A meaningless poll, especially since only US consumers were targeted with the ads promoting it on
OLN. Europeans (and others) might have access to the site, but what good is it if they do not
know about it?
So Chechu wins, simply because Paul Sherwin mentioned his name more times than any of the other
guys. He may well be the best one, but make no mistake: he won because he worked for lance and
because Sherwin/Liggett mentioned his name more than the others.
Very few mentions about the leadout trains who were able to consistently deliver the top sprinters
to the line during the flats. They never get any credit. It's way harder to lead out a sprinter than
it is to be 140 lbs and ride in front of lance for a few miles on a hill.
"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:"warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:In article said:DiabloScott wrote:
> As of July 25: Rubiera 35% Heras 24% Hincapie 18% Pena 8% Beltran 5% Landis 3% Ekimov 2%
> Padrnos 0% Seems to me Beltran's big efforts came during the more decisive
stages -
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> but Chechu's definitely earned his paycheck.
It's Chechu 33% Rubiera 22% Hincapie (!) 22% Heras 8% Pena 6% Beltran
I think the results are skewed by the fact that Hincappie, Pena, Beltran, Ekimov do most of
their work before the TV coverage begins.
Agreed, the early workers are just as important as the late ones.
If the early ones can't do their job, then everyone moves up a notch. Multiply that by a few
riders and there's no one left to do the late work.
Those polls are meaningless - the only ones who could really tell you who was most valuable would
be those on the team (or perhaps their competitors).