Sun uv a gun

Kantou said:

Bill Davidson finally had his comcast account
nuked for abuse! That took some doing on
my part, and you're all welcome!

He now has an account with charter.com
( 68.186.244.138 ), these fine folks will not put
up with his abuse the way comcast did, so it
will be much easier to have him yanked now!
aaaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Happy New Year.

Just tell me that you're not John Williams a.k.a. JMW. I'd like to
think his troll faq and bluster about this, that, and the other were
all for naught.

Regardless, well done. Happy New Year to you, too, Kantou.

--

In article said:

Bill Davidson finally had his comcast account nuked for abuse! That took
some doing on my part, and you're all welcome!

He now has an account with charter.com ( 68.186.244.138 )
, these fine folks will not put up with his abuse the way comcast did, so it
will be much easier to have him yanked now! aaaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Happy New Year.

Cheers!!! :-)

I wondered why I'd not had to re-killfile him the past couple of days.

Thanks!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

Kantou said:

Bill Davidson finally had his comcast account nuked for abuse! That took
some doing on my part, and you're all welcome!

He now has an account with charter.com ( 68.186.244.138 )
, these fine folks will not put up with his abuse the way comcast did, so it
will be much easier to have him yanked now! aaaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Happy New Year.

Excellent. Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be
interesting. Since a few insist that there were no trolls aside from
Davidson, we'll see whether that turns out to be true.

JMW said:

Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be
interesting. Since a few insist that there were no
trolls aside from Davidson, we'll see whether that
turns out to be true.

You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.

Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your hype or
blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand, was obvious schtick and
satire designed to get a rise.

And what group consensus?

--

Curt James said:

JMW said:

Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be
interesting. Since a few insist that there were no
trolls aside from Davidson, we'll see whether that
turns out to be true.

You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.

Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your hype or
blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand, was obvious schtick and
satire designed to get a rise.

And what group consensus?

Allow me to explain, Curt ...

You and your compatriots appear to think it's all the fault of me and
maybe a few other MFW regulars. If that's the case, then consider
these questions:

If it's all our fault, why can't anyone in rec.arts.bodyart stand you,
either?

If it's all our fault, why was Hudson one of the reasons that
alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated was created?

If it's all our fault, why are people already killfiling Hudson in
rec.sport.rugby.union?

A bit of advice for you, Curt:

If everywhere you go smells like dog [censored], check the soles of your
shoes.

J M Would-you-look-at-the-[censored]-on-that-dog's-fur? <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Curt James said:

JMW said:

Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.

Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your
hype or blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand,
was obvious schtick and satire designed to get a rise.

And what group consensus?

Allow me to explain, Curt ...

I suspected you couldn't hold your tongue. The so-called troll enabler
/enabler/ speaks!

Quoted message said:

You and your compatriots appear to think it's all the
fault

^^^^^^
Interesting.

Quoted message said:

of me and maybe a few other MFW regulars.

Who would those MFW regulars be? Who is in your so-called corner?
Dally? Hanson? Hodges? Om? David?

Dally posts all around. Om is even-handed and diplomatic. David is
considerate across the board for the most part. Even Hanson has
replied in a sensible non-confrontational manner recently. Hodges just
got back from his self-imposed exile, so I wouldn't be so quick to
count him as /your/ so-called compatriot simply because I don't think
any of those people are as stupifyingly arrogant as you seem to be.

And what fault are you placing? What fault? What trolls?

Overall, what exactly is your *problem*?

This is all post and reply. Again, what /fault/?

Quoted message said:

If that's the case, then consider these questions:

If it's all our fault, why can't anyone in rec.arts.bodyart
stand you, either?

Either?

I wasn't aware that NO ONE here could stand me. Because, hey, either
would indicate that both MFW and RAB /can't stand me/.

And re RAB, been over there recently? Just had a pleasant reply from a
patron interested in a tattoo cover-up. Your statement is incorrect.
However, yes, I typically have difficulties with pompous
I-am-the-center-of-the-universe types. It's your lucky day.

Quoted message said:

If it's all our fault, why was Hudson one of the reasons that
alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated was created?

heh

So, you're telling me that there had been (or is) an
alt.support.anxiety-panic around but Charles drove them to such a
state of anxious panic that they created a moderated version?

I suspect that patrons of anxiety-panic wouldn't need much prodding.
Kinda like _alt.just.one.more.ounce.of.pressure_ getting that one
added ounce. Regardless, I'm not interested in your war with Hudson,
Williams. He can take care of himself. Can you?

Quoted message said:

If it's all our fault, why are people already killfiling Hudson in
rec.sport.rugby.union?

Because you suck? Just a guess.

Seriously (well, that WAS serious), take all this to Charles'
doorstep, not mine because 1) I don't necessarily believe a word you
say and 2) I'm not Charles. But, hey, this is an UNmoderated
newsgroup, so blather away. Unlike you, I don't need a killfile - oh,
wait, you apparently don't need one either - to decide who to reply to
and who to ignore.

Quoted message said:

A bit of advice for you, Curt:

If everywhere you go smells like dog [censored], check the soles
of your shoes.

You are so profound.

How about this one? If the soles of my shoes are covered in dog [censored]
then perhaps I should stop kicking [censored]-assed dogs in the rear. Not
that I'd do that, but it certainly offers a more accurate image.

--

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

J M Would-you-look-at-the-[censored]-on-that-dog's-fur? <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Curt James said:

JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:

>Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be

<snip>

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.

Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your
hype or blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand,
was obvious schtick and satire designed to get a rise.

And what group consensus?

Allow me to explain, Curt ...

I suspected you couldn't hold your tongue. The so-called troll enabler
/enabler/ speaks!

Quoted message said:

You and your compatriots appear to think it's all the
fault

^^^^^^
Interesting.

Quoted message said:

of me and maybe a few other MFW regulars.

Who would those MFW regulars be? Who is in your so-called corner?
Dally? Hanson? Hodges? Om? David?

Dally posts all around. Om is even-handed and diplomatic. David is
considerate across the board for the most part. Even Hanson has
replied in a sensible non-confrontational manner recently. Hodges just
got back from his self-imposed exile, so I wouldn't be so quick to
count him as /your/ so-called compatriot simply because I don't think
any of those people are as stupifyingly arrogant as you seem to be.

And what fault are you placing? What fault? What trolls?

Overall, what exactly is your *problem*?

This is all post and reply. Again, what /fault/?

Quoted message said:

If that's the case, then consider these questions:

If it's all our fault, why can't anyone in rec.arts.bodyart
stand you, either?

Either?

I wasn't aware that NO ONE here could stand me. Because, hey, either
would indicate that both MFW and RAB /can't stand me/.

And re RAB, been over there recently? Just had a pleasant reply from a
patron interested in a tattoo cover-up. Your statement is incorrect.
However, yes, I typically have difficulties with pompous
I-am-the-center-of-the-universe types. It's your lucky day.

Quoted message said:

If it's all our fault, why was Hudson one of the reasons that
alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated was created?

heh

So, you're telling me that there had been (or is) an
alt.support.anxiety-panic around but Charles drove them to such a
state of anxious panic that they created a moderated version?

I suspect that patrons of anxiety-panic wouldn't need much prodding.
Kinda like _alt.just.one.more.ounce.of.pressure_ getting that one
added ounce. Regardless, I'm not interested in your war with Hudson,
Williams. He can take care of himself. Can you?

Quoted message said:

If it's all our fault, why are people already killfiling Hudson in
rec.sport.rugby.union?

Because you suck? Just a guess.

Seriously (well, that WAS serious), take all this to Charles'
doorstep, not mine because 1) I don't necessarily believe a word you
say and 2) I'm not Charles. But, hey, this is an UNmoderated
newsgroup, so blather away. Unlike you, I don't need a killfile - oh,
wait, you apparently don't need one either - to decide who to reply to
and who to ignore.

Quoted message said:

A bit of advice for you, Curt:

If everywhere you go smells like dog [censored], check the soles
of your shoes.

You are so profound.

How about this one? If the soles of my shoes are covered in dog [censored]
then perhaps I should stop kicking [censored]-assed dogs in the rear. Not
that I'd do that, but it certainly offers a more accurate image.

Funny this thing about digging around other newsgroups and using it as a
'weapon' against those you wish to get a leg up. Suppose someone from
another group looks around MFW. How easy would it be to go back and say
about the following people - JMW, JRH, Curt, David, Dally and a number of
others - "no one in MFW can stand you" -

Curt James wrote:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest with
everyone. I'm just wondering - do you EXERCISE? Or is this your
exercise, fighting with people on MFW? What BRINGS you to this place?

Dally

"Dally" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Curt James wrote:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest with
everyone. I'm just wondering - do you EXERCISE? Or is this your
exercise, fighting with people on MFW? What BRINGS you to this place?

Dally

Just wondering - why are you fuelling the pissing contest? Being an athlete
and all there must be enormous pressure on your time. Any handicapped or
geriatric events coming up that you might be entered in?

JMW said:

Curt James said:

JMW said:

Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be
interesting. Since a few insist that there were no
trolls aside from Davidson, we'll see whether that
turns out to be true.

You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.

Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your hype or
blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand, was obvious schtick and
satire designed to get a rise.

And what group consensus?

Allow me to explain, Curt ...

You and your compatriots appear to think it's all the fault of me and
maybe a few other MFW regulars. If that's the case, then consider
these questions:

If it's all our fault, why can't anyone in rec.arts.bodyart stand you,
either?

If it's all our fault, why was Hudson one of the reasons that
alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated was created?

If it's all our fault, why are people already killfiling Hudson in
rec.sport.rugby.union?

A bit of advice for you, Curt:

If everywhere you go smells like dog [censored], check the soles of your
shoes.

It's all about Hudson for you John Williams because he has got you
taped, like he has those control freaks and "trolls" in the only two
other groups in which he has posted.

They too don't like it up them, and they thrash about for his
amusement, just like you, great big fraud that you are.

On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:39:19 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

J M Would-you-look-at-the-[censored]-on-that-dog's-fur? <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Curt James <[email hidden]> wrote:
>JMW <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>>Group consensus on whether trolls remain will be

<snip>

Quoted message said:

>You're a worse troll than Davidson ever was.
>
>Amazingly, it would seem that you actually believe your
>hype or blather. Davidson's input, on the other hand,
>was obvious schtick and satire designed to get a rise.
>
>And what group consensus?

Allow me to explain, Curt ...

I suspected you couldn't hold your tongue. The so-called troll enabler
/enabler/ speaks!

Quoted message said:

You and your compatriots appear to think it's all the
fault

^^^^^^
Interesting.

Quoted message said:

of me and maybe a few other MFW regulars.

Who would those MFW regulars be? Who is in your so-called corner?
Dally? Hanson? Hodges? Om? David?

Dally posts all around. Om is even-handed and diplomatic. David is
considerate across the board for the most part. Even Hanson has
replied in a sensible non-confrontational manner recently. Hodges just
got back from his self-imposed exile, so I wouldn't be so quick to
count him as /your/ so-called compatriot simply because I don't think
any of those people are as stupifyingly arrogant as you seem to be.

And what fault are you placing? What fault? What trolls?

Overall, what exactly is your *problem*?

This is all post and reply. Again, what /fault/?

Quoted message said:

If that's the case, then consider these questions:

If it's all our fault, why can't anyone in rec.arts.bodyart
stand you, either?

Either?

I wasn't aware that NO ONE here could stand me. Because, hey, either
would indicate that both MFW and RAB /can't stand me/.

And re RAB, been over there recently? Just had a pleasant reply from a
patron interested in a tattoo cover-up. Your statement is incorrect.
However, yes, I typically have difficulties with pompous
I-am-the-center-of-the-universe types. It's your lucky day.

Quoted message said:

If it's all our fault, why was Hudson one of the reasons that
alt.support.anxiety-panic.moderated was created?

heh

So, you're telling me that there had been (or is) an
alt.support.anxiety-panic around but Charles drove them to such a
state of anxious panic that they created a moderated version?

I suspect that patrons of anxiety-panic wouldn't need much prodding.
Kinda like _alt.just.one.more.ounce.of.pressure_ getting that one
added ounce. Regardless, I'm not interested in your war with Hudson,
Williams. He can take care of himself. Can you?

Quoted message said:

If it's all our fault, why are people already killfiling Hudson in
rec.sport.rugby.union?

Because you suck? Just a guess.

Seriously (well, that WAS serious), take all this to Charles'
doorstep, not mine because 1) I don't necessarily believe a word you
say and 2) I'm not Charles. But, hey, this is an UNmoderated
newsgroup, so blather away. Unlike you, I don't need a killfile - oh,
wait, you apparently don't need one either - to decide who to reply to
and who to ignore.

Quoted message said:

A bit of advice for you, Curt:

If everywhere you go smells like dog [censored], check the soles
of your shoes.

You are so profound.

How about this one? If the soles of my shoes are covered in dog [censored]
then perhaps I should stop kicking [censored]-assed dogs in the rear. Not
that I'd do that, but it certainly offers a more accurate image.

Funny this thing about digging around other newsgroups and using it as a
'weapon' against those you wish to get a leg up. Suppose someone from
another group looks around MFW. How easy would it be to go back and say
about the following people - JMW, JRH, Curt, David, Dally and a number of
others - "no one in MFW can stand you" -

Too near the truth David.

Dally said:

Curt James wrote:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest with
everyone. I'm just wondering - do you EXERCISE? Or is this your
exercise, fighting with people on MFW? What BRINGS you to this place?

Dolly, why don't you stop "trolling" before you get a big kick up the
crutch again?

David said:

Funny this thing about digging around other newsgroups and
using it as a 'weapon' against those you wish to get a leg up.

He was 1) incorrect and 2) lazy about his digging, though.

Quoted message said:

Suppose someone from another group looks around MFW.
How easy would it be to go back and say about the following
people - JMW, JRH, Curt, David, Dally and a number of
others - "no one in MFW can stand you" -

Hmm. Well, they all could have that pointed at them. Except you, of
course! You're simply smashing. I've always been a fan. :o)

Seriously (wait, that WAS serious), it honestly couldn't be applied to
anyone as each of those listed has their fans or, at least, people who
have treated them with respect and kindness.

JMW - Hanson, Hodges, et al.
JRH - yours truly, you, et al.
You - yours truly, JRH, et al.
Dally - yours truly, Om, et al.
And, yeah, even me - JRH, you, et al.

Et al., btw, is the abbreviation for the Latin phrase et alii meaning
"and others." I was going to joke and say et al. was Latin for Om, but
I got hung up by Dally so far as the kindness and respect thing goes.

Sorry, gurlfren.

And, of course, David, you're right. That choice of 'weapon' could be
applied to anyone. It'd be inaccurate - as it was when what'shisface
used it - but, hey, all's fair in love and newsgroups, right?

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Dally said:

Curt James wrote:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest

Pissing contest? Hey, that's my phrase!

Quoted message said:

with everyone. I'm just wondering - do you EXERCISE?

Yes!

Quoted message said:

Or is this your exercise, fighting with people on MFW?

And yes!

Quoted message said:

What BRINGS you to this place?

I'd been here long ago, but the origin of my most recent entry to MFW
was to inquire about who had won a Mr. Olympia competition. Your
bestestest buddy opened her mouth in a negative manner and I decided
to stay.

Credit where credit's due, of course. :o)

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights/msg/0a7239a603afc737

Hey, mica, it's still spelled i-n-s-i-p-i-d-n-e-s-s.

Hth!

HA! I see that ol' JMW was going by John M. Williams at that time and
his affection for the word troll was in full effect then as well as
now. Certain things never change, I guess.

--
Curt
http://curtjames.com/

Curt James said:

Dally said:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest

Pissing contest? Hey, that's my phrase!

Well, kinda ... http://tinyurl.com/7kh4j

"JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Curt James said:

Dally said:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest

Pissing contest? Hey, that's my phrase!

Well, kinda ... http://tinyurl.com/7kh4j

That's good stuff JMW. Sounds like they have more fun in rec.arts.bodyart
that we do here!

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

Funny this thing about digging around other newsgroups and
using it as a 'weapon' against those you wish to get a leg up.

He was 1) incorrect and 2) lazy about his digging, though.

Yes, but you have to give him credit - he has a lot of people and a lot of
newsgoups to monitor. How thorough can he be?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Suppose someone from another group looks around MFW.
How easy would it be to go back and say about the following
people - JMW, JRH, Curt, David, Dally and a number of
others - "no one in MFW can stand you" -

Hmm. Well, they all could have that pointed at them. Except you, of
course! You're simply smashing. I've always been a fan. :o)

Sure!

Quoted message said:

Seriously

you mean you weren't??

Quoted message said:

(wait, that WAS serious), it honestly couldn't be applied to
anyone as each of those listed has their fans or, at least, people who
have treated them with respect and kindness.

JMW - Hanson, Hodges, et al.
JRH - yours truly, you, et al.
You - yours truly, JRH, et al.
Dally - yours truly, Om, et al.
And, yeah, even me - JRH, you, et al.

Et al., btw, is the abbreviation for the Latin phrase et alii meaning
"and others." I was going to joke and say et al. was Latin for Om, but
I got hung up by Dally so far as the kindness and respect thing goes.

Sorry, gurlfren.

And, of course, David, you're right. That choice of 'weapon' could be
applied to anyone. It'd be inaccurate - as it was when what'shisface
used it - but, hey, all's fair in love and newsgroups, right?

Yes all's fair but you have to apply one criterion to all of this . .

Who cares?

On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:36:48 +1000, "David" <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

"Curt James" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

David said:

Funny this thing about digging around other newsgroups and
using it as a 'weapon' against those you wish to get a leg up.

He was 1) incorrect and 2) lazy about his digging, though.

Yes, but you have to give him credit - he has a lot of people and a lot of
newsgoups to monitor. How thorough can he be?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Suppose someone from another group looks around MFW.
How easy would it be to go back and say about the following
people - JMW, JRH, Curt, David, Dally and a number of
others - "no one in MFW can stand you" -

Hmm. Well, they all could have that pointed at them. Except you, of
course! You're simply smashing. I've always been a fan. :o)

Sure!

Quoted message said:

Seriously

you mean you weren't??

Quoted message said:

(wait, that WAS serious), it honestly couldn't be applied to
anyone as each of those listed has their fans or, at least, people who
have treated them with respect and kindness.

JMW - Hanson, Hodges, et al.
JRH - yours truly, you, et al.
You - yours truly, JRH, et al.
Dally - yours truly, Om, et al.
And, yeah, even me - JRH, you, et al.

Et al., btw, is the abbreviation for the Latin phrase et alii meaning
"and others." I was going to joke and say et al. was Latin for Om, but
I got hung up by Dally so far as the kindness and respect thing goes.

Sorry, gurlfren.

And, of course, David, you're right. That choice of 'weapon' could be
applied to anyone. It'd be inaccurate - as it was when what'shisface
used it - but, hey, all's fair in love and newsgroups, right?

Yes all's fair but you have to apply one criterion to all of this . .

Who cares?

Well obviously John Williams cares; he's trying to get us all to take
sides.

Given that the signs are that TBR may have had his wings clipped at
last, and whatever the truth of that is it has yet to emerge, the
truth of the matter is that the TBR certainly isn't flooding the Group
at the moment.

That notwithstanding, the "trolling" hasn't stopped. It has in fact
increased to a level where the efforts of TBR were/are
inconsequential, in light of the new strenuous efforts of the master
"troll" John Williams, who has got a pissing contest underway, the
like of which we haven't seen for a long time.

Can anyone really doubt who is *really* responsible for the dissension
in the Group?

J M What-a-beak! <[email hidden]> wrote:

(But, hey, other than your nose, you're stunningly handsome.)

Quoted message said:

Curt James said:

Dally said:

I snipped the whole thing. All of it. Your pissing contest

Pissing contest? Hey, that's my phrase!

Well, kinda ... http://tinyurl.com/7kh4j

Thank you for spending a moment of your time bringing this post to
MFW's attention. I'm sure your efforts are greatly appreciated.

But you're not a troll. Nooooo. :o)

--