Just received mine this morning - pretty impressed! It's not even election
time.
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/zmp.htm
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
UK and Europe · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Just received mine this morning - pretty impressed! It's not even election
time.
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/zmp.htm
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
Quoted message said:Just received mine this morning - pretty impressed! It's not even
election time.
Did he mean he's a strong supporter of cycling, or a strange supporter of
cycling?
Simon Mason said:Just received mine this morning - pretty impressed! It's not even election
time.
Seen MartinM's letter? (other thread) I wonder if the MPs are
circulating among themselves a standard response to the CTC's standard
letter...
Still, it is reassuring when they take the trouble to reply - democracy
in action, and all that.
Haven't even written to my MP yet - I would prefer to draft my own
letter rather than use the CTC one cos there are a couple of lines in
the CTC letter I'm not keen to put my name to.
d.
davek said:Haven't even written to my MP yet - I would prefer to draft my own
letter rather than use the CTC one cos there are a couple of lines in
the CTC letter I'm not keen to put my name to.
Nothing to stop you editing what you send at the CTC's autowhinge
system. I certainly didn't send it "as is".
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
"Peter Clinch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Nothing to stop you editing what you send at the CTC's autowhinge
system.
Where is that, please, I seem to have missed it?
--
Martin Bulmer
Simon Mason said:Just received mine this morning - pretty impressed! It's not even election
time.
Got my reply a few days ago. Hope OCR is OK
H0USE OF COMMONS
LONDON SWIA OAA
Our ref: FD3987
6th March 2006
Dear Mr Gregory
Thank you for your email regarding the revision of the Highway Code. I
am certainly a strong supporter of cycling and believe the Highway Code
is an important resource for road users.
I recognise the concerns you raise about the wording of the new Code. It
is my understanding, however, that the new Code does not say cyclists
'should' use cycle facilities rather that they should
do so 'where practicable'. It is, however, important that the legal
consequences of the wording particularly on the use of cycle helmets -
are fully considered. As such, I will happily write to the Minister of
State for Transport, Dr Stephen Ladyman MP, making him aware of your
concerns.
May I suggest that you also participate in the consultation on the new
Code? To view the revised Code and comment on the changes visit:
www.dsa.gov.uk/highwaycode. Or write to:
Publications Department,
Driving Standards Agency,
The Training Centre,
Harrowden Lane,
Cardington,
Bedford MK44 3ST,
(Please mark your response for the attention of Karen Lees).
In addition I will pass your letter to the Shadow Transport Team who are
currently considering the Government's Road Safety Bill. I am sure they
will be interested to read your comments on the design of cycling
provision and the need for clearer advice for motorists on their
interaction with cyclists.
I want our roads to be as safe as possible for all road users. Thank you
for taking the time to write to me.
Yours sincerely
..MA_
Mark Harper MP
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Nothing to stop you editing what you send at the CTC's autowhinge
system.Where is that, please, I seem to have missed it?
Mark Thompson said:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Nothing to stop you editing what you send at the CTC's autowhinge
system.Where is that, please, I seem to have missed it?
thanks
--
Martin Bulmer
Hmm; perhaps they have a similar set up on the House of Commons website
to the CTC that auto-composes a response and inserts your address and
MP ;-)
"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Simon Mason said:Just received mine this morning - pretty impressed! It's not even
election time.
Got my reply a few days ago. Hope OCR is OKH0USE OF COMMONS
LONDON SWIA OAA
Our ref: FD3987
6th March 2006
Dear Mr Gregory
Thank you for your email regarding the revision of the Highway Code. I am
certainly a strong supporter of cycling and believe the Highway Code is an
important resource for road users.
Ah, but mine said "stronge" supporter, so mine was not an automated reply!
--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net
Dan Gregory said:Got my reply a few days ago. Hope OCR is OK
H0USE OF COMMONS
LONDON SWIA OAA
Our ref: FD3987
6th March 2006
Dear Mr Gregory
Thank you for your email regarding the revision of the Highway Code. I
am certainly a strong supporter of cycling and believe the Highway Code
is an important resource for road users.
I recognise the concerns you raise about the wording of the new Code. It
is my understanding, however, that the new Code does not say cyclists
'should' use cycle facilities rather that they should
do so 'where practicable'.
He's wrong. It's cycle routes that should be used where practicable, as
at present. The new rule 58 adds "and cycle facilities such as ...
where they are provided". That is a clear instruction to use the
facilities. Note that the wording does not exclude cycle lanes from the
instruction although they are not named specifically in the new rule
58.
--
Dave...
MartinM twisted the electrons to say:
Quoted message said:Hmm; perhaps they have a similar set up on the House of Commons website
to the CTC that auto-composes a response and inserts your address and
MP ;-)
Well if there is, it would appear that Hugh Bayley (York's MP) isn't
using it. All I got was a letter saying he'd forwarded my communication
to Alistair Darling ...
--
These opinions might not even be mine ...
Let alone connected with my employer ...
On 10 Mar 2006 08:01:29 -0800, "davek" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Seen MartinM's letter? (other thread) I wonder if the MPs are
circulating among themselves a standard response to the CTC's standard
letter...
Perhaps lazy MPs copy the complaints to more diligent MPs, using a
false name, then copy the reply they get to the original complainant.
--
Let us have a moment of silence for all Americans who
are now stuck in traffic on their way to a health club
to ride a stationary bicycle. -
Congressman Earl Blumenauer (Oregon)
On 12 Mar 2006 16:10:22 GMT, Alistair Gunn <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:MartinM twisted the electrons to say:
Quoted message said:Hmm; perhaps they have a similar set up on the House of Commons website
to the CTC that auto-composes a response and inserts your address and
MP ;-)Well if there is, it would appear that Hugh Bayley (York's MP) isn't
using it. All I got was a letter saying he'd forwarded my communication
to Alistair Darling ...
Maybe the auto-reply is based on party political lines.
--
Let us have a moment of silence for all Americans who
are now stuck in traffic on their way to a health club
to ride a stationary bicycle. -
Congressman Earl Blumenauer (Oregon)
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.