General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Study Needed

Started by Glassman · · Last activity · 11 posts · 329 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 November 2005
Last activity
2 November 2005
Original author
Glassman
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
329
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off, you'll
    lose weight theory." I need to prove that you can eat alot more protein
    calories and still lose more weight than a low cal high carb diet. But I
    lost the link to the study for this.... thanks!

  2. "How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off,
    you'll
    lose weight theory."

    Sorry, but this isn't a theory, it's a fact. If you're burning more
    energy than contained in the food you're eating, where do you think the
    additonal energy is coming from?

    This is very different than the argument that the body may not process
    the calories of different types of food with different efficiencies.
    For example, if you're burning 2500 calories a day and eat two
    different diets containing 2700 calories, I think it's definitely
    possible to maintain weight on one, while gaining it on another diet
    with the same 2700 calories. But if both diets have 2300 calories,
    it's impossible not to lose weight while burning 2500 calories, because
    the maximum amount of energy available is less than that be burned.

  3. "How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off,
    you'll
    lose weight theory."

    Sorry, but this isn't a theory, it's a fact. If you're burning more
    energy than contained in the food you're eating, where do you think the
    additonal energy is coming from?

    This is very different than the argument that the body may not process
    the calories of different types of food with different efficiencies.
    For example, if you're burning 2500 calories a day and eat two
    different diets containing 2700 calories, I think it's definitely
    possible to maintain weight on one, while gaining it on another diet
    with the same 2700 calories. But if both diets have 2300 calories,
    it's impossible not to lose weight while burning 2500 calories, because
    the maximum amount of energy available is less than that be burned.

  4. "How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off,
    you'll
    lose weight theory."

    Sorry, but this isn't a theory, it's a fact. If you're burning more
    energy than contained in the food you're eating, where do you think the
    additonal energy is coming from?

    This is very different than the argument that the body may not process
    the calories of different types of food with different efficiencies.
    For example, if you're burning 2500 calories a day and eat two
    different diets containing 2700 calories, I think it's definitely
    possible to maintain weight on one, while gaining it on another diet
    with the same 2700 calories. But if both diets have 2300 calories,
    it's impossible not to lose weight while burning 2500 calories, because
    the maximum amount of energy available is less than that be burned.

  5. Glassman said:


    How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off, you'll
    lose weight theory."

    You need to phrase that one differently. Phrased as-is
    you won't be able to disprove it because it's true.
    The key is the number of calories burned is more
    variable than most tend to think. You're looking for
    studies that show two different diets with the same
    total calories, and one triggers better loss than the
    other. Lots of those studies are still referenced in
    the support section of the Atkins web site.

    Quoted message said:

    I need to prove that you can eat alot more protein
    calories and still lose more weight than a low cal high carb diet. But I
    lost the link to the study for this.... thanks!

  6. Glassman said:


    How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off, you'll
    lose weight theory."

    You need to phrase that one differently. Phrased as-is
    you won't be able to disprove it because it's true.
    The key is the number of calories burned is more
    variable than most tend to think. You're looking for
    studies that show two different diets with the same
    total calories, and one triggers better loss than the
    other. Lots of those studies are still referenced in
    the support section of the Atkins web site.

    Quoted message said:

    I need to prove that you can eat alot more protein
    calories and still lose more weight than a low cal high carb diet. But I
    lost the link to the study for this.... thanks!

  7. Glassman said:


    How to disprove the "if you eat less calories than you burn off, you'll
    lose weight theory."

    You need to phrase that one differently. Phrased as-is
    you won't be able to disprove it because it's true.
    The key is the number of calories burned is more
    variable than most tend to think. You're looking for
    studies that show two different diets with the same
    total calories, and one triggers better loss than the
    other. Lots of those studies are still referenced in
    the support section of the Atkins web site.

    Quoted message said:

    I need to prove that you can eat alot more protein
    calories and still lose more weight than a low cal high carb diet. But I
    lost the link to the study for this.... thanks!

  8. Sorry very poorly worded on my part. Atkins said that you can eat more
    calories of LC than you can of HC, and still get better results. Or 2000
    calories of meat vs 2000 calories of bread will not give the same results.
    Is this better?

    --
    JK Sinrod
    Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
    www.sinrodstudios.com
    Coney Island Memories
    www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

  9. Sorry very poorly worded on my part. Atkins said that you can eat more
    calories of LC than you can of HC, and still get better results. Or 2000
    calories of meat vs 2000 calories of bread will not give the same results.
    Is this better?

    --
    JK Sinrod
    Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
    www.sinrodstudios.com
    Coney Island Memories
    www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

  10. Glassman said:

    Sorry very poorly worded on my part. Atkins said that you can eat more
    calories of LC than you can of HC, and still get better results. Or 2000
    calories of meat vs 2000 calories of bread will not give the same results.
    Is this better?

    To answer your basic question, yes there are studies that are
    looking at the low-fat vs low-carb debate.

    The one I'm aware of is at Rockefeller University Hospital:

    Summary: Volunteers needed to study the effects of low calorie,
    high carbohydrate diets vs. low calorie, high fat diets on weight
    loss.

    What are the objectives:
    To compare the effects of 2 low calorie diets on the loss of
    abdominal fat, body composition, and cardiovascular risk profile
    in overweight individuals.

    Who is eligible?
    You may be eligible to participate in the study if you are:

    * Healthy overweight male or female
    * Ages 30-50
    * BMI of 30-34.9 or
    o Women with BMI of 25-29.9 with a waist circumference
    greater than 35 inches or
    o Men with BMI of 25-29.9 with a waist circumference
    greater than 40 inches

    What is involved?

    * The study periods include a 10 week inpatient stay at the
    Rockefeller University Hospital
    * Volunteers stay in comfortable private rooms and will
    receive all meals, comprehensive physical exams, and blood tests
    at no cost.
    * Work or school are allowed during the study upon approval
    of the study investigators.
    * Compensation is provided upon completion of the study.

    Contact:
    Rockefeller University Hospital
    1230 York Avenue
    New York, NY 10022
    Telephone: 800-RUCARES (782-2737)
    Fax: 212-327-7373

    --
    Rudy - Remove the Z from my address to respond.

    "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
    -Emiliano Zapata

    Check out the a.s.d.l-c FAQ at:
    http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm

  11. Glassman said:

    Sorry very poorly worded on my part. Atkins said that you can eat more
    calories of LC than you can of HC, and still get better results. Or 2000
    calories of meat vs 2000 calories of bread will not give the same results.
    Is this better?

    To answer your basic question, yes there are studies that are
    looking at the low-fat vs low-carb debate.

    The one I'm aware of is at Rockefeller University Hospital:

    Summary: Volunteers needed to study the effects of low calorie,
    high carbohydrate diets vs. low calorie, high fat diets on weight
    loss.

    What are the objectives:
    To compare the effects of 2 low calorie diets on the loss of
    abdominal fat, body composition, and cardiovascular risk profile
    in overweight individuals.

    Who is eligible?
    You may be eligible to participate in the study if you are:

    * Healthy overweight male or female
    * Ages 30-50
    * BMI of 30-34.9 or
    o Women with BMI of 25-29.9 with a waist circumference
    greater than 35 inches or
    o Men with BMI of 25-29.9 with a waist circumference
    greater than 40 inches

    What is involved?

    * The study periods include a 10 week inpatient stay at the
    Rockefeller University Hospital
    * Volunteers stay in comfortable private rooms and will
    receive all meals, comprehensive physical exams, and blood tests
    at no cost.
    * Work or school are allowed during the study upon approval
    of the study investigators.
    * Compensation is provided upon completion of the study.

    Contact:
    Rockefeller University Hospital
    1230 York Avenue
    New York, NY 10022
    Telephone: 800-RUCARES (782-2737)
    Fax: 212-327-7373

    --
    Rudy - Remove the Z from my address to respond.

    "It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!"
    -Emiliano Zapata

    Check out the a.s.d.l-c FAQ at:
    http://www.grossweb.com/asdlc/faq.htm

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.