Does anyone know?

In article <[email hidden]>,

MagillaGorilla said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
ougellis

Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?

I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.

Thanks,

Magilla

Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
good thing.

However, your completely random and insanely libelous innuendo is as
much fun as euthanasia day at the dog pound. Please, tell us more.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

Ryan Cousineau said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

MagillaGorilla said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
ougellis

Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?

I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.

Thanks,

Magilla

Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
good thing.

It's not a youth development team.

Thanks,

Magilla

MagillaGorilla said:

Ryan Cousineau said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

MagillaGorilla said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
ougellis

Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?

I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.

Thanks,

Magilla

Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
good thing.

It's not a youth development team.

Thanks,

Magilla

Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
'alluded'.

Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
ass-puppet.

What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.

Thanks,

DA74

DA74 said:

MagillaGorilla said:

Ryan Cousineau said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]> wrote:

>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
>ougellis
>
>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>
>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Magilla

Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
good thing.

It's not a youth development team.

Thanks,

Magilla

Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
'alluded'.

Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
ass-puppet.

What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.

Thanks,

DA74

The District Attorney is in.

The biggest problem I have with that interview isn't the latent
homosexuality. It is this concept of Mr. Sideburns and Lavender Man
"owning a team" and somehow parlaying that into a Pro Tour team. This
is messed up because the only thing you need to own a Pro Tour team is a
high 7-figure sponsor. And without it you don't have a Pro Tour team.
There is no transition or stepping stone.

So there's no such thing as evolving into a Pro Tour team - you either
have 7-figure sponsor or you don't.

Why does this guy think that sponsorsing a low-level team is going to
parlay itself into a Pro Tour team?

This is just another Shroeder Iron team in drag.

Thanks,

Magilla

MagillaGorilla said:

DA74 said:

MagillaGorilla said:

Ryan Cousineau wrote:

>In article <[email hidden]>,
> MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
>>ougellis
>>
>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>>
>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Magilla
>
>
>Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
>deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
>good thing.
>

It's not a youth development team.

Thanks,

Magilla

Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
'alluded'.

Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
ass-puppet.

What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.

Thanks,

DA74

The District Attorney is in.

The biggest problem I have with that interview isn't the latent
homosexuality. It is this concept of Mr. Sideburns and Lavender Man
"owning a team" and somehow parlaying that into a Pro Tour team. This
is messed up because the only thing you need to own a Pro Tour team is a
high 7-figure sponsor. And without it you don't have a Pro Tour team.
There is no transition or stepping stone.

So there's no such thing as evolving into a Pro Tour team - you either
have 7-figure sponsor or you don't.

Why does this guy think that sponsorsing a low-level team is going to
parlay itself into a Pro Tour team?

This is just another Shroeder Iron team in drag.

Thanks,

Magilla

Point well taken. I think the probable plan is for the purple pullover
pimp to farm out his king ass- puppet or sideburn boy, if you please,
to lure other unsuspecting deep pocketed corporations or individuals
into the scheme. I personally feel the Catholic Church would be an
excellent prospect, making an ideal partner on many levels. I will
elaborate on the topic in this forum if anyone is interested, otherwise
I will present directly to team management.

Thanks in advance,

DA74

DA74 said:

MagillaGorilla said:

DA74 said:

MagillaGorilla wrote:

>Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>
>
>>In article <[email hidden]>,
>>MagillaGorilla <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_d
>>>ougellis
>>>
>>>Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
>>>money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
>>>athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?
>>>
>>>I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Magilla
>>
>>
>>Monkey-thing, drink more liquor and use less LSD. The fact that a
>>deep-pocketed fan of cycling wants to support a youth-dev team is a
>>good thing.
>>
>
>It's not a youth development team.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Magilla

Good catch Grilla. I too was pondering this very issue while reading
the piece on CN. I was initially distracted by the author's improper
usage of 'eluded' in the first paragraph but it looks like they have
since corrected this error and substituted it with the correct word,
'alluded'.

Anyway, back on topic, just looking at the file photo of Ellis tells me
he's into the scene. And by scene I mean a bunch of sweaty young guys
donning thin-film lycra garments. I think it's quite possible he felt
he was purchasing some ass-puppets supplied by Vaughters, the king
ass-puppet.

What I'm trying to piece together though, and maybe you can help, is
how Vaughters may have developed a case of TMJ over the last couple
years. Oh wait, never mind. I think I just figured it out.

Thanks,

DA74

The District Attorney is in.

The biggest problem I have with that interview isn't the latent
homosexuality. It is this concept of Mr. Sideburns and Lavender Man
"owning a team" and somehow parlaying that into a Pro Tour team. This
is messed up because the only thing you need to own a Pro Tour team is a
high 7-figure sponsor. And without it you don't have a Pro Tour team.
There is no transition or stepping stone.

So there's no such thing as evolving into a Pro Tour team - you either
have 7-figure sponsor or you don't.

Why does this guy think that sponsorsing a low-level team is going to
parlay itself into a Pro Tour team?

This is just another Shroeder Iron team in drag.

Thanks,

Magilla

Point well taken. I think the probable plan is for the purple pullover
pimp to farm out his king ass- puppet or sideburn boy, if you please,
to lure other unsuspecting deep pocketed corporations or individuals
into the scheme. I personally feel the Catholic Church would be an
excellent prospect, making an ideal partner on many levels. I will
elaborate on the topic in this forum if anyone is interested, otherwise
I will present directly to team management.

Thanks in advance,

DA74

Team Rectory.

I think they could bring the Catholic Church aboard if they had a
juniors men's team and they all agreed to shower together in the rectory
after training rides.

Thanks,

Magilla

Dude,

You're in the wrong forum...there's plenty of your kind over in the
"angry white punk toilet" or even the "passive-agressive coward behind
the keyboard toilet" Please meander over and pollute some other sport
for awhile and give us a break. Have a nice day -

MagillaGorilla said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_dougellis

Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?

I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.

Thanks,

Magilla

You're just a Player Hater.

Magilla

Quoted message said:

Dude,

You're in the wrong forum...there's plenty of your kind over in the
"angry white punk toilet" or even the "passive-agressive coward behind
the keyboard toilet" Please meander over and pollute some other sport
for awhile and give us a break. Have a nice day -

MagillaGorilla said:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos.php?id=/photos/2006/features/doug_ellis/bs_dougellis

Does anyone know why an independently wealthy man would dole out his own
money on an anonymous sponsorship basis to surround himself with young
athletic men instead of spending it on chicks?

I heard Governor Jim McGreevey did the same thing.

Thanks,

Magilla