UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle computer for repetitive course

Started by MikeC · · Last activity · 8 posts · 437 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 August 2007
Last activity
14 August 2007
Original author
MikeC
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
437
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Folks,

    Many of us ride a repetitive course, whether it be to work and back, or
    because (like myself) they are on a diet and to make the most of the
    exercise, are trying to measure themselves against previous performance.

    It strikes me that a cycle computer that measures the course moment by
    moment would be a feasible proposition. I have just worked out that with a
    28" wheel, it will go around 21608 times during a 30-mile ride. If a
    computer was to store a 4-byte timestamp once every time the wheel went
    around, it would take about 100KBytes of memory to record a 30 mile trip,
    and that's not much memory. My MP3 player is about the size of a cycle
    computer, and it has 1GB of memory.

    The advantage of such a computer is that as you are following the same
    course as when the ride was originally recorded, it could tell you moment by
    moment how far behind or ahead you are of yesterday's performance. At the
    end of the ride, you could decide whether today's performance is the one to
    use as a criterion, hit a button, and it saves today's for furure
    comparison.

    They say there's no such thing as an original idea (if I thought it was, I'd
    consider a patent instead of making it public), so here's my question to you
    all - does such a device exist? Where can I find out about it?

    Thanks,

    MikeC.

    --
    Mental decryption required to bamboozle spam robots:

    mike_best$ntlworld*com
    $ = @
    * = dot

  2. MikeC said:

    Folks,

    Many of us ride a repetitive course, whether it be to work and back, or
    because (like myself) they are on a diet and to make the most of the
    exercise, are trying to measure themselves against previous performance.

    It strikes me that a cycle computer that measures the course moment by
    moment would be a feasible proposition. I have just worked out that with a
    28" wheel, it will go around 21608 times during a 30-mile ride. If a
    computer was to store a 4-byte timestamp once every time the wheel went
    around, it would take about 100KBytes of memory to record a 30 mile trip,
    and that's not much memory. My MP3 player is about the size of a cycle
    computer, and it has 1GB of memory.

    The advantage of such a computer is that as you are following the same
    course as when the ride was originally recorded, it could tell you moment by
    moment how far behind or ahead you are of yesterday's performance. At the
    end of the ride, you could decide whether today's performance is the one to
    use as a criterion, hit a button, and it saves today's for furure
    comparison.

    They say there's no such thing as an original idea (if I thought it was, I'd
    consider a patent instead of making it public), so here's my question to you
    all - does such a device exist? Where can I find out about it?

    Thanks,

    MikeC.

    --
    Mental decryption required to bamboozle spam robots:

    mike_best$ntlworld*com
    $ = @
    * = dot

    Interesting, im not aware of one but surely it must exist!

  3. MikeC said:

    The advantage of such a computer is that as you are following the same
    course as when the ride was originally recorded, it could tell you moment by
    moment how far behind or ahead you are of yesterday's performance. At the
    end of the ride, you could decide whether today's performance is the one to
    use as a criterion, hit a button, and it saves today's for furure
    comparison.

    They say there's no such thing as an original idea (if I thought it was, I'd
    consider a patent instead of making it public), so here's my question to you
    all - does such a device exist? Where can I find out about it?

    I believe there's a few GPS devices that can do this.
    Look at Garmin's 'fitness' range - the Forerunner (wrist mounted) and
    the Edge (designed for use on a bike).

    They have a "Virtual Partner" mode - I've not used them, but I think it
    works something like how you describe.

    --
    Craig Wallace
    http://craig.neogeo.org.uk
    http://www.neogeo.org.uk

  4. MikeC said:

    Folks,

    Many of us ride a repetitive course, whether it be to work and back, or
    because (like myself) they are on a diet and to make the most of the
    exercise, are trying to measure themselves against previous performance.

    The problem with this idea is that we all take deviations
    from our route, e.g. to over take cars, try a different
    route, use a different lane etc. So the distance you cycle
    on the same route every day varies. It would have to have
    some GPS functionality to be reasonable useful.

    Also there are things like traffic lights. Some days I
    shoot through them at 20mph, other days I have to stop and
    wait for 30s. But at the next set of lights it might be
    the other way round to normal.

    TBH I think this could be better implemented for
    commuters, I need to know that absolute time[1] that I am
    at a certain point, not the relative time from my journey
    start[2].

    If I arrive at my halfway point, and the computer says
    that I am 1 min. up, but I left four minutes late, then I
    might relax a bit, and be late for work.
    I think an absolute time function would be useful, as well
    as an average journey time for that section, rather than
    just comparing to the best time.
    Also for commuters, setting a desired arrival time, in
    case you have to start an hour early one day.

    [1] i.e. GMT/BST
    [2] I only look at the journey time when I am nearly there.

  5. "Martin Dann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    MikeC said:

    Folks,

    Many of us ride a repetitive course, whether it be to work and back, or
    because (like myself) they are on a diet and to make the most of the
    exercise, are trying to measure themselves against previous performance.

    The problem with this idea is that we all take deviations from our route,
    e.g. to over take cars, try a different route, use a different lane etc.
    So the distance you cycle on the same route every day varies. It would
    have to have some GPS functionality to be reasonable useful.

    Also there are things like traffic lights. Some days I shoot through them
    at 20mph, other days I have to stop and wait for 30s. But at the next set
    of lights it might be the other way round to normal.

    TBH I think this could be better implemented for commuters, I need to know
    that absolute time[1] that I am at a certain point, not the relative time
    from my journey start[2].

    If I arrive at my halfway point, and the computer says that I am 1 min.
    up, but I left four minutes late, then I might relax a bit, and be late
    for work.
    I think an absolute time function would be useful, as well as an average
    journey time for that section, rather than just comparing to the best
    time.
    Also for commuters, setting a desired arrival time, in case you have to
    start an hour early one day.

    [1] i.e. GMT/BST
    [2] I only look at the journey time when I am nearly there.

    Thanks for the reflections on what you would like. I think, for me, that
    I'd prefer what I described.
    I agree about traffic lights, etc, but if it held you up for 30 seconds, you
    would see you were 30 secs (or 200 Mtrs) behind what you had at this point
    yesterday - so either you would make it up or you'd try not to drop behind
    that. As you were riding along, you. see 30 secs..... 30 secs..... 32
    secs - "oh, damn, I'd better try a bit harder"

    And I don't believe that on a 10-12 mile route, using a different lane or
    overtaking a car would make any appreciable difference to the distance
    travelled.

    Regards,

    MikeC.

  6. "Craig Wallace" <craigw84@fast_NOSPAM_mail.fm> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    MikeC said:

    The advantage of such a computer is that as you are following the same
    course as when the ride was originally recorded, it could tell you moment
    by moment how far behind or ahead you are of yesterday's performance. At
    the end of the ride, you could decide whether today's performance is the
    one to use as a criterion, hit a button, and it saves today's for furure
    comparison.

    They say there's no such thing as an original idea (if I thought it was,
    I'd consider a patent instead of making it public), so here's my question
    to you all - does such a device exist? Where can I find out about it?

    I believe there's a few GPS devices that can do this.
    Look at Garmin's 'fitness' range - the Forerunner (wrist mounted) and the
    Edge (designed for use on a bike).

    They have a "Virtual Partner" mode - I've not used them, but I think it
    works something like how you describe.

    --
    Craig Wallace


    Thanks a lot, Craig,

    That chimes with something I came across a while back - I had a Duch
    colleague who said he had one that would do it - and it was wrist-mounted.
    A big thing - quite a bit bigger than a watch, but he also used it as such.

    I'll look it up.

    MikeC.

  7. "MikeC" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Folks,

    Many of us ride a repetitive course, whether it be to work and back, or
    because (like myself) they are on a diet and to make the most of the
    exercise, are trying to measure themselves against previous performance.

    It strikes me that a cycle computer that measures the course moment by
    moment would be a feasible proposition. I have just worked out that with
    a 28" wheel, it will go around 21608 times during a 30-mile ride. If a
    computer was to store a 4-byte timestamp once every time the wheel went
    around, it would take about 100KBytes of memory to record a 30 mile trip,
    and that's not much memory. My MP3 player is about the size of a cycle
    computer, and it has 1GB of memory.

    The advantage of such a computer is that as you are following the same
    course as when the ride was originally recorded, it could tell you moment
    by moment how far behind or ahead you are of yesterday's performance. At
    the end of the ride, you could decide whether today's performance is the
    one to use as a criterion, hit a button, and it saves today's for furure
    comparison.

    They say there's no such thing as an original idea (if I thought it was,
    I'd consider a patent instead of making it public), so here's my question
    to you all - does such a device exist? Where can I find out about it?

    Thanks,

    MikeC.

    One of the GPS's does something like this where you can race a previous
    time.

    http://www.wiggle.co.uk/ProductDetail.aspx?Cat=cycle&ProdID=5360020834

  8. MikeC said:

    Folks,

    Many of us ride a repetitive course, whether it be to work and back, or
    because (like myself) they are on a diet and to make the most of the
    exercise, are trying to measure themselves against previous performance.

    It strikes me that a cycle computer that measures the course moment by
    moment would be a feasible proposition. I have just worked out that with a
    28" wheel, it will go around 21608 times during a 30-mile ride. If a
    computer was to store a 4-byte timestamp once every time the wheel went
    around, it would take about 100KBytes of memory to record a 30 mile trip,
    and that's not much memory. My MP3 player is about the size of a cycle
    computer, and it has 1GB of memory.

    The advantage of such a computer is that as you are following the same
    course as when the ride was originally recorded, it could tell you moment by
    moment how far behind or ahead you are of yesterday's performance. At the
    end of the ride, you could decide whether today's performance is the one to
    use as a criterion, hit a button, and it saves today's for furure
    comparison.

    They say there's no such thing as an original idea (if I thought it was, I'd
    consider a patent instead of making it public), so here's my question to you
    all - does such a device exist? Where can I find out about it?

    That's an excellent idea. In computer games that's called a "ghost car".
    You probably should have patented it like mad before posting the idea on
    the internet.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.