UK and Europe · Public discussion

Changes at ChapmanCentral

Started by Just zis Guy, you know? · · Last activity · 10 posts · 331 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
15 September 2005
Last activity
15 September 2005
Original author
Just zis Guy, you know?
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
331
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Just a few minor ones: a new, faster server is now online, and my
    broadband has been upped to 2Mbit, so for those who are interested
    there should be less waiting around now.

    My eyesight is recovering slowly, so I might even get around to some
    new content in the next couple of days.

    The server software is beta (Domino R7 beta 4 to be exact) so please
    be patient if there are niggles. Looks pretty solid so far, though,
    or I would have stuck with the Gold release.

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

  2. Guy,

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable,
    and you've upgraded to 2Mbit - this won't make any difference whatever
    to the speed we get your website.

  3. iakobski said:

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable,
    and you've upgraded to 2Mbit - this won't make any difference whatever
    to the speed we get your website.

    Agreed - unless you've bought SDSL, your upstream bandwidth will still
    be 256kbps. The only speedup will be the rate at which our HTTP requests
    arrive, although a) they are negligible in size and b) our upstream
    bandwidth will limit it.

    Nice for you, no difference for us.

    --
    Mark.
    http://tranchant.plus.com/

  4. iakobski said:

    Guy,

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable,
    and you've upgraded to 2Mbit - this won't make any difference whatever
    to the speed we get your website.

    Unless he's bonded a couple of 1Mb/s lines together...

  5. "Mark Tranchant" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    iakobski said:

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable,
    and you've upgraded to 2Mbit - this won't make any difference whatever
    to the speed we get your website.

    Agreed - unless you've bought SDSL, your upstream bandwidth will still be
    256kbps. The only speedup will be the rate at which our HTTP requests
    arrive, although a) they are negligible in size and b) our upstream
    bandwidth will limit it.

    Nice for you, no difference for us.

    Kind of agreed. Unless his upload was 128kb before ...

    Still, your 2kb tcp/ip query will get there quicker ...

  6. iakobski said:

    Guy,

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable, and
    you've upgraded to 2Mbit


    Said server would appear to be somewhere on Demon.
    Unclear from the hostnames (and two hops are not named) if this is ADSL.

    lon1-bthg-aj1c.access.demon.net (194.159.246.82) 5.448 ms 2.933 ms 4.076 ms
    9 217.47.132.233 (217.47.132.233) 4.792 ms 5.009 ms 4.371 ms
    10 217.47.132.132 (217.47.132.132) 5.222 ms 6.533 ms 5.028 ms
    11 chapmancentral.demon.co.uk

    I would nmap it, but that wouldn't be considered very gentlemanly conduct.

  7. John Hearns said:
    iakobski said:

    Guy,

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable, and
    you've upgraded to 2Mbit


    Said server would appear to be somewhere on Demon.
    Unclear from the hostnames (and two hops are not named) if this is ADSL.

    lon1-bthg-aj1c.access.demon.net (194.159.246.82) 5.448 ms 2.933 ms 4.076 ms

    Seems to imply ADSL (bthg = BT home gateway)

    Quoted message said:

    9 217.47.132.233 (217.47.132.233) 4.792 ms 5.009 ms 4.371 ms
    10 217.47.132.132 (217.47.132.132) 5.222 ms 6.533 ms 5.028 ms

    These hops through BT's network pinpoint it further to a 'classic'
    (ie not l2tp) delivery IP Stream 155meg ADSL pipe.

    --
    Andy

  8. Andy Furnell said:


    Quoted message said:


    lon1-bthg-aj1c.access.demon.net (194.159.246.82) 5.448 ms 2.933 ms
    4.076 ms

    Seems to imply ADSL (bthg = BT home gateway)


    One learns something new every day. Seriously.
    Now, all we have to do is emerge from a manhole somewhere close
    to Chapman Towers.

  9. "John Hearns" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Andy Furnell said:


    Quoted message said:


    lon1-bthg-aj1c.access.demon.net (194.159.246.82) 5.448 ms 2.933 ms
    4.076 ms

    Seems to imply ADSL (bthg = BT home gateway)


    One learns something new every day. Seriously.
    Now, all we have to do is emerge from a manhole somewhere close
    to Chapman Towers.

    Send a spike .. sorry .. watched GoldenEye the other night ...

  10. I submit that on or about 15 Sep 2005 02:45:38 -0700, the person known
    to the court as "iakobski" <[email hidden]> made a statement
    (<[email hidden]> in Your
    Honour's bundle) to the following effect:

    Quoted message said:

    If by this you mean you're running the webserver over ADSL or cable,
    and you've upgraded to 2Mbit - this won't make any difference whatever
    to the speed we get your website.

    Depends: I use a fair bit myself, so there should be more left for you
    lot :-)

    Guy
    --
    http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

    "To every complex problem there is a solution which is
    simple, neat and wrong" - HL Mencken

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.