Nick Maclaren said:It needs to allow for a sleeper of 6'6" (preferably 7'😉, to allow
me to sit up in it and to turn around and store my clutter under
cover. The ability to cook in it in extremis is good (yes,I know
the risks). But I would ALSO like to be able to pitch it outer
first, and to get out to pee in the middle of the night without
letting too much rain in, neither of which my current tent will do.
While neither of us is 6'6", we are looking at similar overall
requirements for a walking/cycling tent with a bit more space to be
comfy in than our current Spacepacker.
Tunnels seem good for providing intelligent quantities of space at
a relatively low weight. The current Benchmark seems to be the
Hilleberg Nallo, also it's extended porch "GT" version. See
http://www.hilleberg.se/default-e.HTM andProducts and Tents. These
have a sitting height at the front of the tent of 100 cm, you can
get another 5 cm by getting the 3 man version which will give you
stacks of space and still comes in at 2.4 Kg. The 3 GT comes in at
2.8 Kg, the 2 GT at 2.6 (weights given include everything,
including pole repair sleeve). The GT porches are huge, and make
cooking in the porch pretty much a non-issue as long as you
remember about CO and don't cook with a flamethrower. All
Hilebergs pitch either all in one or, if you prefer, you can do it
outer first and hang the inner later. You can also detach the
front of the inner to get more porch space for cooking which may be
useful in the non-GT, but because the Nallo slopes to the back you
may be in headroom difficulties there.
If that's a problem, the Nammatj doesn't slope until the back of
the tent, and also has the bonus of better venting and stronger
materials, but it is heavier: 2.8 Kg for the 2, and that's 95 cm
headroom rather than 100. The 105 cm headroom Nammatj 3 is 3.1 Kg,
the GT versions heavier again.
The Kaitum has a porch at each end and a high point of 100cm. That
uses the same lighter weight fabrics as the Nallos (though they're
still impressively strong) rather than the heavier ones in the
Nammatj, and comes in at 2.7 Kg.
All of the above have 220 cm long inners, the Kaitum has
practically vertical ends at both ends, all of the others taper to
the rear.
My bunker tent is a Hilleberg and I've not seen a better made tent:
attention to detail is excellent, and they'll all stand up to a
good blow (they're tested in Arctic Scandanavia for a couple of
years before getting into production), and are easily pitched by
Normal People in abnormal conditions.
Alpenstock in Stockport seem to have the best selection and best
prices for Hillebergs in the country AFAICT. They and The
Climbers' Shop in Ambleside seem to be the sum total of Kaitum
stockists, though the others (esp. the Nallo 2s) are very easy to find.
Other stuff we've looked at (on paper so far) includes Mountain
Equipment's Dragonfly XT series. 3 pole semi-geodesics rather than
tunnels, so will probably be a bit quieter in a real blow. 2 up
the 2 man version looks a bit wee, so we're looking at the 3, and
we're looking at the XT as the basic version's porch is more bijou
than we'd really like. The 3XT is 2.84 Kg
http://www.tauntonleisure.com/categories/backpacking/121/1 has much
better info on the Dragonflies than ME's own web site, which hasn't
yet noticed the 3 model exists and there are no dimensions given,
but Taunton know how big it is even if ME don't!
Terra Nova's LaserLarge also has the 220 cm (tapering) length and
100cm headroom at the front. We rejected it as we decided we
wanted 140 cm inner width, but that may not be an issue for you.
It's lighter than anything else I'm mentioning, but of course the
Gotcha from that is it'll be more fragile, both in terms of
standing up to real blows and just wear and tear longevity.
The Lightwave T2 looked very nice, but pitching is inner first and
a bit of a PITA compared to the Hilleberg. When it's up it's
arguably slightly better laid out than the Nallo, especially as far
as the doors into the extended porch on the XT model goes. But
it's fallen off the shortlist because of the relatively awkard
pitching.
On our "possibles" list we also had Vango's TBS 200, but at a
tapered 205 cm inner that might be less than ideal. But otherwise
it's in the same weight league as the Hillebergs and a good deal
cheaper. We also looked (virtually) at a Hel-Sport tunnel, which
ticks most of the boxes but doesn't have a UK importer, so unless
you're really committed to covering your bases probably easier to
forget that.
Well, hopefully that's a start... FInal decision for us is waiting
until just before we need to use it, since I've no immediate plans
to be anywhere near a Kaitum I can look at in the flesh :-(
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/