Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.
This is his entire message [1]: nothing added, nothing taken away. TrollB must find a very small number of peop^W other trolls to speak to under the GLA's bridge!
Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.
This is his entire message [1]: nothing added, nothing taken away. TrollB must find a very small number of peop^W other trolls to speak to under the GLA's bridge!
I know of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist - I read about it on Usenet. It would not surprise me if this was true of large numbers of people I speak to (not all of them read Usenet, but possibly some of read the newspaper articles that some of the Usenet posts were quoting).
Empirical. Almost everyone I speak to has been hit, or knows of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist.
I know of someone who has been hit on the pavement by a cyclist - I read about it on Usenet. It would not surprise me if this was true of large numbers of people I speak to (not all of them read Usenet, but possibly some of read the newspaper articles that some of the Usenet posts were quoting).
I have been hit by a cyclist on the pavement - I exited my drive-way and he piled into the side of me. No injuries to anyone.
I have been hit by cars in the road more often than I have been hit by cyclists on the pavement, however, (and they have caused me more injury) so this obviously proves we must have a zero tolerance policy and ensure that no cars are allowed on the road, ever.