UK and Europe · Public discussion

What would you do?

Started by Bob Downie · · Last activity · 24 posts · 1,051 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
5 May 2007
Last activity
17 May 2007
Original author
Bob Downie
Posts
24
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,051
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 24
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up
    for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including
    the rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent
    kit and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have
    bought a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about
    the bike so am loth to scrap it.

    I know that there are ways to save money on a re-build, for example
    powder-coating rather than a proper re-spray such as Argos might do, but
    if I re-build I would want to keep the character of the bike.

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?
    --
    Bob Downie
    Devotee of the wheel
    please remove #n0spam# to reply directly

  2. Bob Downie wrote on 05/05/2007 17:16 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?

    Heart. If you like it and it has lots of memories, rebuild it. Don't
    worry about the comparative cost but rebuild it so you will continue to
    enjoy riding it. e.g. you might save a few pounds with a powder coat
    but remember you will be looking down on it all the time so is the
    saving worth it?

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  3. In article <[email hidden]>, Bob Downie
    BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk says...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up
    for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including
    the rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent
    kit and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have
    bought a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about
    the bike so am loth to scrap it.

    I know that there are ways to save money on a re-build, for example
    powder-coating rather than a proper re-spray such as Argos might do, but
    if I re-build I would want to keep the character of the bike.

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?


    I'd rebuild if the bike does what I need it to, or relegate it to hack
    status and get a new one if it doesn't. I wouldn't throw away anything
    that was vaguely useable.

  4. Bob Downie said:


    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?

    Look upon this as a perfect excuse to treat yourself to a new bike. You've
    kept the old one running for 18 years, you *deserve* a new bike 🙂

    Keep the old one and renovate it, everybody needs at least 2 bikes.

    A good paint job will cost quite a bit, but decent 2nd hand bits can be
    procured from ebay.

    --
    Mike
    Van Tuyl titanium Dura Ace 10
    Fausto Coppi aluminium Ultegra 10
    Raleigh Record Sprint mongrel

  5. On 05/05/2007 17:16, Bob Downie said,

    Quoted message said:

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?

    Go for a respray/rebuild. It sounds to me like if you scrap it you will
    forever regret doing so.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  6. Tony Raven said:

    If you like it and it has lots of memories, rebuild it. Don't
    worry about the comparative cost but rebuild it so you will continue to
    enjoy riding it. e.g. you might save a few pounds with a powder coat
    but remember you will be looking down on it all the time so is the
    saving worth it?

    What's the drawback with powdercoating as opposed to paint ? I was
    thinking of having this done to my frame as the paint's getting a bit
    chipped and worn.

  7. Quoted message said:

    I'd rebuild if the bike does what I need it to, or relegate it to hack
    status and get a new one if it doesn't.

    <AOL> me too </>

  8. TheMgt wrote on 05/05/2007 19:26 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    What's the drawback with powdercoating as opposed to paint ? I was
    thinking of having this done to my frame as the paint's getting a bit
    chipped and worn.

    None if the finish is what you want.

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  9. in message <[email hidden]>, Bob Downie

    ('BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk') said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up
    for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including
    the rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent
    kit and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have
    bought a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about
    the bike so am loth to scrap it.

    Frankly, I would rebuild it (and I might even be sentimental enough to use
    period parts). But it would certainly be cheaper to buy a high quality
    modern bike.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; I can't work yanks out......
    ;; Why do they frown upon sex yet relish violence?
    ;; Deep Fried Lettuce

  10. In article <[email hidden]>, TheMgt
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Tony Raven said:

    If you like it and it has lots of memories, rebuild it. Don't
    worry about the comparative cost but rebuild it so you will continue to
    enjoy riding it. e.g. you might save a few pounds with a powder coat
    but remember you will be looking down on it all the time so is the
    saving worth it?

    What's the drawback with powdercoating as opposed to paint ? I was
    thinking of having this done to my frame as the paint's getting a bit
    chipped and worn.


    Nothing if it's done well and you don't mind your frame looking like
    garden furniture. There's generally a limited choice of colours, no
    metallic or multi-coloured finishes and it's not very glossy.

  11. I'm not sure I see the dilemma. Short term buy the new bike, long term
    restore the old one. Unless of course there is some reason why you can't
    store both. There is no such thing as too many bikes.

    --chris

  12. Rob Morley said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, TheMgt
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Tony Raven said:

    If you like it and it has lots of memories, rebuild it. Don't
    worry about the comparative cost but rebuild it so you will continue to
    enjoy riding it. e.g. you might save a few pounds with a powder coat
    but remember you will be looking down on it all the time so is the
    saving worth it?


    What's the drawback with powdercoating as opposed to paint ? I was
    thinking of having this done to my frame as the paint's getting a bit
    chipped and worn.


    Nothing if it's done well and you don't mind your frame looking like
    garden furniture. There's generally a limited choice of colours, no
    metallic or multi-coloured finishes and it's not very glossy.

    http://www.bbsedinburgh.co.uk/ seem to have metallic colours and it looks
    fairly shiny. I'll need to pop in sometime and see if they've any samples
    to look at.

  13. On May 5, 12:16 pm, Bob Downie <BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk>

    Quoted message said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up
    for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including
    the rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    I just did a major overhaul on a 16 year old Bianchi and it seems
    worth it. Lovely ride. However unless the rust is more than surface
    rust I'd leave it with out the paint job I figure a rusty old drop-
    bar bike is low on the theft scale. The occasional insult like the
    bike racer in the airport line up calling my bike salé is worth it. 🙂

    Quoted message said:


    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent
    kit and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have
    bought a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about
    the bike so am loth to scrap it.

    I know that there are ways to save money on a re-build, for example
    powder-coating rather than a proper re-spray such as Argos might do, but
    if I re-build I would want to keep the character of the bike.

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?
    --
    Bob Downie
    Devotee of the wheel
    please remove #n0spam# to reply directly

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, TheMgt
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.bbsedinburgh.co.uk/ seem to have metallic colours and it looks
    fairly shiny. I'll need to pop in sometime and see if they've any samples
    to look at.


    Indeed, that looks like a pretty good finish - I guess the technology
    has moved on since I was in the frame business. :-)

  15. Bob Downie said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up
    for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including
    the rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent
    kit and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have
    bought a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about
    the bike so am loth to scrap it.

    I know that there are ways to save money on a re-build, for example
    powder-coating rather than a proper re-spray such as Argos might do, but
    if I re-build I would want to keep the character of the bike.

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?

    Get rid of it. It's a machine, made of stuff. It's given you years of
    pleasure but owes you nothing. Buy a super new bike to give you many
    more years of pleasure. Chuck the old one behind the shed, at once.

    In a couple of months you might chance to glance behind the shed and
    come upon an idea for a great restoration project, but that's quite a
    different matter.

    --
    Brian G
    www.wetwo.co.uk

  16. "Bob Downie" <BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up for
    18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including the
    rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent kit
    and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have bought
    a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about the bike so
    am loth to scrap it.

    I know that there are ways to save money on a re-build, for example
    powder-coating rather than a proper re-spray such as Argos might do, but
    if I re-build I would want to keep the character of the bike.

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?
    --
    Bob Downie
    Devotee of the wheel
    please remove #n0spam# to reply directly

    Never throw it away. If you do decide to go for a new bike, give your old
    one away to someone who would appreciate it on Freecycle. Just go rid of one
    of my old steeds that way.

    David Lloyd

  17. In message <[email hidden]>, Bob Downie
    <BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk> writes

    Quoted message said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming up
    for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state. The frame wants a re-spray
    (rusting in places) and most of the components want renewing, including
    the rims, hubs, bottom bracket and head-set etc., etc..

    My dilemma is this. Is it worth re-building? The frame and forks are
    hand-built 531ST so I am starting from a good position. However, I am a
    realist and know that by the time I have had a re-spray, bought decent
    kit and spent ages faffing around, I would probably been better to have
    bought a new machine. The problem is that I'm a bit sentimental about
    the bike so am loth to scrap it.

    I know that there are ways to save money on a re-build, for example
    powder-coating rather than a proper re-spray such as Argos might do,
    but if I re-build I would want to keep the character of the bike.

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?


    Thanks all for your suggestions which have helped me crystallise some
    ideas. The last thing I need is (another) hack bike so if I am going to
    do anything with is it has to be a pukka job. How does the following
    sound?

    1. Dismantle bike and send frame-forks for proper re-spray.
    2. Try to use old components where possible. There is nothing too awful
    about the shifters, brakes, bars, stem, seat-post, saddle etc. That will
    keep some costs down.
    3. New rims, hubs, head-set, cranks, bottom bracket, chain, gears,
    cabling, tyres etc.
    4. Keep eye out for good-quality replacements of the old stuff at good
    price (e.g. Ebay).

    I haven't costed the above but I imagine that it should come in at
    £350-£450 (more?).

    A new Dawes Galaxy (the nearest modern equivalent I can find) is about
    £700 so a re-build would seem worth it as long as I do not cost my time.

    Anything obvious that I've missed?

    Thanks
    --
    Bob Downie
    Devotee of the wheel
    please remove #n0spam# to reply directly

  18. Bob Downie BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk said:

    The last thing I need is (another) hack bike so if I am going
    to do anything with is it has to be a pukka job. How does the
    following sound?

    1. Dismantle bike and send frame-forks for proper re-spray.
    2. Try to use old components where possible. There is nothing too
    awful about the shifters, brakes, bars, stem, seat-post, saddle etc.
    That will keep some costs down.
    3. New rims, hubs, head-set, cranks, bottom bracket, chain, gears,
    cabling, tyres etc.
    4. Keep eye out for good-quality replacements of the old stuff at good
    price (e.g. Ebay).

    I haven't costed the above but I imagine that it should come in at
    £350-£450 (more?).

    Almost. I had a quick flick round google and came up with:

    Polychromatic stove enamelling from Mercian = £69 + £20 for lug lining and
    get them to fit a new Stronglight A9 headset = £15 + £11.50 fitting plus £25
    for collection/delivery
    Stronglight Impact cranks = £44 - £48 (double or triple) (Spa cycles) +
    Stronglight JP400 110mm BB = £10
    Handbuilt 700C Endeavour/Deore Touring Wheels, pair = £110 (Spa cycles)
    Shwalbe Marathon x 2 = £30 (Spa cycles)

    Which leaves you £12 ish for gears and cables.

    I'm sure you could save some on these prices if you shop around on Ebay and
    still come in under £350 But I would recommend Mercian for the paintwork.

    Tom
    --
    Return address is dead. Real address is at
    http://www.happy-penguin.info/address.jpg

  19. On 06/05/2007 18:43, Tom said,

    Quoted message said:

    But I would recommend Mercian for the paintwork.

    I won't disagree with that, but I would like to add a vote for Argos for
    the respray.

    --
    Paul Boyd
    http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/

  20. In news:[email hidden],
    Bob Downie <BobMail@downie-geo#n0spam#.co.uk> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to
    tell us:

    Quoted message said:

    I have a decision to make. My trusty Raleigh Royale tourer is coming
    up for 18 years old and is in a bit of a state.

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    So what would you do. Be a realist and throw it away or listen to your
    heart and re-build?

    1. Buy new bike
    2. Get old frame resprayed / powder-coated / Hammerited
    3. Rebuild old frame into fixer

    :-)

    --
    Dave Larrington
    <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk>
    It would appear apparent, to me at least, that dinosaurs were
    largely burrowing creatures.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.