Hi all
got a sugino maxy crank. does it have the same square taper as sugino
super mighy or campagnolo cranks?
dan
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
sugino maxy compatibility
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 1 November 2006
- Last activity
- 3 November 2006
- Original author
- dan_s
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 671
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
dan_s said:
Hi all
got a sugino maxy crank. does it have the same square taper as sugino
super mighy or campagnolo cranks?
danSilly question- if it's Sugino, then it fits a JIS spindle- which is to
say it fits the same spindle as a Super Mighty crank.IIRC, the Maxy cranks were less precise than the forged Super Mighty
cranks. I've also seen quite a few Maxy cranks ruined because they
weren't tightened properly at first. If your Maxy crank goes onto the
spindle too far, it's ruined.Jeff
-
dan_s said:
got a sugino maxy crank. does it have the same square taper as sugino
super mighy or campagnolo cranks?Not necessarily. IIRC, some Maxy series cranks used with a 3 deg. taper,
and others used a 2 deg. taper. 2 deg. is what Super Mighty, Campy,
Shimano, etc. used but then again Maxy spindles tended to be a bit
longer than others.The only way to be sure is to test fit the parts. An arm designed for a
3 deg. axle will bottom out on a 2 deg. axle. Axle length will also have
to be tested. If the arm sits too close to the frame because it was
designed to use you'll have to use spacers and/or a longer axle to make
it work properly.--
John ([email hidden])
-
If memory serves me correctly, the Sugino MAXY required a pretty long
spindle, maybe 126mm.Left Midd Right Total Length
3 S S 32 52 37.5 121.5 <=== maybe for a narrow single
3 S 35 52 37.5 124.5 <=== maybe for a normal single
3 T 35 52 39 126 <=== looks like for a double
3 U 35 52 40.5 127.5Ok, this is not from memory, I'm looking at an old Sugino Catalogue
posted on a japanese website, translated into english.- Don Gillies
San Diego, CA, USA -
Donald Gillies said:
If memory serves me correctly, the Sugino MAXY required a pretty long
spindle, maybe 126mm.Left Midd Right Total Length
3 S S 32 52 37.5 121.5 <=== maybe for a narrow single
3 S 35 52 37.5 124.5 <=== maybe for a normal single
3 T 35 52 39 126 <=== looks like for a double
3 U 35 52 40.5 127.5Ok, this is not from memory, I'm looking at an old Sugino Catalogue
posted on a japanese website, translated into english.Quoted message said:
From first hand experience, I can confirm that a 3U was used in a
double on a 124mm OLD rear triangle (Ultra 6 FW). -
thanks, all of you
danOzark Bicycle said:
Donald Gillies said:
If memory serves me correctly, the Sugino MAXY required a pretty long
spindle, maybe 126mm.Left Midd Right Total Length
3 S S 32 52 37.5 121.5 <=== maybe for a narrow single
3 S 35 52 37.5 124.5 <=== maybe for a normal single
3 T 35 52 39 126 <=== looks like for a double
3 U 35 52 40.5 127.5Ok, this is not from memory, I'm looking at an old Sugino Catalogue
posted on a japanese website, translated into english.Quoted message said:
From first hand experience, I can confirm that a 3U was used in a
double on a 124mm OLD rear triangle (Ultra 6 FW).
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.