Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

why risers?

Started by Deluxe Model · · Last activity · 40 posts · 1,829 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
24 August 2003
Last activity
27 August 2003
Original author
Deluxe Model
Posts
40
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,829
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 40
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Chris Phillipo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Try a Titec Hell-bent 27" flat bar.


    That'll be the perfect opportunity to try one of these:

    performancebike.comProfile.cfm

    That's a neat little creak amplifier they have there.


    It would certainly kill the 'cool' factor.

  2. "Paladin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Steve" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What is the point of risers? I've got them on my ride, but it seems that it puts me in a more
    upright position, making my control less agressive. Why do I see the easton monkeylite (riser)
    on most racer's bikes?

    Steve

    It's a matter of preference, fit, and application. For me, the wider grip provides better
    handling, breathing and control. The sweep back is better for my hands and arms. The rise fits me
    and my bike.

    Here's a report I posted after putting a riser bar on my geared bike 3 yrs ago:


    My feelings exactly. I went to slightly shorter stem, and it decreased the sensitivity of the front
    wheel to a more comfortable level.

  3. Chris Phillipo said:

    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't see why you couldn't take the same two frames and outfit one with risers and one with
    flat and get the exact same position on both. It's just a combination of stem, rake, and
    handlebars. I think risers are in style and flat aren't.

    You can only if you can find a flat bar with 3-5 degrees of sweep, like a titec Flattracker, and
    you don't mind having a 45 degree stem and always worrying about when it's going to break because
    it flexes so much.

    You can get flat bars with up 5, 9, 11 or even 15 degree bend, in widths up to 660mm (26" for those
    of you who prefer that). So you really can replicate most riser bar positions with the right stem.

    And I'm not sure why a stem with rise would flex any more than any other stem, or be more likely to
    break. In fact, I suspect the load may be distributed at the critical extension to clamp area better
    on a stem with lotsa rise...

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

  4. deluxe model said:

    My feelings exactly. I went to slightly shorter stem, and it decreased the sensitivity of the
    front wheel to a more comfortable level.

    Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  5. Chris Phillipo <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Try a Titec Hell-bent 27" flat bar.


    That'll be the perfect opportunity to try one of these:

    performancebike.comProfile.cfm

    That's a neat little creak amplifier they have there.

    Not in the least - used the exact same one (but in silver) on a previous bike (needed to be much
    more upright - lower back issues) and it didn't cause or amplify any creaking, was rigid has a very
    rigid thing etc. Bottom line is, it does what it says it does and well.

    Shaun aRe

  6. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:

    My feelings exactly. I went to slightly shorter stem, and it decreased


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    sensitivity of the front wheel to a more comfortable level.

    Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.


    Um, ever heard of weight bias?

  7. "deluxe model" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:

    My feelings exactly. I went to slightly shorter stem, and it decreased


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    sensitivity of the front wheel to a more comfortable level.

    Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.


    Um, ever heard of weight bias?


    I should have mentioned I went with an offset seatpost as well. I needed/wanted more weight
    to the rear.

  8. deluxe model said:
    Quoted message said:

    Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.

    Um, ever heard of weight bias?

    Yes, but I hardly think your bike will turn you away because you're fat.

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  9. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:
    Quoted message said:

    Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.

    Um, ever heard of weight bias?

    Yes, but I hardly think your bike will turn you away because you're fat.


    Heh, I'm not exactly fat. Tall, yes.

  10. deluxe model said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.
    >

    Um, ever heard of weight bias?

    Yes, but I hardly think your bike will turn you away because you're fat.

    Heh, I'm not exactly fat. Tall, yes.

    It was a joke. Go on, explain weight bias and its relevant influence to the sensitivity of steering.

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  11. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.
    >>
    >
    >Um, ever heard of weight bias?

    Yes, but I hardly think your bike will turn you away because you're fat.

    Heh, I'm not exactly fat. Tall, yes.

    It was a joke. Go on, explain weight bias and its relevant influence to the sensitivity of
    steering.


    Not until I've had my coffee.

  12. "deluxe model" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:

    >>>Um, shorter stems increase the sensitivity of steering.
    >>>
    >>
    >>Um, ever heard of weight bias?
    >
    >Yes, but I hardly think your bike will turn you away because you're


    fat.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >

    Heh, I'm not exactly fat. Tall, yes.

    It was a joke. Go on, explain weight bias and its relevant influence to the sensitivity of
    steering.


    Not until I've had my coffee.


    Ok, I've had my coffee.

    Heavier wheel equals more traction. I felt as if I was hanging out over the front wheel a little too
    much. I went from a 130mm stem, to a 120mm. I added a 1.5 riser, a Race Face offset seatpost, and
    shifted my weight more towards the rear. It made all the difference, and loved it.

    The bike was a 19.5 Voodoo. It was a little on the small size, but I did not want to go with the 21"
    frame. I was between sizes, and felt the smaller frame would be a better choice. I now second guess
    that decision to go with the smaller frame.

  13. "deluxe model" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ok, I've had my coffee.

    Heavier wheel equals more traction. I felt as if I was hanging out over


    the

    Quoted message said:

    front wheel a little too much. I went from a 130mm stem, to a 120mm. I


    added

    Quoted message said:

    a 1.5 riser, a Race Face offset seatpost, and shifted my weight more


    towards

    Quoted message said:

    the rear. It made all the difference, and loved it.

    Is that what you meant when you wrote it "decreased the _sensitivity_ of the front wheel" (emphasis
    added)? I think that is what Bomba was questioning*, as a shorter stem makes steering quicker.

    Bill "*quite rightly" S.

  14. deluxe model said:

    Heavier wheel equals more traction. I felt as if I was hanging out over the front wheel a little
    too much. I went from a 130mm stem, to a 120mm. I added a 1.5 riser, a Race Face offset seatpost,
    and shifted my weight more towards the rear. It made all the difference, and loved it.

    Ok, so you made a host of changes and have attributed the change in steering characteristics to a
    10mm change in stem length... <shakes head

  15. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:

    Heavier wheel equals more traction. I felt as if I was hanging out over


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    front wheel a little too much. I went from a 130mm stem, to a 120mm. I


    added

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a 1.5 riser, a Race Face offset seatpost, and shifted my weight more


    towards

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the rear. It made all the difference, and loved it.

    Ok, so you made a host of changes and have attributed the change in steering characteristics to a
    10mm change in stem length... <shakes head>

    That's the whole point. I don't think he *EVER* was talking about steering; really meant shifting
    weight back.

    Bill "that's why 'front wheel sensitivity' made no sense" S.

  16. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:

    Heavier wheel equals more traction. I felt as if I was hanging out over


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    front wheel a little too much. I went from a 130mm stem, to a 120mm. I


    added

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a 1.5 riser, a Race Face offset seatpost, and shifted my weight more


    towards

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the rear. It made all the difference, and loved it.

    Ok, so you made a host of changes and have attributed the change in steering characteristics to a
    10mm change in stem length... <shakes head>


    No, as it was the placement of my ass over the rear wheel more than anything. Change in the stem
    length just coincided with the rearward shift in the seating position. I have a tendancy to leave
    out some detail. I will try to do better in the future with this.

  17. deluxe model said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ok, so you made a host of changes and have attributed the change in steering characteristics to a
    10mm change in stem length... <shakes head>


    No, as it was the placement of my ass over the rear wheel more than anything. Change in the stem
    length just coincided with the rearward shift in the seating position.

    This is what you wrote: "I went to slightly shorter stem, and it decreased the sensitivity of the
    front wheel"

    See why we might have been confused?

    Quoted message said:

    I have a tendancy to leave out some detail.

    No [censored]!

  18. "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    deluxe model said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ok, so you made a host of changes and have attributed the change in steering characteristics to
    a 10mm change in stem length... <shakes


    head>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    No, as it was the placement of my ass over the rear wheel more than anything. Change in the stem
    length just coincided with the rearward


    shift

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in the seating position.

    This is what you wrote: "I went to slightly shorter stem, and it decreased the sensitivity of the
    front wheel"

    See why we might have been confused?


    Yes.

    Longer bar will decrease sensitivity.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have a tendancy to leave out some detail.

    No [censored]!


    Long story short....

    Bent OEM Titec offset seatpost.

    Replaced with Thomson 'non-offset' seatpost.

    Had handling problem.

    Replaced OEM 22" Titec flat bar & 130 x 10° stem with 120 x 10° Kore stem & generic 1.5 26" riser.

    Handling problem did not go completely away....liked the feel of riser & more upright position.

    Pondered the situation.

    Light bulb comes on!

    Buy Race Face offset XY seatpost.

    Problem solved & and liked the way the bike felt better than before.

    Sold Thomson seatpost.

  19. "deluxe model" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    deluxe model wrote:


    <snip debate>

    I'm tall and found that the stem that came with my bike was too long, therefore I had a hard time
    getting my weight back over my rear wheel.

    So I bought a shorter stem and it facilitated the problem. Is this basically what you did?

    So I guess if you get an offset seatpost which I never thought of, it along with stem length adds
    another variable in getting a preferred riding position when it comes to weight distribution and
    cockpit dimensions...

    SDC

  20. "SDC" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "deluxe model" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "bomba" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    deluxe model wrote:


    <snip debate>

    I'm tall and found that the stem that came with my bike was too long, therefore I had a hard time
    getting my weight back over my rear wheel.

    So I bought a shorter stem and it facilitated the problem. Is this basically what you did?

    So I guess if you get an offset seatpost which I never thought of, it


    along

    Quoted message said:

    with stem length adds another variable in getting a preferred riding position when it comes to
    weight distribution and cockpit dimensions...


    Yep! Hopefully this new frame will solve everything.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.