Simon Caldwell said:The claimed advantage is that they don't break as easily - they'll
bend but not snap.
You're right about the "as easily", but having seen my carbon track
poles bend quite significantly when out skiing with them I know they do
bend!
Problem with carbon fibre is it's far more prone to stress fracturing,
so if you put a bad scratch in it then that will serve as a stress focus
and subsequently a break point. So while carbon ski poles are very
popular with nordic skiers who don't have sharp metal edges on their
skis, it's not nearly so common in downhill setups with steel edged skis.
Using poles where I walk, through rocky mountains with boulder fields, I
wouldn't want carbon poles. But there's plenty of places where they'd
be no real problem at all.
Quoted message said:I remain to be convinced that this is enough to warrant the price tag
though.
For XC skiing where you want to do more than pootle I think the carbon
poles are worth it, but I wouldn't personally bother with carbon or
titanium otherwise. My aluminium poles aren't enough of a drag that I
feel any need to improve them.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/