UK and Europe · Public discussion

Empirical evidence

Started by Mike Causer · · Last activity · 5 posts · 378 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
23 December 2005
Last activity
24 December 2005
Original author
Mike Causer
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
378
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. TrollB said:

    Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone
    who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.

    This is his entire message [1]: nothing added, nothing taken away. TrollB
    must find a very small number of peop^W other trolls to speak to under the
    GLA's bridge!

    [1] <[email hidden]>

    Mike

  2. Mike Causer said:
    TrollB said:

    Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone
    who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.

    This is his entire message [1]: nothing added, nothing taken away. TrollB
    must find a very small number of peop^W other trolls to speak to under the
    GLA's bridge!

    I know of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist - I read
    about it on Usenet. It would not surprise me if this was true of large
    numbers of people I speak to (not all of them read Usenet, but possibly
    some of read the newspaper articles that some of the Usenet posts were
    quoting).

  3. Mike Causer said:
    TrollB said:

    Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone
    who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.

    This is his entire message [1]: nothing added, nothing taken away.

    Yes, interesting that you picked it out and started a sub-thread with
    it. What was wrong with the original?

    AAMOI do you agree with me?

    --
    Matt B

  4. Alan Braggins said:

    (not all of them read Usenet, but possibly
    some of read the newspaper articles that some of the Usenet posts were
    quoting).

    Some may even read newspapers that quote the original usenet posts....
    and so on, yea verily unto the source of the initial story. Easy innit??

    bfn,

    Tony B

  5. Alan Braggins said:
    Quoted message said:
    TrollB said:

    Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone
    who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.

    I know of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist - I read
    about it on Usenet. It would not surprise me if this was true of large
    numbers of people I speak to (not all of them read Usenet, but possibly
    some of read the newspaper articles that some of the Usenet posts were
    quoting).

    I have been hit by a cyclist on the pavement - I exited my drive-way
    and he piled into the side of me. No injuries to anyone.

    I have been hit by cars in the road more often than I have been hit by
    cyclists on the pavement, however, (and they have caused me more
    injury) so this obviously proves we must have a zero tolerance policy
    and ensure that no cars are allowed on the road, ever.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.