Goodbye!

In article <[email hidden]>,

David said:

I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut off and
this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about something
about my affinity for sheep.

So CYA!

Nice try TBR..... ;-)
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

Nice try TBR.

Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease! I can do better than that.

David said:

I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut off and
this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about something
about my affinity for sheep.

So CYA!

Ah, you lie!

(I noticed your /sheep/ish grin.)

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut off
and
this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about something
about my affinity for sheep.

So CYA!

Ah, you lie!

(I noticed your /sheep/ish grin.)

LOL
Curt - I would never lie to my friends. It's that broken record that got me
in trouble - he said there was a pasture nearby and I just got carried away.

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:23:20 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut off
and
this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about something
about my affinity for sheep.

So CYA!

Ah, you lie!

(I noticed your /sheep/ish grin.)

LOL
Curt - I would never lie to my friends. It's that broken record that got me
in trouble - he said there was a pasture nearby and I just got carried away.

Come on David, you just like winding up Dolly, who can't wait to take
the bait after having given the whole of Usenet intimate details of
her entire family.

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:23:20 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

>I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut off
>and
>this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about something
>about my affinity for sheep.
>
>So CYA!

Ah, you lie!

(I noticed your /sheep/ish grin.)

LOL
Curt - I would never lie to my friends. It's that broken record that got
me
in trouble - he said there was a pasture nearby and I just got carried
away.

Come on David, you just like winding up Dolly, who can't wait to take
the bait after having given the whole of Usenet intimate details of
her entire family.

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her so called killfiles for
months but it seems she is very closely monitoring those she is allegedly
killfiling.

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:40:20 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:23:20 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> David <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut off
>>and
>>this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about something
>>about my affinity for sheep.
>>
>>So CYA!
>
> Ah, you lie!
>
> (I noticed your /sheep/ish grin.)
>
LOL
Curt - I would never lie to my friends. It's that broken record that got
me
in trouble - he said there was a pasture nearby and I just got carried
away.

Come on David, you just like winding up Dolly, who can't wait to take
the bait after having given the whole of Usenet intimate details of
her entire family.

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her so called killfiles for
months but it seems she is very closely monitoring those she is allegedly
killfiling.

I'm surprised that you still "find it strange" at this hypocritical
yet typical behaviour of the alleged "killfiler".

The only person that *really* gets "killfiled" (perhaps) is one that
just posts rubbish and filth, making no contribution whatsoever, and
who is of no interest to anyone.

Most of John Williams' so-called "trolls" don't fit into that
category, and the alleged "killfilers" are only hiding in order not to
be involved in lively exchanges with those that have exposed their
obvious inadequacies, or revealed them for the frauds they really are.

However, the resulting blandness diminishes this once great Group.

Have a great Sunday mate - you know I will have another 'quiet one'!
;o)

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

SNIP

Quoted message said:

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her
so called killfiles for months but it seems she is very
closely monitoring those she is allegedly killfiling.

And this is not the type of behaviour that is solely her domain, but
an example of childishness and idiocy that clearly transcends Usenet.

The student who holds their hands over their ears. "Look, I know you
can still hear me." And they begin to hum. "And that's not working
either."

The driver who cuts you off and then looks straight ahead when you
pass them slowly at the red traffic light you both reach at the same
time despite their ill-advised driving technique.

But, yes, David, *trumpeting the plonk* is, pathetically, a Usenet
norm.

The man who is supposedly not in favor of so-called Internet trolls,
but creates an entire Web page which lends celebrity or at least
attention to individuals he considers trolls.

The Usenet member who announces their departure from the newsgroup,
bidding heartfelt farewells... and then returning to their regular
posting habits seemingly immediately.

And, yes, the person who loudly proclaims "BOZO BIN!" and then
continues to refer, even reply, to the person they've just (but not
really) killfiled.

They will offer excuses such as "Oh, I was reading Google Groups and
saw this and just had to comment." Right. Or they'll reply to their
killfiled person via the quoted words that appear in another patron's
post. Uh huh.

Peeple am st00pit.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

SNIP

Quoted message said:

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her
so called killfiles for months but it seems she is very
closely monitoring those she is allegedly killfiling.

And this is not the type of behaviour that is solely her domain, but
an example of childishness and idiocy that clearly transcends Usenet.

Or your lack of understanding of killfiles. Curt, I don't have you
kill-filed, but I have David set so all his letters are marked as read.
It is just completely untrue to suggest that I "closely monitor" his
posts - the opposite is true, I almost never read his posts. In the
case I replied to yesterday it was in a thread I started about MY kid.
So I was following THAT thread. (Even so, I didn't read everything by
every troll.)

When I discovered that TBR was making affirmative plans to molest my
specific kid I pointed out that it had crossed the line from childish
stupidity into criminal behavior. It had, and it's not acceptable and I
thought it was worth pointing out.

That's the nightmare of killfiles, actually: that the trolls are
crossing over from idiotic usenet nuisances into real life threats
without you noticing.

So, Curt, are you okay with this? You think it's childish and idiotic
of me to object to TBR - who lives a half hour drive from me - from
making plans to seek me out with David? You still think he's funny?

Dally

Curt James said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

SNIP

Quoted message said:

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her
so called killfiles for months but it seems she is very
closely monitoring those she is allegedly killfiling.

And this is not the type of behaviour that is solely her domain, but
an example of childishness and idiocy that clearly transcends Usenet.

The student who holds their hands over their ears. "Look, I know you
can still hear me." And they begin to hum. "And that's not working
either."

The driver who cuts you off and then looks straight ahead when you
pass them slowly at the red traffic light you both reach at the same
time despite their ill-advised driving technique.

But, yes, David, *trumpeting the plonk* is, pathetically, a Usenet
norm.

The man who is supposedly not in favor of so-called Internet trolls,
but creates an entire Web page which lends celebrity or at least
attention to individuals he considers trolls.

The Usenet member who announces their departure from the newsgroup,
bidding heartfelt farewells... and then returning to their regular
posting habits seemingly immediately.

And, yes, the person who loudly proclaims "BOZO BIN!" and then
continues to refer, even reply, to the person they've just (but not
really) killfiled.

They will offer excuses such as "Oh, I was reading Google Groups and
saw this and just had to comment." Right. Or they'll reply to their
killfiled person via the quoted words that appear in another patron's
post. Uh huh.

Peeple am st00pit.

No they aren't "st00pit" Curt, they are cunning lying [censored], who
are trying to discredit people in an underhand way, because they can't
beat them face to face.

They are a couple of silly little losers and doing the Group a great
deal of harm.

Dolly is still smarting over the latest 'outrage' and trying to figure
out how to stop making herself and her family so exposed and
vulnerable. Do you have a solution for her? ;o)

Dally said:

When I discovered that TBR was making affirmative plans to molest my
specific kid I pointed out that it had crossed the line from childish
stupidity into criminal behavior.

So idiot, did you find out it's NOT criminal behavior? I hope they
explained it to you. Fat idiots like you deserve every bit of problem
you get, because you bring it on yourself. You bring new meaning to
the word "easy".

Dally <[email hidden]> wrote:

[...]

Quoted message said:

So, Curt, are you okay with this? You think it's childish and idiotic
of me to object to TBR - who lives a half hour drive from me - from
making plans to seek me out with David? You still think he's funny?

I suspect it was satire. Inappropriate, that is true, but satire
nonetheless. Also, have you actually contacted the police regarding
this matter? I don't believe you have. Because, and again as in the
past with people who find it necessary to squawk in public, you're not
interested in stopping him from doing anything. What you're doing,
imo, is jumping up on a soapbox while screaming "LOOKIT ME!"

Your kid is six years old and was invited to practice at a dojo in
your area? I read that somewhere in MFW and had to laugh. You're an
attention seeker and not much else. You're also as much of a troll as
anyone else in this newsgroup. We all, I suspect, enjoy attention.
And, yeah, we all troll for attention. Semantics. But don't put on
your face of indignation and ask if I'm /okay with this/.

If you're concerned about the continued safety of your child
(especially when you're aware that a so-called Well Known Troll lives
a mere half-hour drive from your home) then don't comment on your
child to a Usenet group. Just as Charles pointed out, Dally.

Pssst, I still think YOU're funny.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Dally said:

Curt James said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

SNIP

Quoted message said:

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her
so called killfiles for months but it seems she is very
closely monitoring those she is allegedly killfiling.

And this is not the type of behaviour that is solely her domain, but
an example of childishness and idiocy that clearly transcends Usenet.

Or your lack of understanding of killfiles. Curt, I don't have you
kill-filed, but I have David set so all his letters are marked as read.
It is just completely untrue to suggest that I "closely monitor" his
posts - the opposite is true, I almost never read his posts. In the
case I replied to yesterday it was in a thread I started about MY kid.
So I was following THAT thread. (Even so, I didn't read everything by
every troll.)

When I discovered that TBR was making affirmative plans to molest my
specific kid I pointed out that it had crossed the line from childish
stupidity into criminal behavior. It had, and it's not acceptable and I
thought it was worth pointing out.

That's the nightmare of killfiles, actually: that the trolls are
crossing over from idiotic usenet nuisances into real life threats
without you noticing.

If you waddle about with your head up your fat [censored], it is also
difficult to whistle your dog loud enough for him to hear you!

Quoted message said:

So, Curt, are you okay with this? You think it's childish and idiotic
of me to object to TBR - who lives a half hour drive from me - from
making plans to seek me out with David? You still think he's funny?

You squeal for effect only you silly wench. It's you that sticks your
bum out of the window, and then complains when someone is ill all over
your house frontage as a consequence of the revolting view!

Curt James said:

Dally <[email hidden]> wrote:

[...]

Quoted message said:

So, Curt, are you okay with this? You think it's childish and idiotic
of me to object to TBR - who lives a half hour drive from me - from
making plans to seek me out with David? You still think he's funny?

I suspect it was satire. Inappropriate, that is true, but satire
nonetheless.

You get to feel laissez-faire about it. I don't.

Quoted message said:

What you're doing,
imo, is jumping up on a soapbox while screaming "LOOKIT ME!"

Or talking with my friends. Your call. (I suspect you're projecting.)

Quoted message said:

Your kid is six years old and was invited to practice at a dojo in
your area? I read that somewhere in MFW and had to laugh.

His father & two siblings go. He's been "invited" several times - by
his father, by the instructors who know our family, by his brother.
"C'mon, why don't you come, too?" That's an invitation. What's so
funny/strange/unbelievable about that? The dojo is an option - more so
for him than for most six-year-olds, I suspect.

Quoted message said:

But don't put on
your face of indignation and ask if I'm /okay with this/.

You think this is all a game. It's not. This is a real life and I'm
part of a usenet commmunity. You think we're all silly voices playing
in your head for your amusement. That's the troll philosophy. I'm in a
different reality than you are.

Quoted message said:

If you're concerned about the continued safety of your child
(especially when you're aware that a so-called Well Known Troll lives
a mere half-hour drive from your home) then don't comment on your
child to a Usenet group.

What an [censored]. Saying I'm not allowed to talk about my family if I
don't want them molested? Get a grip. It's NOT okay to threaten my
family. It's really not. Even if I give out personal information, it's
STILL not okay to threaten to harm a child. Even if you THINK IT MIGHT
BE SATIRE. It crosses a line that isn't okay to cross.

Dally

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:40:20 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"JRH" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:23:20 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>
wrote:

>
>"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:[email hidden]...
>> David <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>I've just been advised by my service provider that I will now be cut
>>>off
>>>and
>>>this must be my last post. Seems someone has complained about
>>>something
>>>about my affinity for sheep.
>>>
>>>So CYA!
>>
>> Ah, you lie!
>>
>> (I noticed your /sheep/ish grin.)
>>
>LOL
>Curt - I would never lie to my friends. It's that broken record that got
>me
>in trouble - he said there was a pasture nearby and I just got carried
>away.
>

Come on David, you just like winding up Dolly, who can't wait to take
the bait after having given the whole of Usenet intimate details of
her entire family.

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her so called killfiles for
months but it seems she is very closely monitoring those she is allegedly
killfiling.

I'm surprised that you still "find it strange" at this hypocritical
yet typical behaviour of the alleged "killfiler".

The only person that *really* gets "killfiled" (perhaps) is one that
just posts rubbish and filth, making no contribution whatsoever, and
who is of no interest to anyone.

Most of John Williams' so-called "trolls" don't fit into that
category, and the alleged "killfilers" are only hiding in order not to
be involved in lively exchanges with those that have exposed their
obvious inadequacies, or revealed them for the frauds they really are.

However, the resulting blandness diminishes this once great Group.

Have a great Sunday mate - you know I will have another 'quiet one'!
;o)

Maybe when you get a chance, let me know how you get to 'troll' from 'troll
enabler'. When I got this job, I was told there was plenty of room for
advancement.

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David <[email hidden]> wrote:

SNIP

Quoted message said:

I find it strange that she has been trumpeting her
so called killfiles for months but it seems she is very
closely monitoring those she is allegedly killfiling.

And this is not the type of behaviour that is solely her domain, but
an example of childishness and idiocy that clearly transcends Usenet.

The student who holds their hands over their ears. "Look, I know you
can still hear me." And they begin to hum. "And that's not working
either."

The driver who cuts you off and then looks straight ahead when you
pass them slowly at the red traffic light you both reach at the same
time despite their ill-advised driving technique.

But, yes, David, *trumpeting the plonk* is, pathetically, a Usenet
norm.

The man who is supposedly not in favor of so-called Internet trolls,
but creates an entire Web page which lends celebrity or at least
attention to individuals he considers trolls.

The Usenet member who announces their departure from the newsgroup,
bidding heartfelt farewells... and then returning to their regular
posting habits seemingly immediately.

And, yes, the person who loudly proclaims "BOZO BIN!" and then
continues to refer, even reply, to the person they've just (but not
really) killfiled.

They will offer excuses such as "Oh, I was reading Google Groups and
saw this and just had to comment." Right. Or they'll reply to their
killfiled person via the quoted words that appear in another patron's
post. Uh huh.

Peeple am st00pit.

People certainly am stoopit Curt. The key here is they want it both ways.
Can't bear to miss anything yet don't have the discipline to carry on the
facade of pretending to killfile when the opportunity presents itself. You
are dead right - it's all about attention seeking (as you pointed out just
lately)

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Dally <[email hidden]> wrote:

[...]

Quoted message said:

So, Curt, are you okay with this? You think it's childish and idiotic
of me to object to TBR - who lives a half hour drive from me - from
making plans to seek me out with David? You still think he's funny?

I suspect it was satire. Inappropriate, that is true, but satire
nonetheless. Also, have you actually contacted the police regarding
this matter? I don't believe you have. Because, and again as in the
past with people who find it necessary to squawk in public, you're not
interested in stopping him from doing anything. What you're doing,
imo, is jumping up on a soapbox while screaming "LOOKIT ME!"

Your kid is six years old and was invited to practice at a dojo in
your area? I read that somewhere in MFW and had to laugh. You're an
attention seeker and not much else. You're also as much of a troll as
anyone else in this newsgroup. We all, I suspect, enjoy attention.
And, yeah, we all troll for attention. Semantics. But don't put on
your face of indignation and ask if I'm /okay with this/.

If you're concerned about the continued safety of your child
(especially when you're aware that a so-called Well Known Troll lives
a mere half-hour drive from your home) then don't comment on your
child to a Usenet group. Just as Charles pointed out, Dally.

Pssst, I still think YOU're funny.

Curt, I think you are right on the money here. What we have here is an
'indignant attention seeker'. Perfect description, (What;s wrong with a 6
year old being 'invited' to attend a dojo? When my kid was 5 he was invited
to attend a finger painting class. All he had to do was pay a $10 fee. What
Dally is trying to say is that her 6 year old has this obvious talent and is
being sought by dojos far and wide. In fact the local dojo is offering him a
kiddie scholarship he shows that much promise. He has great traps and is
strong and wiry. Who wouldn't want this snively brat in their dojo?
Specially if the kid has a sawbuck on him)

Dally said:

What an [censored]. Saying I'm not allowed to talk about my family if I
don't want them molested? Get a grip. It's NOT okay to threaten my
family. It's really not. Even if I give out personal information, it's
STILL not okay to threaten to harm a child. Even if you THINK IT MIGHT
BE SATIRE. It crosses a line that isn't okay to cross.

Yes, you are an [censored]. Nobody threatened your child, anywhere,
anytime. Get a fing grip, you really need mental help.

Lee Michaels said:

It also points out how the trolls are dilgently trying to deny the use of
the newsgroup to others who want to have valid discussions.

Working quite well too.