Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Top Swing or conventional

Started by Paul · · Last activity · 4 posts · 751 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
19 September 2003
Last activity
19 September 2003
Original author
Paul
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
751
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This is probably a pretty basic question but could somebody explain the differance between a Top
    Swing and a conventional front derailleur?

    Since the cabling to my front mech. runs along the top tube I assume I need a top pull mech. (28.6
    mounting) but I'm not sure about top swing or conventional, would either do?

    Many thanks

    Paul.

  2. Paul said:

    could somebody explain the differance between a Top Swing and a conventional front derailleur?

    In a conventional derailleur, the cage is below the clamp. Top Swing reverses that arrangement.

    Quoted message said:

    Since the cabling to my front mech. runs along the top tube I assume I need a top pull mech.

    Right.

    Quoted message said:

    but I'm not sure about top swing or conventional, would either do?

    Some frames with ovalised or tapered seat tubes need one type or the other. Sometimes the position
    of a bottle cage boss can prevent the use of one type or the other. Most frames can use either.

    James Thomson

  3. Thanks James, that's a real help :-)

    With Kind Regards, Paul

  4. Paul said:

    This is probably a pretty basic question but could somebody explain the differance between a Top
    Swing and a conventional front derailleur?

    Since the cabling to my front mech. runs along the top tube I assume I need a top pull mech. (28.6
    mounting) but I'm not sure about top swing or conventional, would either do?

    The real difference (functionally) is that you can get a conventional FD that is set up for ~48
    tooth chainrings, while virtually all the bottom swings are designed for ~42. Both work fine - I
    don't really have a preference about performance other than the above.

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.