The Decree

In article <[email hidden]>,

(Victor Sack) said:

Official Announcement

Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".

The Cabal (TINC)

To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 10-20-05 with a note from Niece Jo.

Melba's Jammin said:

(Victor Sack) said:

Official Announcement

Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".

The Cabal (TINC)

To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.

But winter is coming on soon. She's gonna catch a chill and needs some
protection from the wintry blasts. I suggest she augment the outfit
(TINO - really!) with like a fur stole or something. But I agree that
D-i-t-N-w-l-a-f-s-o-s is a bit much.

No, seriously...

Pastorio

Melba's Jammin said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

(Victor Sack) said:

Official Announcement

Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".

The Cabal (TINC)

To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
Indemnity.

If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.

Margaret Suran said:

Quoted message said:

(Victor Sack) said:

Official Announcement

Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".

The Cabal (TINC)

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

The offender in question has brought it all upon herself by discarding
her historic Dress and exposing herself to the innocent trollop
multitudes, thereby nearly causing a riot. Thus, the Cabal's (TINC)
decree is actually to be considered an exceptionally mild and forgiving
one, especially as it takes into account the offender's agreement to
retain her "Damsel" designation.

It is worth knowing that the offender maintains that she is not
completely naked but is wearing some unspecified, but likely revealing,
underwear, presumably to excite the masses still further. As long as
there is no independent confirmation of this fact, there is nothing to
be done. If such is forthcoming, and depending on the nature of the
unmentionables in question, there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".

The Cabal (TINC)

In article <[email hidden]>,
Terry Pulliam Burd <[email hidden]> wrote:
(snippage)

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
Indemnity.

If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.

<apologies for not snipping, but I couldn't figure out what to snip>

As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
face.

Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd

I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the [censored]
down pat.
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 10-20-05 with a note from Niece Jo.

Margaret Suran said:

Melba's Jammin said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (Victor Sack) wrote:

In article <[email hidden]>,

(Victor Sack) said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Official Announcement

Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".

The Cabal (TINC)

To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
Indemnity.

If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.

<apologies for not snipping, but I couldn't figure out what to snip>

As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
face.

Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

(Victor Sack) said:

Quoted message said:

> Official Announcement
>
>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
>
>The Cabal (TINC)

As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
face.

The above paralegal opinion is hereby declared irrelevant, without merit
and thus null and void, for the offender in question is not some
ordinary "sister trollop", but the one and only Head Trollop, who,
moreover, explicitly and publicly acknowledged The Cabal's (TINC)
jurisdiction over her moniker.

The not-so-concealed sneaky attempts from some corners to denigrate the
person of Head Trollop have not escaped The Cabal's (TINC) notice.
Grave as her offences are, they do not warrant equating her with
ordinary sister trollops, let alone with invertebrates like shrimp,
naked though they might be. It is clear that some individuals are using
the current scandal for actively trying to undermine and ultimately
usurp the Head Trollop's enviable position under the guise of defending
the indefensible. The Cabal (TINC) is, for the time being, reserving
action against the individuals involved.

The Cabal (TINC)

Victor Sack said:

there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".

OMG You are absolutely hysterical.... I can't stop laughing!

😄

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.

Hey, I "resemble" that!

😉

Melba's Jammin said:

I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the [censored]
down pat.

She wrote it, they signed it. That's why they got the big bucks.

Victor Sack said:

Margaret Suran said:

Quoted message said:

[email hidden] (Victor Sack) wrote:

> Official Announcement
>
>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
>
>The Cabal (TINC)

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

The offender in question has brought it all upon herself by discarding
her historic Dress and exposing herself to the innocent trollop
multitudes, thereby nearly causing a riot. Thus, the Cabal's (TINC)
decree is actually to be considered an exceptionally mild and forgiving
one, especially as it takes into account the offender's agreement to
retain her "Damsel" designation.

"Innocent trollop" is an oxymoron.

Quoted message said:

It is worth knowing that the offender maintains that she is not
completely naked but is wearing some unspecified, but likely revealing,
underwear, presumably to excite the masses still further. As long as
there is no independent confirmation of this fact, there is nothing to
be done. If such is forthcoming, and depending on the nature of the
unmentionables in question, there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".

Fruit of the Loom cotton granny panties. Size 10.

Phlbt!
Me

Terry Pulliam Burd said:

Margaret Suran said:

Melba's Jammin said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (Victor Sack) wrote:

In article <[email hidden]>,

(Victor Sack) said:

Quoted message said:

> Official Announcement
>
>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
>
>The Cabal (TINC)

To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
Indemnity.

If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.

<apologies for not snipping, but I couldn't figure out what to snip>

As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
face.

Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.

Thanks so much for your efforts, Terry. But I've caved under Victor's
brutal bullying. 🙁

Carol

Carol

In article <[email hidden]>,

Damsel-in-dese-Drawers said:

Victor Sack said:

Margaret Suran said:

> [email hidden] (Victor Sack) wrote:
>
>> Official Announcement
>>
>>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
>>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
>>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
>>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
>>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
>>
>>The Cabal (TINC)

I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

The offender in question has brought it all upon herself by discarding
her historic Dress and exposing herself to the innocent trollop
multitudes, thereby nearly causing a riot. Thus, the Cabal's (TINC)
decree is actually to be considered an exceptionally mild and forgiving
one, especially as it takes into account the offender's agreement to
retain her "Damsel" designation.

"Innocent trollop" is an oxymoron.

Quoted message said:

It is worth knowing that the offender maintains that she is not
completely naked but is wearing some unspecified, but likely revealing,
underwear, presumably to excite the masses still further. As long as
there is no independent confirmation of this fact, there is nothing to
be done. If such is forthcoming, and depending on the nature of the
unmentionables in question, there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".

Fruit of the Loom cotton granny panties. Size 10.

Phlbt!
Me

TMI, Dams, T M I
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 10-20-05 with a note from Niece Jo.

Melba's Jammin said:

I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the [censored]
down pat.

First of all, I like being a paralegal, esp. with the boss I have who
respects my experience and values my advice. Also, I don't have to
deal with bullsh*t clients the way he does and the CLE requirements
are dead easy *and* a court calendar doesn't rule my life (call a temp
service and I'm outta there). As to the second part of your question,
I started law school twice. The ex, Mr. Corporate America, got
transferred during a) my first year in law school, and b) my second
year in law school. That's nearly three years down the tubes. The next
time we moved, I enrolled in our local law school's paralegal program
immediately, which took 2 years, and here you are. And the law degree
is a JD. They quit hading out LLBs somewhere during the administration
of Warren G. Harding <veg>

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Melba's Jammin said:

I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the [censored]
down pat.

First of all, I like being a paralegal, esp. with the boss I have who
respects my experience and values my advice. Also, I don't have to
deal with bullsh*t clients the way he does and the CLE requirements
are dead easy *and* a court calendar doesn't rule my life (call a temp
service and I'm outta there). As to the second part of your question,
I started law school twice. The ex, Mr. Corporate America, got
transferred during a) my first year in law school, and b) my second
year in law school. That's nearly three years down the tubes. The next
time we moved, I enrolled in our local law school's paralegal program
immediately, which took 2 years, and here you are. And the law degree
is a JD. They quit hading out LLBs somewhere during the administration
of Warren G. Harding <veg>

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Melba's Jammin said:

I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the [censored]
down pat.

First of all, I like being a paralegal, esp. with the boss I have who
respects my experience and values my advice. Also, I don't have to
deal with bullsh*t clients the way he does and the CLE requirements
are dead easy *and* a court calendar doesn't rule my life (call a temp
service and I'm outta there). As to the second part of your question,
I started law school twice. The ex, Mr. Corporate America, got
transferred during a) my first year in law school, and b) my second
year in law school. That's nearly three years down the tubes. The next
time we moved, I enrolled in our local law school's paralegal program
immediately, which took 2 years, and here you are. And the law degree
is a JD. They quit hading out LLBs somewhere during the administration
of Warren G. Harding <veg>

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:28:10 +0100, [email hidden] (Victor Sack)
wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

It is clear that some individuals are using
the current scandal for actively trying to undermine and ultimately
usurp the Head Trollop's enviable position under the guise of defending
the indefensible. The Cabal (TINC) is, for the time being, reserving
action against the individuals involved.

Victuh, youse totally misunduhstands my position heah, which is
consigliere for dah Trollops, an' in pahticulah da Head Trollop, Dams,
whose legal position is dat TINC ain't got no joorisdiction over Dams
or da Trollops as Dams ain't got no legal ability to waive any of da
Trollops' rights and responsibilities over dere monikers. Ain't no way
no stinkin' TINCs gots joorisdiction here an' I gots case law to prove
it: Trollops v. Peanut Butter and Mayonnaise Sandwich (9th Cir. 1995)
319 F.3d 575, 579 and Anita Bryant v. Trollops (1988) 534 S.Ct. 767,
768 and statchoot: U.S.C. Section 7 Come 11.

Sos, if youse wants a legal battle, youse got one: ketchup-filled
squirt guns at 3 paces, mistuh!

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:28:10 +0100, [email hidden] (Victor Sack)
wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

It is clear that some individuals are using
the current scandal for actively trying to undermine and ultimately
usurp the Head Trollop's enviable position under the guise of defending
the indefensible. The Cabal (TINC) is, for the time being, reserving
action against the individuals involved.

Victuh, youse totally misunduhstands my position heah, which is
consigliere for dah Trollops, an' in pahticulah da Head Trollop, Dams,
whose legal position is dat TINC ain't got no joorisdiction over Dams
or da Trollops as Dams ain't got no legal ability to waive any of da
Trollops' rights and responsibilities over dere monikers. Ain't no way
no stinkin' TINCs gots joorisdiction here an' I gots case law to prove
it: Trollops v. Peanut Butter and Mayonnaise Sandwich (9th Cir. 1995)
319 F.3d 575, 579 and Anita Bryant v. Trollops (1988) 534 S.Ct. 767,
768 and statchoot: U.S.C. Section 7 Come 11.

Sos, if youse wants a legal battle, youse got one: ketchup-filled
squirt guns at 3 paces, mistuh!

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:28:10 +0100, [email hidden] (Victor Sack)
wrote:

<snip>

Quoted message said:

It is clear that some individuals are using
the current scandal for actively trying to undermine and ultimately
usurp the Head Trollop's enviable position under the guise of defending
the indefensible. The Cabal (TINC) is, for the time being, reserving
action against the individuals involved.

Victuh, youse totally misunduhstands my position heah, which is
consigliere for dah Trollops, an' in pahticulah da Head Trollop, Dams,
whose legal position is dat TINC ain't got no joorisdiction over Dams
or da Trollops as Dams ain't got no legal ability to waive any of da
Trollops' rights and responsibilities over dere monikers. Ain't no way
no stinkin' TINCs gots joorisdiction here an' I gots case law to prove
it: Trollops v. Peanut Butter and Mayonnaise Sandwich (9th Cir. 1995)
319 F.3d 575, 579 and Anita Bryant v. Trollops (1988) 534 S.Ct. 767,
768 and statchoot: U.S.C. Section 7 Come 11.

Sos, if youse wants a legal battle, youse got one: ketchup-filled
squirt guns at 3 paces, mistuh!

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"