Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Fork Rake Question

Started by M3001zip · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,888 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 February 2003
Last activity
3 February 2003
Original author
M3001zip
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,888
Views / 30 days
2

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello, what is the difference between a 40 degree and a 45 degree rake.Is one better for time trials
    then the other? THANKS

  2. A shy person said:

    Hello, what is the difference between a 40 degree and a 45 degree rake.Is one better for time
    trials then the other? THANKS

    Applicability to time-trial use has nothing to do with fork rake.

    The combination of fork rake (sometimes called "offset"😉 and head tube angle determines the
    "trail" of the steering. This relates to the handling of the bike, which is not generally an issue
    in time trialing.

    Shorter-rake forks are appropriate for bikes with steeper head tube angles.

    Sheldon "Match The Frame" Brown +-------------------------------------------------------+
    | Military conscription is the worst form of slavery. | A more enlightened age will consider it a
    | War crime. |
    +-------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 harriscyclery.comharriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    captainbike.comcaptainbike.com sheldonbrown.comsheldonbrown.com

  3. M3001zip said:

    Hello, what is the difference between a 40 degree and a 45 degree rake.Is one better for time
    trials then the other? THANKS

    I think you mean 40 mm and 45 mm, not degrees. For a given head tube angle (usually about 73
    degrees), more rake (a.k.a. fork offset) will produce less trail. Less trail results in less
    stability. Time trials generally don't require quick steering, so a generous amount of trail
    wouldn't be a bad thing.

    See: phred.orgtrail.html

    Art Harris

  4. I agree with Art Harris on this point. I generally design TT machines with shorter than normal rakes
    to increase high speed stability. You will sacrifice some low speed handling. The effect of
    increased trail gets noticable at speed.

    Tom @ TET

  5. Sheldon Brown <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    A shy person said:

    Hello, what is the difference between a 40 degree and a 45 degree rake.Is one better for time
    trials then the other? THANKS

    Applicability to time-trial use has nothing to do with fork rake.

    The combination of fork rake (sometimes called "offset"😉 and head tube angle determines the
    "trail" of the steering. This relates to the handling of the bike, which is not generally an issue
    in time trialing.

    Shorter-rake forks are appropriate for bikes with steeper head tube angles.

    Sheldon "Match The Frame" Brown

    Applicability to time-trialing has everything to do with fork rake, if you're concerned about the
    effect of wind on a deep-dish rim'd front wheel.

    Time trial specific bikes typically use a 4.0 fork w/ a 73 deg or slacker head angle to achieve
    trail numbers sufficiently high enough to aid in the stability of the front end in crosswinds. If
    you can find a 3.8 offset fork, so much the better.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.