Unbelievable ...

Steven L. Sheffield said:

Rec.skiing.alpine has a kook even more nuts than Kunich!

Still not as bad as Roger Bratton, though ...

--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com

Went over and took a look. Man you weren't kidding, that dude is a
"little" unstable and paraoid the way a blue whale is a little large.
Bill C

Bill C said:

Went over and took a look. Man you weren't kidding, that dude is a
"little" unstable and paraoid the way a blue whale is a little large.
Bill C

They came obnoxiously a-visiting rbr when Hermann Maier was invited to
ride the prologue (2003?) and the topic was cross-posted to both rbr
and rsa

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/browse_frm/thread/3921b9f0c3662d5e/

Bill C said:

Steven L. Sheffield said:

Rec.skiing.alpine has a kook even more nuts than Kunich!

Still not as bad as Roger Bratton, though ...

--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com

Went over and took a look. Man you weren't kidding, that dude is a
"little" unstable and paraoid the way a blue whale is a little large.
Bill C

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32550,00.html

Tom Kunich wrote:
PLONK

Why is it that you seem unaware of the various spoofs that
are out there? little boy Tom Kunich is presently being investigated
by the FBI, SAN LEANDRO,CA police for his great work on the internet.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.racing/browse_thread/thread/2ad357b4ad8cf7b3/b14d71bbafa6137d?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1&hl=en#b14d71bbafa6137d

http://groups.google.com/group/aus.bicycle/browse_thread/thread/c42696248b4e1cad/3054963814f2abb8?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1&hl=en#3054963814f2abb8

37.83859833

122.10509035

Tom, I am in awe of your ability to push this guy's buttons. Steve
mentions him, nothing happens. One simple post from you and the guy goes
kerbonkers all over the newsgroup again. It's like you have a remote
control for the chip in his brain.

Carl Sundquist said:

Bill C said:

Steven L. Sheffield said:

Rec.skiing.alpine has a kook even more nuts than Kunich!

Still not as bad as Roger Bratton, though ...

--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com

Went over and took a look. Man you weren't kidding, that dude is a
"little" unstable and paraoid the way a blue whale is a little large.
Bill C

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32550,00.html

Thanks--I've seen flame wars in every ng I've ever participated, but I
wasn't aware it had ever come to a judge's order.
There are certifiable nuts in all the groups. What is interesting to
me is the mix of groups in crosspostings.
There was an antisemitic thread that went on for months a year or so
ago that was crossposted to (among others) photography, dental, and
woodworking (!) newsgroups, for no apparent reason.

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

Carl Sundquist said:

Bill C said:

Steven L. Sheffield wrote:

>Rec.skiing.alpine has a kook even more nuts than Kunich!
>
>Still not as bad as Roger Bratton, though ...
>
>
>
>--
>Steven L. Sheffield
>stevens at veloworks dot com

Went over and took a look. Man you weren't kidding, that dude is a
"little" unstable and paraoid the way a blue whale is a little large.
Bill C

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32550,00.html

Thanks--I've seen flame wars in every ng I've ever participated, but I
wasn't aware it had ever come to a judge's order.
There are certifiable nuts in all the groups. What is interesting to
me is the mix of groups in crosspostings.
There was an antisemitic thread that went on for months a year or so
ago that was crossposted to (among others) photography, dental, and
woodworking (!) newsgroups, for no apparent reason.

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Since when do the nutcases need a reason other than spreading their
message, whatever it is, to everyone out there. One of my other
favorite NGs has just about been wrecked by it. First we finally got a
break from a rightwing nutcase, and he was replaced by one from the
left, and it seems like the only thing they have in common is way too
much time to post [censored] and figure ways to beat filters so everyone sees
some of it.
That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.
Moderation sucks, but so do nutcases.
Bill C

On 12/28/2005 09:44 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Bill C"

Quoted message said:

That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.

The court order was only in effect for 1 year ... and was apparently placed
back in 1999.

During that time, he allegedly posted under another pseudonym, in violation
of the court order, but he won't admit it.

--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [foreword] slash

Steven L. Sheffield said:

On 12/28/2005 09:44 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Bill C"

Quoted message said:

That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.

The court order was only in effect for 1 year ... and was apparently placed
back in 1999.

During that time, he allegedly posted under another pseudonym, in violation
of the court order, but he won't admit it.

--
Steven L. Sheffield

I guess the only really workable wolution is to try and ignore them
since it really seems that all they want is attention, and it doesn't
matter what kind. Must be a pretty sorry life when they need the
attention of [censored] people on the internet and work so hard to get
it.
I wish they'd just donate themselves to science, where they'd actually
do society some good, and walk in front of a bus, but no such luck.
Bill C

Bill C said:

Steven L. Sheffield said:

On 12/28/2005 09:44 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Bill C"

Quoted message said:

That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.

The court order was only in effect for 1 year ... and was apparently
placed back in 1999.

During that time, he allegedly posted under another pseudonym, in
violation of the court order, but he won't admit it.

--
Steven L. Sheffield

I guess the only really workable wolution is to try and ignore them
since it really seems that all they want is attention, and it doesn't
matter what kind. Must be a pretty sorry life when they need the
attention of [censored] people on the internet and work so hard to get
it.
I wish they'd just donate themselves to science, where they'd
actually
do society some good, and walk in front of a bus, but no such luck.
Bill C

I think there is relatively little need for people to donate themselves to
science by walking in front of a bus (for one thing it just slows the bus
down and irritates all the passengers). But it could be I am out of touch
with the cutting edge research in whatever field it is that studies people
walking in front of buses.

--
Bill Asher

William Asher said:

I think there is relatively little need for people to donate themselves to
science by walking in front of a bus (for one thing it just slows the bus
down and irritates all the passengers). But it could be I am out of touch
with the cutting edge research in whatever field it is that studies people
walking in front of buses.

Well, at least it saves the scientists time, 'cause the police do all
the diagrams and chalk marks.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

William Asher said:

Bill C said:

Steven L. Sheffield said:

On 12/28/2005 09:44 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Bill C"
<[email hidden]> wrote:

> That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
> hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.

The court order was only in effect for 1 year ... and was apparently
placed back in 1999.

During that time, he allegedly posted under another pseudonym, in
violation of the court order, but he won't admit it.

--
Steven L. Sheffield

I guess the only really workable wolution is to try and ignore them
since it really seems that all they want is attention, and it doesn't
matter what kind. Must be a pretty sorry life when they need the
attention of [censored] people on the internet and work so hard to get
it.
I wish they'd just donate themselves to science, where they'd
actually
do society some good, and walk in front of a bus, but no such luck.
Bill C

I think there is relatively little need for people to donate themselves to
science by walking in front of a bus (for one thing it just slows the bus
down and irritates all the passengers). But it could be I am out of touch
with the cutting edge research in whatever field it is that studies people
walking in front of buses.

--
Bill Asher

I suppose instead of the bus bit they could volunteer to be live crash
test dummies. That might make more sense as it wouldn't inconvenience
anyone. Wonder if they might be planning to bring back the Pinto? I'd
love to see that tested with live dummies.
Bill C

Bill C wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

I suppose instead of the bus bit they could volunteer to be live

crash

Quoted message said:

test dummies. That might make more sense as it wouldn't inconvenience
anyone. Wonder if they might be planning to bring back the Pinto? I'd
love to see that tested with live dummies.

Rollover tests using fully loaded Excursions might give you more bang per
buck, so to speak.

They were going to make a hybrid Pinto and call it a Mule.

--
Bill Asher

Curtis L. Russell said:

William Asher said:

I think there is relatively little need for people to donate
themselves to science by walking in front of a bus (for one thing it
just slows the bus down and irritates all the passengers). But it
could be I am out of touch with the cutting edge research in whatever
field it is that studies people walking in front of buses.

Well, at least it saves the scientists time, 'cause the police do all
the diagrams and chalk marks.

Yeah. The scientists would draw the collision as a Feynman diagram, time-
reverse it, and the guy would still be walking around.

--
Bill Asher

Bill C said:

William Asher said:

Bill C said:

Steven L. Sheffield wrote:
> On 12/28/2005 09:44 AM, in article
> [email hidden], "Bill C"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> > That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
> > hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.
>
>
> The court order was only in effect for 1 year ... and was apparently
> placed back in 1999.
>
> During that time, he allegedly posted under another pseudonym, in
> violation of the court order, but he won't admit it.
>
>
>
> --
> Steven L. Sheffield
I guess the only really workable wolution is to try and ignore them
since it really seems that all they want is attention, and it doesn't
matter what kind. Must be a pretty sorry life when they need the
attention of [censored] people on the internet and work so hard to get
it.
I wish they'd just donate themselves to science, where they'd
actually
do society some good, and walk in front of a bus, but no such luck.
Bill C

I think there is relatively little need for people to donate themselves to
science by walking in front of a bus (for one thing it just slows the bus
down and irritates all the passengers). But it could be I am out of touch
with the cutting edge research in whatever field it is that studies people
walking in front of buses.

--
Bill Asher

I suppose instead of the bus bit they could volunteer to be live crash
test dummies. That might make more sense as it wouldn't inconvenience
anyone. Wonder if they might be planning to bring back the Pinto? I'd
love to see that tested with live dummies.

Hey, let's get this back on topic AND make the best use of them: HELMET TESTING!

That's right, no more anecdotal [censored] or uncontrolled statistics, we can use 'em
for real experiments.

Ron

In article
<[email hidden]>,

Bill C said:

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

Carl Sundquist said:

Bill C wrote:

>Steven L. Sheffield wrote:
>
>>Rec.skiing.alpine has a kook even more nuts than Kunich!
>>
>>Still not as bad as Roger Bratton, though ...
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Steven L. Sheffield
>>stevens at veloworks dot com
>
> Went over and took a look. Man you weren't kidding, that dude is a
>"little" unstable and paraoid the way a blue whale is a little large.
> Bill C

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32550,00.html

Thanks--I've seen flame wars in every ng I've ever participated, but I
wasn't aware it had ever come to a judge's order.
There are certifiable nuts in all the groups. What is interesting to
me is the mix of groups in crosspostings.
There was an antisemitic thread that went on for months a year or so
ago that was crossposted to (among others) photography, dental, and
woodworking (!) newsgroups, for no apparent reason.

Since when do the nutcases need a reason other than spreading their
message, whatever it is, to everyone out there. One of my other
favorite NGs has just about been wrecked by it. First we finally got a
break from a rightwing nutcase, and he was replaced by one from the
left, and it seems like the only thing they have in common is way too
much time to post [censored] and figure ways to beat filters so everyone sees
some of it.
That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.
Moderation sucks, but so do nutcases.

The `sane' people continue to take the bait. What would it
take to clean up usenet, hmmm? Then, again, for many the
whole point is mud wrestling. Chaqu'un á son gout.

--
Michael Press

"Tim Lines" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tom, I am in awe of your ability to push this guy's buttons. Steve
mentions him, nothing happens. One simple post from you and the guy goes
kerbonkers all over the newsgroup again. It's like you have a remote
control for the chip in his brain.

Well, you know what it's like. Supposedly the cops talked to him and he
knows that there were about a dozen of us that filed charges against him.
They don't want to press it unless they absolutely have to and after talking
to a judge here I decided that it was hardly worth my while to put him away.
Those involved pretty much decided that we'd simply wait for him to go too
far. He's been trying to find ways to spoof the internet but now every
posting is recorded with it's routing information on many servers. Sooner or
later his trying to spoof other people's accounts will bear a fruit that he
doesn't intend.

Now that I've watched him for awhile I find him more pitiful than anything
else. Imagine - he has nothing better to do than to wage an endless war on
the internet against people who, unlike him, have a life. When you think
about it, it's sort of like watching an insane person slowly disintegrating
before your very eyes.

I figure that we'll see him in the newspapers locally when he performs a
particularly nasty suicide.

In article <[email hidden]>, Steven L. Sheffield

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

That guy over on rec.skiing is just blowing off the court order so
hopefully the it gets back to the judge for contempt at least.

The court order was only in effect for 1 year ... and was apparently placed
back in 1999.

.... and the feud is still going on! Cyberspace's version of the
Hatfield and McCoys!

Luke

Quoted message said:

Curtis L. Russell said:

Well, at least it saves the scientists time, 'cause the police do all
the diagrams and chalk marks.

William Asher said:

Yeah. The scientists would draw the collision as a Feynman diagram, time-
reverse it, and the guy would still be walking around.

Dumbass,
That only works for cats.