In message <[email hidden]>, Paul Saunders
<[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:I don't think anyone is disrespecting the person who died, the objection is
to placing plaques and monuments on the hills. There have been a
proliferation of these in recent years, particularly in Snowdonia I've
heard, and they've even had to start taking action to stop this sort of
thing.
Placing a monument in the hills to someone who loved the hills is all very
well in principle, but when too many people do it, the hills get covered in
these things. And the main appeal of the hills is that they are ostensibly
wild places, with no trace of man, places where you can get away from
civilisation. If you fill up the wild places with plaques and memorials and
paths and fences and signposts and so on, it gets to the point that it's no
longer wilderness. So then where do you go to get away from it all?
There won't be any wild places left in the UK at this rate. Why can't people
just leave it alone? Why are people so obsessed with changing it and fixing
it and leaving stuff there?
It was, as yet, uncorroborated assumption that it was for a local
walker.
This subject give scope for verbose responses but in fact AFAIK there is
only ONE plaque - the one mentioned - and that may not be a remembrance
thing at all.
Do we need all this speculative narrative about the countyside being
covered with these things when in fact it is not.
--
Bill Grey