Group: rec.bicycles.misc Date: Tue, Nov 29, 2005, 2:18am (EST+5) From:
[email hidden] (Ryan Cousineau)
<edited for length>
Quoted message said:Chris, don't take this the wrong way, but
every one of those backgrounds is a
visual atrocity.
Quoted message said:There's rarely a good reason to move >away from a simple background
colour
Quoted message said:like white, beige, or (if you must) black.
There's a reason why the pages most
beloved of nerds and UI types don't have
dark-coloured folded-cloth backgrounds
on them.
Quoted message said:Think clean design.
Quoted message said:--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden]
Not taken wrong. I did ask for input, and last time I checked,
consrtuctive critisism counts as such. So I took your suggestion to
heart and went to the page I had built so far.
First, I removed the image BG and replaced it with a few solid colors,
"testing the waters". But thay all looked flat somehow (sorry 'bout the
pun).
So, I tried putting just the page heading in a table with the satin BG,
thinking it might add some of the lost "bling". Better, but the rest of
the page was stiil dull, and it made the hole thing worse Therefore, I
came to a comprimise.
Most PC modems have the option of whether or not they display image
backgrounds. so, I put both solid bgcolor AND an image background
attributes in the body tag. Perfectly legal HTML protocol, and you have
a choice of how you want to view the pages.
- -
Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"
"May you have the winds at your back,
And a really low gear for the hills!"
Chris'Z Corner
http://www.geocities.com/czcorner