Joe Bernard said:landotter said:On Jun 21, 2:25 pm, Ozark Bicycle
Quoted message said:<[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:How to be a "rugged individualist", Riv-style:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:All bikes will have Brooks saddles, mostly B-17, in honey
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:All bikes will have overpriced Nitto Racks
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:All bikes will have seriously overpriced, cutesy poo Nigel Smyth bags
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Serious aspirants will want weirdly sized French tires
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Don't forget the twine!
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Never, ever, ever, criticize Chairman gRant
Quoted message said:Snort. That's about right. I appreciate the idealization of Japanese
bike boom bikes which is one element of the Riv recipe. Those bikes
were utilitarian in design and proletarian in price. They've also
helped reintroduce all sorts of sensible things to the bicycle
community--but also so much retarded myth. Every single Rivendell I've
seen built up around here has had the twine job on the bars. It's not
functional, but it's ugly--how clever! But the sheep lap it up.
Quoted message said:Like I mentioned in a post a while back--the Gunnar Sport seems to me
to be more of the sensible heir to the 80s sport touring bike
tradition. I combines practicality, and discards tedious fussiness
like hand waxed and crocheted cable housing runs.
Quoted message said:FWIW, I took two short rides on a Brooks saddle last night, and as
always--they look great, but feel like [censored] and are fussy and
inconsistent. Woohoo! My butt likes Unicanitors/Rolls/Turbos and
similar saddles. The obsession of the Rivendites with the Brooks
saddle, which does work for a minority of butts--to the point of
people riding these saddles in pain and obligation as some sort of
secret perineal hair shirt--is eye rollingly silly.
And the OP says....wanna talk about wheels? I understand the Riv thing
can be taken to cult levels, just as the Trek /USPS thing was a few
years ago, but, geez you guys, some people just prefer one bike over
another.
Sorry, we were just joking around.....topic drift, etc. And, FWIW, all
my bikes are steel and I appreciate their many virtues.
You asked, in part, about putting modern, low-spoke count wheels on a
traditional "rivendell style" bike. I just recently saw a pic of some
Mavic or the other on a Riv; IMO, it looked silly, like putting mags
and low aspect ratio tires on a Jag XK120. Might work fine, but looks
dumb.
Quoted message said:The same with saddles. I've tried Flites, 02Airs, Body
Geometry and plenty of other saddles. For me, Brooks isn't a
compromise of style over comfort; it's a compromise of comfort over
weight. I would rather put a lightweight saddle on a lightweight steel
bike, but the heavier one works for me.
I have an Ideale 92 (pretty much a French B-17) on one of my bikes.
Feels fine and I like the vintage look on that vintage (ca. 1975)
bike. But, IMO, it's no more comfy than the San Marco Regals and San
Marco Lazer on my other bikes. IMO, the whole slavish devotion to
Brooks is just another example of a part-of-the-herd cult thing. YMMV.
Quoted message said:Can't argue about twine and
tweed bags, though. To each his own and all that, but, not for me.