Road Cycling · Public discussion

Carbon Frame selection

Started by Cat Dailey · · Last activity · 42 posts · 1,045 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
19 November 2005
Last activity
14 January 2006
Original author
Cat Dailey
Posts
42
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,045
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 42
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. (cross-posted to .misc)
    Hey all .... q for the learned masses:

    After having probably my best season yet (10,700 miles and counting until
    Tues), I find myself in the crappiest position of having to have knee
    surgery and 4-6 weeks off (so much for my great base ;<😉 right as I was
    contemplating racing or the first time in probably 15 years and Master's
    Nats next season (in PA!-yes, I am a Master's Fattie wannabe ;>😉

    I was planning on buying a new frame this season and am looking for a
    monocoque constructed carbon. My dream bike is the Giant TCR Advanced with
    the extended seattube, but it will not be imported to the US this year, and
    will likely be unavailable as a frame only in Europe due to high demand.
    I saw that BH makes a very similar (probably same factory in Taiwan) frame,
    but they aren't sold in the US and they don't respond to email requests for
    some reason (maybe non-English speaking?)

    Since I am left with non-extended seat tube bikes, and am a little peeved at
    Giant, can you guys help me out with some brands that I should look at? I
    have absolutely no interest in Trek, and I don't care for the webbed lugs of
    the Calfee. I do want a really light frame (for 130 lb female, 54stx55tt)
    and prefer non-compact, but I think I am stuck with compact. I checked out
    Cervelo, and am interested in the R3, but there's no information about it
    yet on their website. What else should I be considering?

    This could be a fun and motivating project during my recovery. Thanks in
    advance for helping me out!

    Cat

  2. Dans le message de news:[email hidden],
    Cat Dailey <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

    Quoted message said:

    (cross-posted to .misc)
    Hey all .... q for the learned masses:

    After having probably my best season yet (10,700 miles and counting
    until Tues), I find myself in the crappiest position of having to
    have knee surgery and 4-6 weeks off (so much for my great base ;<😉
    right as I was contemplating racing or the first time in probably 15
    years and Master's Nats next season (in PA!-yes, I am a Master's
    Fattie wannabe ;>😉
    I was planning on buying a new frame this season and am looking for a
    monocoque constructed carbon. My dream bike is the Giant TCR
    Advanced with the extended seattube, but it will not be imported to
    the US this year, and will likely be unavailable as a frame only in
    Europe due to high demand. I saw that BH makes a very similar (probably
    same factory in Taiwan)
    frame, but they aren't sold in the US and they don't respond to email
    requests for some reason (maybe non-English speaking?)

    Since I am left with non-extended seat tube bikes, and am a little
    peeved at Giant, can you guys help me out with some brands that I
    should look at? I have absolutely no interest in Trek, and I don't
    care for the webbed lugs of the Calfee. I do want a really light
    frame (for 130 lb female, 54stx55tt) and prefer non-compact, but I
    think I am stuck with compact. I checked out Cervelo, and am
    interested in the R3, but there's no information about it yet on
    their website. What else should I be considering?
    This could be a fun and motivating project during my recovery. Thanks in
    advance for helping me out!

    Cat

    Bettini and Boonen think TIME is not too bad a frame. And it has the
    cut-once VERY CAREFULLY weird extended seat tube you crave.

    http://www.timesport.fr/fr/accueil.htm

    --
    Bonne route !

    Sandy
    Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

  3. "Sandy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Dans le message de news:[email hidden],
    Cat Dailey <[email hidden]> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :

    Quoted message said:

    (cross-posted to .misc)
    Hey all .... q for the learned masses:

    After having probably my best season yet (10,700 miles and counting
    until Tues), I find myself in the crappiest position of having to
    have knee surgery and 4-6 weeks off (so much for my great base ;<😉
    right as I was contemplating racing or the first time in probably 15
    years and Master's Nats next season (in PA!-yes, I am a Master's
    Fattie wannabe ;>😉
    I was planning on buying a new frame this season and am looking for a
    monocoque constructed carbon. My dream bike is the Giant TCR
    Advanced with the extended seattube, but it will not be imported to
    the US this year, and will likely be unavailable as a frame only in
    Europe due to high demand. I saw that BH makes a very similar (probably
    same factory in Taiwan)
    frame, but they aren't sold in the US and they don't respond to email
    requests for some reason (maybe non-English speaking?)

    Since I am left with non-extended seat tube bikes, and am a little
    peeved at Giant, can you guys help me out with some brands that I
    should look at? I have absolutely no interest in Trek, and I don't
    care for the webbed lugs of the Calfee. I do want a really light
    frame (for 130 lb female, 54stx55tt) and prefer non-compact, but I
    think I am stuck with compact. I checked out Cervelo, and am
    interested in the R3, but there's no information about it yet on
    their website. What else should I be considering?
    This could be a fun and motivating project during my recovery. Thanks in
    advance for helping me out!

    Cat

    Bettini and Boonen think TIME is not too bad a frame. And it has the
    cut-once VERY CAREFULLY weird extended seat tube you crave.

    http://www.timesport.fr/fr/accueil.htm

    --
    Bonne route !

    Sandy
    Verneuil-sur-Seine FR


    Thanks Sandy! I had forgotten about Time, probably because they seem on the
    heavy side for what I am looking for, but definitely worth a second look.
    And one man's weirdness is another man's lust, or something like that ;>
    For me, it's all about aesthetics. I have no other excuse. I've ridden Ti,
    aluminum, carbon, carbon/aluminum, and other than weight, it's really all
    about how it looks to me.

    Cat

  4. "Cat Dailey" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Ask in rec.bicycles.tech for all your cycling needs.

  5. "Jim Flom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:RsHff.118476$y_1.21971@edtnps89...

    Quoted message said:

    "Cat Dailey" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Ask in rec.bicycles.tech for all your cycling needs.


    I wasn't sure, but it didn't really seem to be a technical question to me :>

    Cat

  6. Cat Dailey said:

    can you guys help me out with some brands that I should look at?

    Best very light frame is the Scott CR1. (<- that's a period).
    Don't get the elliptical chainrings, though.

    --
    E. Dronkert

  7. "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Cat Dailey said:

    can you guys help me out with some brands that I should look at?

    Best very light frame is the Scott CR1. (<- that's a period).
    Don't get the elliptical chainrings, though.

    --
    E. Dronkert

    Another great suggestion! See, I knew you guys could help ;> So far:

    Time, Orbea, Scott

    Cat

  8. Cat Dailey said:

    (cross-posted to .misc)

    No it wasn't, your post was only posted this newsgroup. Maybe you posted
    it there as well, but that's multi-posting and undesirable.

    By the by, some heavy cross-posting going on in alt.b.m.s, at the moment.

    --
    E. Dronkert

  9. Quoted message said:

    I don't care for the webbed lugs of the Calfee.

    Are you buying it to ride or to hang on your wall? With Calfee you also
    have a chance that if you munch the frame they can fix it. If you have
    an issue with a Euro frame you might get some help but good luck. I'm
    biased since I ride a Calfee and just bought one for the wife, but one
    really should choose a frame based on performance.

    Choice in Carbon depends on what type of ride you want. Frames like the
    Calfee and Look tend to feel more like a good steel bike than monocoque
    frames. Depends what you like and I highly suggest real test rides
    prior to shelling out the cash since the bikes you are looking at are
    not cheap.

    If I were looking at Carbon frames today it would come down to the
    Calfee, Look or Scott frames. My dad is currently on the top end Giant,
    and dollar per dollar that bike is a huge value.

    You might do well to look at other materials as well. Carbon is great
    for some applications and riders but if you'll be doing short races you
    might want to go with steel or TI as those frames may feel more
    "lively" to you. In TI I would personally go with Moots. In steel,
    Richie is the master but I am enamored of the new Independent Fab
    bikes.

    Good luck with the surgery and very impressive mileage. I did 6K this
    year and thought that was pretty good. 10K is way out there.

    Mark

  10. Kestrel Evoke or Talon SL are pretty sweet. The internal cables on the
    Talon make maintenance more difficult, and they slap on the tubes
    creating noise (I've practically eliminated that on mine with a little
    work), but they look good, and the bike can double as a TT bike in a pinch.

    Wayne

  11. Jim Flom said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ask in rec.bicycles.tech for all your cycling needs.

    Cat Dailey wrote:>

    Quoted message said:

    I wasn't sure, but it didn't really seem to be a technical question to me :>

    Yes but they will give you a 500 post thread on whats the optimal way
    to patch a tube.

  12. "Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't care for the webbed lugs of the Calfee.

    Are you buying it to ride or to hang on your wall? With Calfee you also
    have a chance that if you munch the frame they can fix it. If you have
    an issue with a Euro frame you might get some help but good luck. I'm
    biased since I ride a Calfee and just bought one for the wife, but one
    really should choose a frame based on performance.

    Choice in Carbon depends on what type of ride you want. Frames like the
    Calfee and Look tend to feel more like a good steel bike than monocoque
    frames. Depends what you like and I highly suggest real test rides
    prior to shelling out the cash since the bikes you are looking at are
    not cheap.

    If I were looking at Carbon frames today it would come down to the
    Calfee, Look or Scott frames. My dad is currently on the top end Giant,
    and dollar per dollar that bike is a huge value.

    You might do well to look at other materials as well. Carbon is great
    for some applications and riders but if you'll be doing short races you
    might want to go with steel or TI as those frames may feel more
    "lively" to you. In TI I would personally go with Moots. In steel,
    Richie is the master but I am enamored of the new Independent Fab
    bikes.

    Good luck with the surgery and very impressive mileage. I did 6K this
    year and thought that was pretty good. 10K is way out there.

    Mark

    Parlee.
    Hey - thanks for reading.
    e-RICHIE©T®

  13. Jim Flom said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ask in rec.bicycles.tech for all your cycling needs.

    Cat Dailey wrote:>

    Quoted message said:

    I wasn't sure, but it didn't really seem to be a technical question to me :>

    Yes but they will give you a 500 post thread on whats the optimal way
    to patch a tube.

  14. "Donald Munro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jim Flom said:
    Quoted message said:

    Ask in rec.bicycles.tech for all your cycling needs.

    Cat Dailey wrote:>

    Quoted message said:

    I wasn't sure, but it didn't really seem to be a technical question to me
    :>

    Yes but they will give you a 500 post thread on whats the optimal way
    to patch a tube.

    The horror <grin>. Does anyone really still patch those things? And admit
    it by posting about it?

    Cat the consumer of tubes

  15. Cat Dailey said:

    One party who replied even asked me if I was going
    to "ride it or hang it on the wall." I guess the part about me riding over
    10,000 miles this year (and it is still November) was missed by at least one
    reader.

    he didn't miss it. later in his post he wrote to you:

    "Good luck with the surgery and very impressive mileage. I did 6K this
    year and thought that was pretty good. 10K is way out there."

    i think he was trying to make another point with his question about
    riding it or hanging it on the wall, not trying to flame you.

    heather

  16. "h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Cat Dailey said:

    One party who replied even asked me if I was going to "ride it or hang
    it on the wall." I guess the part about me riding over 10,000 miles this
    year (and it is still November) was missed by at least one reader.

    he didn't miss it. later in his post he wrote to you:

    "Good luck with the surgery and very impressive mileage. I did 6K this
    year and thought that was pretty good. 10K is way out there."

    i think he was trying to make another point with his question about riding
    it or hanging it on the wall, not trying to flame you.

    heather

    Thanks H, I saw that, but I was frankly a little confused by his post. I
    hate it when I am very specific about something (i.e.: help me out with some
    carbon frame manufacturers so I can amuse myself while recovering from
    surgery) and someone goes off on maybe you should consider other materials,
    what do you want to do with it, etc etc. I didn't think it was a flame,
    either, just didn't know what it was. But, in any event, good riding to you
    and keep your fingers crossed for me on Tues, or chant, or say a prayer, or
    something, if you feel you'd like to send out some happy thoughts to a
    hurtin' cyclist pal ;>

    Cat

  17. Cat Dailey said:

    "Ewoud Dronkert" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Cat Dailey said:

    can you guys help me out with some brands that I should look at?

    Best very light frame is the Scott CR1. (<- that's a period).
    Don't get the elliptical chainrings, though.

    --
    E. Dronkert

    Another great suggestion! See, I knew you guys could help ;> So far:

    Time, Orbea, Scott

    Cat


    Bianchi.

  18. Cat Dailey said:

    if you feel you'd like to send out some happy thoughts to a
    hurtin' cyclist pal ;>

    well, of course, even though i still think of you as a skater 🙂 there's
    a reason that i'm riding a stupid trainer instead of outside running 10
    or 20 miles (dumbass knee of my own). i'm also terrified of surgery (not
    that you should be, i'm just neurotic), so i can't help but sympathize
    and hope it goes as well as it can for you.

    heather

  19. Look

    http://www.bikyle.com/Look2005.asp

  20. "Cat Dailey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Thanks Sandy! I had forgotten about Time, probably because they seem on
    the heavy side for what I am looking for, but definitely worth a second
    look. And one man's weirdness is another man's lust, or something like
    that ;> For me, it's all about aesthetics. I have no other excuse. I've
    ridden Ti, aluminum, carbon, carbon/aluminum, and other than weight, it's
    really all about how it looks to me.

    Most of the people I've talked to about Time frames rave about them. I can
    tell you that I bought a Look KG241 for a beater bike and I'm really
    surprised at how good it handles. It's absolutely smooth riding and on
    downhills I'll be thinking I'm riding at 25 or so and when I look at the
    speedo it's showing 35.

    I don't know if the latest Look frames ride that well but I suspect they do.
    Of course I ride a 60 cm c-c frame and the shorter version you ride might
    handle completely different. That's something to think about - unless
    someone is about your size and weight their opinions might not jibe with
    yours.

    Tom

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.