"Edward Holt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:I'm about to change my rapid fire Shimano selectors to SRAM Rockets which are Shimano compatible.
Personally, I prefer Grip Shift changing rather than the Shimano option.
As it's quite a big change I'm interested in other's opinions on the SRAM
vs. Shimano component debate.
Is there any distinct benefit in either camp?
I have always had a problem with Shimano shifters for two reasons:
1.) I accidentally actuate them all the damn time, because I move my hands on the grips a lot while
riding. With GripShift (Rockets) which have a short twist portion, I can get my hands completely
off the twisty part and still have full brake control. Control is good.
2.) With Shimano triggers or any indexed Shimano shifter, I cannot change a lot of rear at one shot.
I find myself switching down three or four cogs at a time, and that takes time - sometimes time I
don't have - with Shimano indexed shifters.
Now those are the major reasons. A minor reason is that a few of the Shimano shifters that I have
had are also integrated with the brakes. So, if you crash and bust off the brake lever, you get to
buy a whole new group, and change out TWO cable sets, AND do another derailleur adjustment. OK,
maybe not change out the cables, but you still have to take the whole damn thing apart to thread the
inner wire through the new shifter/brake, so you may as well change the cable. Not a huge deal, but
annoying. And there's the expense of it...
OK, it's a ramble, and a few days of reading for some of the more "challenged" in a.m-b., but
you get the general picture. Some folks just hate GripShift. They work for me, and I'm not
going to change
rode in on. But he does have one thing right - Anything to make a bike Shimano-free is a good thing.
Next upgrade I'm gonna ditch the Shimano and go Raceface/SRAM/CK.
Spider