UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle Computer

Started by Anonymous · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,602 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 July 2003
Last activity
31 July 2003
Original author
Anonymous
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,602
Views / 30 days
2

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This may seem a silly question but not quite got the brain in gear this morning yet!

    I have just bought a bike computer thing to put on my mountain bike as an extra 'toy' to play with.

    The cable that goes from the computer mount to the sensor attached to the bike is very long and
    there is a lot of excess if I mount it on one of the front forks.

    I have checked and it will reach to a suitable mounting place on the rear wheel.

    Is there any reason why I shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel, after all both wheels must be going
    at the same speed!!

    Cheers

    Andy

  2. "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This may seem a silly question but not quite got the brain in gear this morning yet!

    I have just bought a bike computer thing to put on my mountain bike as an extra 'toy' to
    play with.

    The cable that goes from the computer mount to the sensor attached to the bike is very long and
    there is a lot of excess if I mount it on one of the front forks.

    I have checked and it will reach to a suitable mounting place on the rear wheel.

    Is there any reason why I shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel, after all both wheels must be
    going at the same speed!!

    Cheers

    Andy

    In a word NO !

    One possible issue is whether the sensor will be able to be set close enough to the spoke mounted
    magnet as there may more space between rear stays and the spokes than there is on the front forks.

    RG

  3. In message <[email hidden]>, Andy Laycock

    Quoted message said:

    This may seem a silly question but not quite got the brain in gear this morning yet!

    I have just bought a bike computer thing to put on my mountain bike as an extra 'toy' to play with.

    The cable that goes from the computer mount to the sensor attached to the bike is very long and
    there is a lot of excess if I mount it on one of the front forks.

    I have checked and it will reach to a suitable mounting place on the rear wheel.

    Is there any reason why I shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel, after all both wheels must be going
    at the same speed!!

    Cheers

    Andy


    There's no reason why you shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel provided you can get magnet and
    sensor close enough. It might even be supposed to go there. Mine is. (Rear wheel mounting allows
    you to use it on a trainer.)
    --
    Michael MacClancy

  4. . It might even be supposed

    Quoted message said:

    to go there. Mine is. (Rear wheel mounting allows you to use it on a trainer.)

    The fitting instructions show it on the front wheel. Think I will put it on the rear wheel, makes it
    look much tidier as well, less clutter round the handlebars with the extra wire.

    Thanks very much

    Andy

  5. Andy Laycock said:

    . It might even be supposed

    Quoted message said:

    to go there. Mine is. (Rear wheel mounting allows you to use it on a trainer.)

    The fitting instructions show it on the front wheel. Think I will put it on the rear wheel, makes
    it look much tidier as well, less clutter round the handlebars with the extra wire.

    Thanks very much

    Andy

    just make sure it doesn't pull the wire too tight when you turn the bars to their extremities. the
    alternative it to neatly wrap the surpls wire around a gear/brake cable outer with a bit of tape at
    both ends to secure it.

    i also find that the 'go faster tape' used for coach-lining on cars in 3 or 5mm wide is ideal for
    fixing wires to frames neatly. get it from most auto spares shops.

    --
    Pete

    interchange 12 for 21 to reply

  6. Andy Laycock said:

    Is there any reason why I shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel, after all both wheels must be
    going at the same speed!!

    It's actually slightly more accurate to use the rear wheel as front travels further than rest of
    bike! I'll leave you to ponder on that one.
    :-)

    I prefer using the front because the down tube is easier to clean and looks nicer without a wire and
    fixings on it.

    ~PB

  7. I'm sure there shouldn't be a problem. I think that most cycle computers that have a cadance
    function (and therefore need a sensor for the cranks as well as a wheel) fit their wheel sensors on
    the rear wheel so whether your computer is intended to fitted to the front wheel or either, it
    should still work.

    Some computers (I think that the Sigma Sport 1600 is one) can be upgraded to take a cadance sensor
    at a later date, perhaps yours can in which case the extra cable might be there to allow rear
    wheel fitting.

    Good luck Paul.

  8. Paul said:

    I'm sure there shouldn't be a problem. I think that most cycle computers that have a cadance
    function (and therefore need a sensor for the cranks as well as a wheel) fit their wheel sensors
    on the rear wheel so whether your computer is intended to fitted to the front wheel or either, it
    should still work.

    Some computers (I think that the Sigma Sport 1600 is one) can be upgraded to take a cadance sensor
    at a later date, perhaps yours can in which case the extra cable might be there to allow rear
    wheel fitting.

    Good luck Paul.


    If you ever suspect you might use your bike on a trainer indoors, it's worth fitting to the rear
    wheel instead of front, even though it's a longer cable run (if wired). Took me a couple of moments
    to realise why nothing showed up on my Flightdeck when I first stuck mine on the trainer (flightdeck
    is front wheel fit only)! Now, I'm stuck with having two sets of wiring etc on it, as I can't live
    without the flightdeck!

    Velvet

  9. "Pete Biggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Andy Laycock said:

    Is there any reason why I shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel, after all both wheels must be
    going at the same speed!!

    It's actually slightly more accurate to use the rear wheel as front travels further than rest of
    bike! I'll leave you to ponder on that one.
    :-)

    The other issue to factor in when using the rear wheel is any tendency for wheelspin on either icy
    surfaces or loose gravel ;-)

    RG

    Quoted message said:


    I prefer using the front because the down tube is easier to clean and looks nicer without a wire
    and fixings on it.

    ~PB

  10. "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This may seem a silly question but not quite got the brain in gear this morning yet!

    I have just bought a bike computer thing to put on my mountain bike as an extra 'toy' to
    play with.

    The cable that goes from the computer mount to the sensor attached to the bike is very long and
    there is a lot of excess if I mount it on one of the front forks.

    I have checked and it will reach to a suitable mounting place on the rear wheel.

    Is there any reason why I shouldn't mount it on the rear wheel, after all both wheels must be
    going at the same speed!!

    Cheers

    Andy

    CicloSport and Specialized both offer multi-function cyclometer's that are back lit by a lighting
    systems similar to the Timex "indiglo" technology. Very low drain on the battery yet plenty of
    light. Not sure what's available there in the UK but you can always pick them up online.

    Prometheus

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.