out from overheating that bothers me - really don't fancy that
    happening on the front wheel of a tandem at speed going down a steep
    hill... Plan is to rely on the back brake for controlling speed and
    just use the front for actually stopping (our tandem just has two rim
    brakes). If the back brake won't control the speed, then we'll stop
    and check rim temperatures. I've had a back wheel blow at speed on a
    hill on a single (for other reasons) and it wasn't really a problem,
    more surprising than anything else.

    Quite stimulating getting to grips with a tandem - every now and then
    I forget I can't flick the wheels round a pot hole the way I can a
    single, you have to set the line up a bit earlier. Quite pleased
    yesterday to get it through a 6" gap at the end of some speed bumps
    without mishap. Remembering when to tell stoker what you are doing is
    another challenge - some thing are obvious, but it seemed so obvious
    we were stopping in the middle of nowhere on a country road for road
    works with traffic lights that it didn't seem worth mentioning.

    Rob

  12. Quoted message said:


    Thanks for the reassurance, but I still feel a bit worried. It's a
    blow out from overheating that bothers me - really don't fancy that
    happening on the front wheel of a tandem at speed going down a steep
    hill...

    I had that explosively on a mtb, on a steep hill on the c2c - not fun!

    pk

  13. leandr42 said:


    Thanks for the reassurance, but I still feel a bit worried. It's a blow
    out from overheating that bothers me - really don't fancy that happening
    on the front wheel of a tandem at speed going down a steep hill... Plan
    is to rely on the back brake for controlling speed and just use the
    front for actually stopping (our tandem just has two rim brakes). If the
    back brake won't control the speed, then we'll stop and check rim
    temperatures. I've had a back wheel blow at speed on a hill on a single
    (for other reasons) and it wasn't really a problem, more surprising than
    anything else.

    If you are doing a lot of long downhills consider fitting an Arai drum
    brake to supplement the rim brakes. They are intended to handle high
    thermal loads and are not so much for stopping as acting in continuous
    drag mode to keep the speed down. I have ours operated from a gripshift
    fitted to a Minoura Spacebar.

    If its any consolation I had an explosive blow out of the front tube
    (sidewall failure of the tyre) one the tandem on a steepish gravel
    downhill in Finland. It wasn't that difficult to bring it to a stop
    using the back brake only.

    Quoted message said:


    Quite stimulating getting to grips with a tandem - every now and then I
    forget I can't flick the wheels round a pot hole the way I can a single,
    you have to set the line up a bit earlier.

    Yep, tandems go through obstacle rather than over them ;-) I have seen
    a tandem bunnyhopped by a very together team but its probably beyond most
    people.

    --
    Tony

    " I would never die for my beliefs because I might be wrong."
    Bertrand Russell

  14. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for the reassurance, but I still feel a bit worried. It's a
    blow out from overheating that bothers me - really don't fancy that
    happening on the front wheel of a tandem at speed going down a steep
    hill... Plan is to rely on the back brake for controlling speed and
    just use the front for actually stopping (our tandem just has two rim
    brakes). If the back brake won't control the speed, then we'll stop
    and check rim temperatures. I've had a back wheel blow at speed on a
    hill on a single (for other reasons) and it wasn't really a problem,
    more surprising than anything else.

    Controlling speed with just the one brake is a poor plan - it's entirely
    possible to find a hill which would cook one rim but would be safe with two.

    Experience helps here, but things to do include:

    Sit up and let the wind slow you down.
    Go quickly if you can - more wind resistance.
    Dragging the brakes is bad, although I'll do it sometimes.

    Basically you want to lose energy in the form of heat. The hotter the rims
    are, the more they'll lose per unit time. So getting them really quite hot
    then letting them alone for a bit could well actually result in more heat
    dissipation than dragging them while warm. Alternating brakes can work for
    this too.

    Before you've had experience, probably sensible to check for heat on the way
    down and stop if necessary. Otherwise I'd agree on using the back more than
    the front, but do use the front and don't be afraid to give it some welly.

    And I've never actually blown tyres off, just holed them.

    cheers,
    clive

  15. On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:24:25 +0000, tracker1972 wrote:

    we loved it, absolutely loved it!

    Quoted message said:


    Tracker.

    Thanks for that Tracker.

    So it seems a mountain bike is the way to go, not into tandems, need
    someone else to help peddle!

    Thanks for the general advice, back to the planning.

  16. Tony Raven said:

    If you are doing a lot of long downhills consider fitting an Arai drum
    brake to supplement the rim brakes. They are intended to handle high
    thermal loads and are not so much for stopping as acting in continuous
    drag mode to keep the speed down. I have ours operated from a gripshift
    fitted to a Minoura Spacebar.

    Yes, I've heard of them. But tandeming is strictly a budget project at
    the moment - my partner sees it more as having fun for a year then get
    rid of it thing. Our tandem rides very well, so any changes are being
    kept to a minimum.

    Quoted message said:

    If its any consolation I had an explosive blow out of the front tube
    (sidewall failure of the tyre) one the tandem on a steepish gravel
    downhill in Finland. It wasn't that difficult to bring it to a stop
    using the back brake only.

    That's much more reassuring. It's not the stopping I'm worried about
    so much as total loss of control. I don't know if that's what happens,
    but I'd rather not find out.

    Quoted message said:

    Yep, tandems go through obstacle rather than over them ;-) I have seen
    a tandem bunnyhopped by a very together team but its probably beyond most
    people.

    Wow, I'd like to see that. For some reason I wondered about
    bunnyhopping, then I just thought, no, don't be ridiculous...

    Rob

  17. Clive George said:

    Controlling speed with just the one brake is a poor plan - it's entirely
    possible to find a hill which would cook one rim but would be safe with two.

    Experience helps here, but things to do include:

    Sit up and let the wind slow you down.
    Go quickly if you can - more wind resistance.
    Dragging the brakes is bad, although I'll do it sometimes.

    Basically you want to lose energy in the form of heat. The hotter the rims
    are, the more they'll lose per unit time. So getting them really quite hot
    then letting them alone for a bit could well actually result in more heat
    dissipation than dragging them while warm. Alternating brakes can work for
    this too.

    Before you've had experience, probably sensible to check for heat on the way
    down and stop if necessary. Otherwise I'd agree on using the back more than
    the front, but do use the front and don't be afraid to give it some welly.

    Thanks for the advice, I've still got a lot to learn. I know about
    using the brakes in bursts to give the rims chance to cool. Also air
    braking - I started to wonder if you could get a parachute for
    emergencies, like the ones for planes landing on air craft carriers.

    More seriously, one of the reasons I'm concerned (apart from general
    lack of experience) is that our tandem has 26" wheels which I read
    have 19% less ability to absorb heat than 27" wheels (they are
    actually nearly 3" smaller, because the sizing assumes a much thicker
    tyre.

    Rob

  18. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Clive George said:

    Controlling speed with just the one brake is a poor plan - it's entirely
    possible to find a hill which would cook one rim but would be safe with
    two.

    Experience helps here, but things to do include:

    Sit up and let the wind slow you down.
    Go quickly if you can - more wind resistance.
    Dragging the brakes is bad, although I'll do it sometimes.

    Basically you want to lose energy in the form of heat. The hotter the
    rims
    are, the more they'll lose per unit time. So getting them really quite
    hot
    then letting them alone for a bit could well actually result in more heat
    dissipation than dragging them while warm. Alternating brakes can work
    for
    this too.

    Before you've had experience, probably sensible to check for heat on the
    way
    down and stop if necessary. Otherwise I'd agree on using the back more
    than
    the front, but do use the front and don't be afraid to give it some
    welly.

    Thanks for the advice, I've still got a lot to learn. I know about
    using the brakes in bursts to give the rims chance to cool. Also air
    braking - I started to wonder if you could get a parachute for
    emergencies, like the ones for planes landing on air craft carriers.

    More seriously, one of the reasons I'm concerned (apart from general
    lack of experience) is that our tandem has 26" wheels which I read
    have 19% less ability to absorb heat than 27" wheels (they are
    actually nearly 3" smaller, because the sizing assumes a much thicker
    tyre.

    Rob


    Why do you need to use 2 wheels?

    http://www.unicycle.uk.com/c2c.htm

    Andy

  19. AndyN said:

    Why do you need to use 2 wheels?

    http://www.unicycle.uk.com/c2c.htm

    Well on a tandem, we'll have the same number of wheels per rider as a
    unicycle...

    Seriously, I impressed, don't think I could do that.

    Rob

  20. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Sounds good value, thanks. Doing C2C is just a concept at the moment,
    I haven't done any serious research yet. C2C on its own looks maybe a
    little short for us but C2C plus Reivers a little long. Anyway, we'll
    see.

    Rob

    You might consider the Hadrians Cycle route for the return journey and stop
    at Bowness upon Solway after setting off from South Shields. It's a nice
    short crossing (about 100 miles) and you can turn back for Carlisle once
    you've reached the coast.

    Vernon

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.