Bill Eitner said:Where did you get that figure?
Do you really trust the source?
With those answers you can probably answer your own
questions.
Sorry -- Head of Kinesiology at University of Texas, his book
"Nutrient Timing." I also see them Accelerade folks marketing it, so
I ask....
Quoted message said:Yes (as far as I'm concerned).
But I'm not really into sports drinks.
Pre and post workout meals with about a 1:1
carb to protein ratio and lots of water works
for me.
Well, such sports drinks are supposed to work like a meal, only faster
(since there's a 30-45 min. optimum anabolic window of opportunity).
Quoted message said:The way I understand it (could be wrong and/or
oversimplified), the idea is to include enough
carbohydrate to insure an adequate insulin response
every time you eat (so that nutrients are efficiently
shuttled into the cells). That's not really the
goal of sports drinks. Sports drinks (again, this
is simply my current understanding) are designed
to provide hydration, electrolytes and carbohydrate
for energy in real time (during an event rather
than for recovery).
You're right, only that now, apparently, with this "new" 4:1 idea, all
can benefit: both strength athletes and endurance athletes, since
muscle breakdown is muscle breakdown and negatively impacts both
situations.
It seems logical that at some point, there's just too much protein for
each molecule of carb to handle...but what happens to the excess
protein? Does it simply "wait on line" or is it "eliminated"
altogether?
Quoted message said:My experience with creatine is from back when it was
new and exciting. Back then there were two approaches,
neither of which relied on carbohydrate. One approach
was to take say 15-20 grams of it per day for a week
or so to reach a saturation point as quickly as possible,
and then take say 5 grams of it per day to maintain that
level. The other approach was to simply take say 5 or 10
grams a day. With that level of consumption eventually
you reach saturation and then maintain it. I used the
first approach and it worked the way it was supposed to.
There was a one time increase in weight and strength that
lasted as long as I stayed on it. It didn't rely on
simultaneous carb consumption at all.
So how come you're off the creatine now, apparently? Carb pairing
with creatine is just supposed to be like carb pairing with protein --
the hi-gly carb increases speed of loading. Seems logical that a unit
of carbs is only able to handle either creatine or protein...and, with
the recommended dosage already so high...seems not beneficial to have
some many carbs around, despite the help they provide loading creatine
and protein....
Quoted message said:I've heard that, but I don't know whether or not to agree
with it. I've read some books on diabetes. In that sense
fruit sugar is considered a fast acting carbohydrate just
like any other refined sugar. Perhaps when it's in its
natural form combined with fiber it's a little slower, but
in juice form I feel that it's just as potent as sucrose.
I'd rather take fruit juice with pure creatine monohydrate, but I read
in that "Nutrient Timing" book that fructose doesn't provoke as strong
an insulin spike, and that some kinda gastrointestinal issues apply
somehow.
Quoted message said:I recently read the book "Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle."
I thought the nutrition advice was very good. I have a
copy of it in my online briefcase if you'd like to have
a look:http://briefcase.yahoo.com/kd6tas
Hey, cool!!! I've heard of that book and was wondering about
it...THANKS, MAN!!!! MOST HELPFUL POST ON MFW EVER!!!