Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Compact road crankset on a MTB frame...Bonus external bearing content

Started by Barnard Frederick · · Last activity · 9 posts · 932 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
18 May 2006
Last activity
20 May 2006
Original author
Barnard Frederick
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
932
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a MTB frame that I want to put a compact road crankset on.
    Actually it is a Cannondale Bad boy (stupid name, I know) that is a
    kinda sorta hybrid. I found that external bearing cranksets have a
    limitation that I didn't know about: it doesn't appear that you can do
    any tricks with the chainline. If you buy a road crankset, you will get
    the chainline, usually 43.5mm, that is inherent to the design. A MTB
    outboard bearing crankset has spacers, but they are only there to
    compensate for a the differences between 68mm and 73mm shells. Due to
    the design of the assembly, it doesn't look like there is a way to play
    with the chainline at all. I would love to hear that I am wrong on that
    subject.

    So, like many other MTB frames, the 43.5mm chainline on this bike comes
    too close to the chainstays for comfort. I haven't actually tried it
    yet, but I really don't want to learn the hard way. Cannondale tech
    said they didn't think it would work and my measurements haven't been
    encouraging. The other option which looks like it may work is to use an
    Octalink or Isis crankset and instead of using the 108-109mm BB for
    doubles to get the 43.5mm chainline, use a 118mm BB designed for triples
    to get the chainline back to about 48mm. Opinions?

  2. Barnard Frederick said:

    I have a MTB frame that I want to put a compact road crankset on.
    Actually it is a Cannondale Bad boy (stupid name, I know) that is a
    kinda sorta hybrid. I found that external bearing cranksets have a
    limitation that I didn't know about: it doesn't appear that you can do
    any tricks with the chainline. If you buy a road crankset, you will get
    the chainline, usually 43.5mm, that is inherent to the design. A MTB
    outboard bearing crankset has spacers, but they are only there to
    compensate for a the differences between 68mm and 73mm shells. Due to
    the design of the assembly, it doesn't look like there is a way to play
    with the chainline at all. I would love to hear that I am wrong on that
    subject.

    Nope, you are right.

    Quoted message said:


    So, like many other MTB frames, the 43.5mm chainline on this bike comes
    too close to the chainstays for comfort. I haven't actually tried it
    yet, but I really don't want to learn the hard way. Cannondale tech
    said they didn't think it would work and my measurements haven't been
    encouraging. The other option which looks like it may work is to use an
    Octalink or Isis crankset and instead of using the 108-109mm BB for
    doubles to get the 43.5mm chainline, use a 118mm BB designed for triples
    to get the chainline back to about 48mm. Opinions?

    On cross frames also-using an outboard bearing, road crank...makes for
    chainring interference with the chainstay. How about a square taper
    crank/BB, the spindle which comes in lots of lengths, to make the
    clearance and chainline as good as possible.

  3. Qui si parla Campagnolo says...

    Quoted message said:

    On cross frames also-using an outboard bearing, road crank...makes for
    chainring interference with the chainstay. How about a square taper
    crank/BB, the spindle which comes in lots of lengths, to make the
    clearance and chainline as good as possible.

    I thought about square taper, but there aren't very many options for
    compact. Campy makes a few very expensive ones, Centaur and Chorus
    carbon, but that is more than I wanted to spend. Other ones I've seen I
    had never heard much about them. Any recommendations?

  4. Barnard Frederick said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo says...

    Quoted message said:

    On cross frames also-using an outboard bearing, road crank...makes for
    chainring interference with the chainstay. How about a square taper
    crank/BB, the spindle which comes in lots of lengths, to make the
    clearance and chainline as good as possible.

    I thought about square taper, but there aren't very many options for
    compact. Campy makes a few very expensive ones, Centaur and Chorus
    carbon, but that is more than I wanted to spend. Other ones I've seen I
    had never heard much about them. Any recommendations?

    Sugino makes excellent, inexpensive cranks for square taper BBs. They're
    widely available too.

    There's nothing wrong with using an older crank either.

    Matt O.

  5. Barnard Frederick said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo says...

    Quoted message said:

    On cross frames also-using an outboard bearing, road crank...makes for
    chainring interference with the chainstay. How about a square taper
    crank/BB, the spindle which comes in lots of lengths, to make the
    clearance and chainline as good as possible.

    I thought about square taper, but there aren't very many options for
    compact. Campy makes a few very expensive ones, Centaur and Chorus
    carbon, but that is more than I wanted to spend. Other ones I've seen I
    had never heard much about them. Any recommendations?

    How about something like a Sugino XD? It comes as a 110/74 triple, but
    you can fit the rings of your choice and just leave the inner
    ("granny"😉 ring off. Nice stuff, available for under $50 with steel
    rings (which you won't be using). Sugino also makes a "compact double"
    version (i.e., no 74mmBCD inner ring mount for more money.

  6. Barnard Frederick said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo says...

    Quoted message said:

    On cross frames also-using an outboard bearing, road crank...makes for
    chainring interference with the chainstay. How about a square taper
    crank/BB, the spindle which comes in lots of lengths, to make the
    clearance and chainline as good as possible.

    I thought about square taper, but there aren't very many options for
    compact. Campy makes a few very expensive ones, Centaur and Chorus
    carbon, but that is more than I wanted to spend. Other ones I've seen I
    had never heard much about them. Any recommendations?

    One of the reasons I muck with this NG-Campag makes aluminum compacts
    starting with Mirage at about $115, Veloce at $130 and Centaur at
    $170...110mm BCD, very nice and with a $30 BB, very economical.

    Mirage is Veloce but bl;ack, Veloce is Centaur with less expensive
    rings, Centaur is Chorus quality rings but aluminum.

  7. Qui si parla Campagnolo says...

    Quoted message said:

    One of the reasons I muck with this NG-Campag makes aluminum compacts
    starting with Mirage at about $115, Veloce at $130 and Centaur at
    $170...110mm BCD, very nice and with a $30 BB, very economical.

    Mirage is Veloce but bl;ack, Veloce is Centaur with less expensive
    rings, Centaur is Chorus quality rings but aluminum.

    Thank you, that is great information. I haven't recently seen anything
    other than carbon compacts from Campy, but an aluminum Centaur crankset
    would be very cool. I could special order one if need be. The next
    question is: what is the spindle width for the typical 43.5mm
    chainline? 'Cuz what I need to do is get one that is 8-10mm wider to
    get an MTB style chainline. Am I correct in assuming that most square
    taper BB's will work? If Campy has one in the length I need, that would
    be great, but I could be persuaded to spend a few extra bux on a Phil
    Wood.

  8. Matt O'Toole says...

    Quoted message said:

    Sugino makes excellent, inexpensive cranks for square taper BBs. They're
    widely available too.

    There's nothing wrong with using an older crank either.

    Matt O.

    Thanks Matt & Oz. I'll check out Sugino. I believe I have owned
    several in the days of yore.

  9. Barnard Frederick said:

    Qui si parla Campagnolo says...

    Quoted message said:

    One of the reasons I muck with this NG-Campag makes aluminum compacts
    starting with Mirage at about $115, Veloce at $130 and Centaur at
    $170...110mm BCD, very nice and with a $30 BB, very economical.

    Mirage is Veloce but bl;ack, Veloce is Centaur with less expensive
    rings, Centaur is Chorus quality rings but aluminum.

    Thank you, that is great information. I haven't recently seen anything
    other than carbon compacts from Campy, but an aluminum Centaur crankset
    would be very cool. I could special order one if need be. The next
    question is: what is the spindle width for the typical 43.5mm
    chainline?

    111mm ISO taper

    'Cuz what I need to do is get one that is 8-10mm wider to

    Quoted message said:

    get an MTB style chainline. Am I correct in assuming that most square
    taper BB's will work? If Campy has one in the length I need, that would
    be great, but I could be persuaded to spend a few extra bux on a Phil
    Wood.

    To get 5mm more length of the BB-see Phil Wood. 'Most' BBs will work
    but not ideal.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.