lets get one thing straight

fashizzle said:

The human body does not use carbohydrates for energy. We do not use
sugar for energy. Or glucose for energy.

That might be one of the dumbest things ever said on MFW.

Wow.

Quoted message said:

We get our energy, are powered
by, ATP. Adenosine triphosphate (among some other things that aren't
glucose). Yes, everything must enter glycolysis to produce ATP, but
glucose by itself does not power the body.

Nothing by itself powers the body, so what?

Quoted message said:

There's a powerful bond
between phosphates in ATP and it's ready to burst and there's a lot of
energy packed in there. That's my scientific explanation.

Bursting phosphates, got it.

Quoted message said:

If I'm wrong correct me and call me an idiot. I think about 1% of the
population knows about ATP. Just seems like it should be more. It's
annoying.

Idiot.

fashizzle said:

If I'm wrong correct me and call me an idiot.

Idiot.

Lascivious Mink said:

Idiot.

Shoot! You beat me to it...

Lascivious Mink said:

fashizzle said:

The human body does not use carbohydrates for energy. We do not use
sugar for energy. Or glucose for energy.

That might be one of the dumbest things ever said on MFW.

Wow.

Quoted message said:

We get our energy, are powered
by, ATP. Adenosine triphosphate (among some other things that aren't
glucose). Yes, everything must enter glycolysis to produce ATP, but
glucose by itself does not power the body.

Nothing by itself powers the body, so what?

Quoted message said:

There's a powerful bond
between phosphates in ATP and it's ready to burst and there's a lot of
energy packed in there. That's my scientific explanation.

Bursting phosphates, got it.

Quoted message said:

If I'm wrong correct me and call me an idiot. I think about 1% of the
population knows about ATP. Just seems like it should be more. It's
annoying.

Idiot.

You're were only allowed to call me an idiot if you "corrected me if I
was wrong." I don't see any corrections.

fashizzle said:

You're were only allowed to call me an idiot if you "corrected me if I
was wrong." I don't see any corrections.

Apparently you can't read either. He explained it in perfect english.

Quoted message said:

fashizzle said:

If I'm wrong correct me and call me an idiot.

Idiot.

Apparently "correct me if I'm wrong" is the hard part of that sentence.
ahhhhhh hah hahaha hahaha.

Quoted message said:

fashizzle said:

You're were only allowed to call me an idiot if you "corrected me if I
was wrong." I don't see any corrections.

Apparently you can't read either. He explained it in perfect english.

Those were corrections? I don't think so. Still waiting.

Lascivious Mink said:

Nothing by itself powers the body, so what?

Wo. That is just genius dude. What does that mean? Nothing. Zero.
Zilch. You.

fashizzle said:

Apparently "correct me if I'm wrong" is the hard part of that sentence.

So you can't read, even your own posts. Thank you for proving you
really are an idiot.

fashizzle said:

Still waiting.

I hope you're sitting on your thumbs while you wait.

Quoted message said:

fashizzle said:

Apparently "correct me if I'm wrong" is the hard part of that sentence.

So you can't read, even your own posts. Thank you for proving you
really are an idiot.

Ok so correct something that I said in my post to justify calling me an
idiot. It's not hard. I didn't say anything difficult. Well?

fashizzle said:

The human body does not use carbohydrates for energy. We do not use
sugar for energy. Or glucose for energy. We get our energy, are powered
by, ATP. Adenosine triphosphate (among some other things that aren't
glucose). Yes, everything must enter glycolysis to produce ATP, but
glucose by itself does not power the body.

So instead of silly carbs and proteins and fats we should all just
consume ATP? Cool!

Quoted message said:

There's a powerful bond
between phosphates in ATP and it's ready to burst and there's a lot of
energy packed in there. That's my scientific explanation.

I've got one about training your enzymes to be better butter burners. I
think I can trot it out and top your science with my voodoo magic.
Shall we try?

Quoted message said:

If I'm wrong correct me and call me an idiot. I think about 1% of the
population knows about ATP. Just seems like it should be more. It's
annoying.

ATP is part of how. But it isn't the piece of the process that we can
control. We get to control the inputs. Which happen to be carbs,
proteins, fats and alcohol.

Quoted message said:

fashizzle

Cool name. What's in mean?

Are you here to troll us? You started out well, with a strong
assertion. Have you been studying up on this?

Trolling, I mean.

Dally

fashizzle said:

Lascivious Mink said:

Nothing by itself powers the body, so what?

Wo. That is just genius dude. What does that mean? Nothing. Zero.

Hey folks, we got a new troll. Pretty imaginative if you ask me.
Making up big words, and claiming only 1% of us know about it, is
creative genius. I give him a 5.5

fashizzle said:

The human body does not use carbohydrates for energy. We do not use
sugar for energy. Or glucose for energy. We get our energy, are powered
by, ATP. Adenosine triphosphate (among some other things that aren't
glucose).

ATP is for intra-cellular energy transfer. The energy has to be transported
to the cells somehow.

Quoted message said:

Yes, everything must enter glycolysis to produce ATP, but
glucose by itself does not power the body. There's a powerful bond
between phosphates in ATP and it's ready to burst and there's a lot of
energy packed in there. That's my scientific explanation.

If I'm wrong correct me and call me an idiot. I think about 1% of the
population knows about ATP. Just seems like it should be more. It's
annoying.

fashizzle

Recent studies show that the brain is quite happy to use ketones for energy
in preference to glucose.

If all else fails you can try ethanol as a fuel source 😄

gtoomey

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 02:35:44 GMT, Gregory Toomey <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

If all else fails you can try ethanol as a fuel source 😄

I think he's already drank a bit too much of it.

On 19 Oct 2005 18:19:07 -0700, "fashizzle" <[email hidden]> wrote:

I'd call this the dumbest troll post i've seen in a long time, but
that would be giving it too much credit...

Slambram said:

I'd call this the dumbest troll post i've seen in a long time, but
that would be giving it too much credit...

I thought he was quite creative.

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

Slambram said:

I'd call this the dumbest troll post i've seen in a long time, but
that would be giving it too much credit...

I thought he was quite creative.

That comment coming from another troll does not count.

Cheers!
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-[censored]." -Jack Nicholson

OmManiPadmeOmelet said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Quoted message said:

Slambram said:

I'd call this the dumbest troll post i've seen in a long time, but
that would be giving it too much credit...

I thought he was quite creative.

That comment coming from another troll does not count.

Cheers!

One might almost believe they are one and the same 😉
--
Perre
I gave up on SPAM and redirected it to hotmail instead.