Road Cycling · Public discussion

Weight and biking

Started by Sidewinder · · Last activity · 23 posts · 970 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 July 2005
Last activity
21 July 2005
Original author
Sidewinder
Posts
23
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
970
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 23
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic benefits.
    However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight likely to be a
    problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame, rims and spokes
    handle that much weight for a time without breaking down? Thank you.

  2. Sidewinder <[email hidden]> wrote:
    :> In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic
    :> benefits. However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight
    :> likely to be a problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the
    :> frame, rims and spokes handle that much weight for a time without
    :> breaking down? Thank you.

    Make sure you get a bike with 36-spoke wheels (for one thing!).

  3. More spokes would be better than less as Roger suggests.

    I'm 255lbs, 6'0" and have a 20 inch rear wheel with 32 spokes (folding
    bike).
    No problems thusfar.

    "Sidewinder" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic benefits.
    However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight likely to be a
    problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame, rims and
    spokes
    handle that much weight for a time without breaking down? Thank you.

  4. Sidewinder said:

    In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic benefits.
    However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight likely to be a
    problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame, rims and spokes
    handle that much weight for a time without breaking down? Thank you.


    Check the following web site - go to the "Clydesdale" Forum - it's for
    big guys and their special needs in terms of parts and sizing

    http://forums.mtbr.com/

    Tom

  5. recently asked my local Trek dealer how much is too much for a
    bike. He said Trek can haul up to 300 Lbs. I had a Fuji for a
    long time, but whenever my wieght fluctuated above 220Lbs, the
    left crank arm would unscrew itself!

    Good luck.

    ~Mo Fo

    "Sidewinder" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    : In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic
    benefits.
    : However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight
    likely to be a
    : problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame,
    rims and spokes
    : handle that much weight for a time without breaking down?
    Thank you.
    :
    :

  6. C.J.Patten said:


    More spokes would be better than less as Roger suggests.

    I'm 255lbs, 6'0" and have a 20 inch rear wheel with 32 spokes (folding
    bike).
    No problems thusfar.

    Structurally speaking, 32 spokes on a 20" wheel is roughly equivalent
    to 44 spokes on a 26" wheel. That's in terms of the span length
    between spokes. In overall strength, the 20" wheel is probably even
    stronger than that because its rim is stiffer to side loads.

    (They'd better be strong if you ride a recumbent, because you have to
    go over bumps like a sack of potatoes, without being able to "post" up
    off the saddle.)

    But the same principle applies to the difference between 26" and 700c
    wheels. All else equal (spoke count, rim cross section, etc.), the 26"
    wheels will be much stronger.

    Chalo Colina

  7. 6' 6" and 280 lbs:

    I'd say get a mountain bike with as large a frame as you can find
    and put straight-tread street tires on it for riding on pavement. Tioga
    City-slickers are my favorite such tires. You will need a bike with an
    extra-long seat stem and you might have to get a handlebar stem extender
    to raise it up to match the seat. The cables may have to be replaced
    with longer ones if the handlebars are raised very much.
    A Cromoly rear axle may be better to support your weight than the
    standard one that comes with the bike. I've just described the bike I
    rode when I loaded as much as 325 lbs. on it (myself, cargo box, tools,
    parts and a huge load of groceries).

    Steve McDonald

  8. Sidewinder said:

    In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic benefits.
    However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight likely to be a
    problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame, rims and spokes
    handle that much weight for a time without breaking down? Thank you.

    The thing to be concerned about is wheels. The important thing is to
    have them well set up by a good bike shop, if not, you will likely have
    lots of problems with loose/broken spokes.

    If you get serious about road biking, you might want to think about a
    touring bike, they are a good match to the needs of large riders.

  9. Sidewinder said:

    In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic benefits.
    However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight likely to be a
    problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame, rims and spokes
    handle that much weight for a time without breaking down? Thank you.

    You haven't said anything about where and how you plan to ride -- on
    the road, off-road, dirt paths, whatever. If, like many returning
    riders, you're planning on sticking a toe in the water by buying a
    hybrid or "comfort" bike, then you should concern yourself mostly with
    the dealer you buy it from.

    Buying a name brand bike (Trek, Cannondale, Jamis, Giant, Specialized,
    Bianchi, Fuji, etc., etc.) from a reputable dealer (ask around locally)
    will get you a a frame and components that will be properly assembled,
    something you can't count on from mass-market stores. The frame will
    likely have a lifetime guarantee.

    Far more importantly, a dealer will help you buy a bike that fits you
    properly, and help you get it properly adjusted in all the various ways
    that will match your particular body dimensions. Every body is
    different, and every bike needs to be custom fit to the rider. (Most
    riders end up doing this themselves, through necessity and by default,
    because the bike is painful to ride.) It is unlikely that a rider of
    your height and weight will find a suitable bike anywhere but at a
    dealer.

    Finally, a good dealer will properly prepare the wheels. Your concerns
    about weight bear mostly on this issue. Wheel failures are most common
    on machine-built wheels (ie, most wheels) that were not re-tensioned,
    trued, and stress-relieved by hand before being installed on the bike.
    When a wheel is properly prepared it should last for thousands of
    miles, even if it's an ordinary mass-produced wheel. Any decent
    36-spoke wheel should be fine at your weight, assuming it's set up
    right.

    RichC

  10. Quoted message said:
    Sidewinder said:

    In my old age I have decided to take up biking for the aerobic benefits.
    However, I am 6' 6" tall and weigh 280 lbs. Is my weight likely to be a
    problem for most any bicycle? For instance, can the frame, rims and spokes
    handle that much weight for a time without breaking down? Thank you.

    rdclark said:

    Far more importantly, a dealer will help you buy a bike that fits you
    properly, and help you get it properly adjusted in all the various ways
    that will match your particular body dimensions. Every body is
    different, and every bike needs to be custom fit to the rider. (Most
    riders end up doing this themselves, through necessity and by default,
    because the bike is painful to ride.) It is unlikely that a rider of
    your height and weight will find a suitable bike anywhere but at a
    dealer.

    In addition to wheels and bike fit, you should be wary of bikes with
    suspension (assuming you are riding primarily on the road). Most
    suspension parts are designed for riders in the 150-180lb weight range.
    On most comfort bikes, adjusting the suspension means replacing
    elastomers. A good dealer should be willing to readjust the suspension
    on the bike for your weight. If this isn't done properly, you will be
    bottoming out the suspension on relatively small bumps.

    Although none of my current road bikes have suspension, I had to go
    through an elastomer/spring swap on the front and spring swap on the
    back of my mountain bike. Before that, it was easy to squish the
    suspension to its stops just by hopping up and down in the street.

    -Buck

  11. "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Structurally speaking, 32 spokes on a 20" wheel is roughly equivalent
    to 44 spokes on a 26" wheel. That's in terms of the span length
    between spokes. In overall strength, the 20" wheel is probably even
    stronger than that because its rim is stiffer to side loads.

    Interesting - good to know.

    Quoted message said:

    (They'd better be strong if you ride a recumbent, because you have to
    go over bumps like a sack of potatoes, without being able to "post" up
    off the saddle.)

    Folding "wedgie" FWIW.
    http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html

    😉

  12. Buck said:


    In addition to wheels and bike fit, you should be wary of bikes with
    suspension

    Good point. If you insist on (or can't avoid)suspension features (too
    common in everything but pure road bikes these days) make sure they can
    be locked out or adjusted for someone of your weight. Another reason to
    stick with a bike shop.

    I tend to not think about suspension because I have none on any of my
    own bikes, and wouldn't consider it unless I were actually to
    contemplate riding off-road.

    RichC

  13. "rdclark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I tend to not think about suspension because I have none on any of my
    own bikes, and wouldn't consider it unless I were actually to
    contemplate riding off-road.

    Very good points.

    Not that you're considering one, but I should point out many "small wheel"
    folding bikes have suspension to help give them a ride feel more like a full
    size bike. (Brompton, KHS, Birdy ... most of them really 🙂

    I'm 255lbs and can bottom out the suspension on my KHS 20" wheel folder but
    my goal weight is 185ish where I think It'll be fine - so it's more of a
    bike to grow (or shrink) in to.

    We now return to your regularly scheduled thread... 😉

    C.j

  14. C.J.Patten said:


    "Chalo" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    (They'd better be strong if you ride a recumbent, because you have to
    go over bumps like a sack of potatoes, without being able to "post" up
    off the saddle.)

    Folding "wedgie" FWIW.
    http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html

    Full suspension and all. Those wheels should be pretty darn durable
    then. Keep enough air in the tires (so they don't get flat-spotted)
    and they'll probably last until you grind away the sidewalls or wear
    out the hubs.

    Chalo Colina

  15. First of all, I'd like to thank all you folks for your input, I appreciate
    it.

    I'm currently looking at a road bike with a stand-over height of 34.5". I
    may stand corrected, but doesn't the manufacturer of a bike that is
    obviously designed to fit a large rider assume that this rider is probably
    heavier than the average person and "beef" up the bike accordingly? I don't
    know, just asking.

    "C.J.Patten" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "rdclark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I tend to not think about suspension because I have none on any of my
    own bikes, and wouldn't consider it unless I were actually to
    contemplate riding off-road.

    Very good points.

    Not that you're considering one, but I should point out many "small wheel"
    folding bikes have suspension to help give them a ride feel more like a


    full

    Quoted message said:

    size bike. (Brompton, KHS, Birdy ... most of them really 🙂

    I'm 255lbs and can bottom out the suspension on my KHS 20" wheel folder


    but

    Quoted message said:

    my goal weight is 185ish where I think It'll be fine - so it's more of a
    bike to grow (or shrink) in to.

    We now return to your regularly scheduled thread... 😉

    C.j

  16. C.J.Patten said:

    http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html

    Did the big rack interfer with the folding process (it appears in photo
    one but is replaced by a fender and seatpost rack in the rest)?

  17. Hey Rich!

    Here's a link to the "current" configuration of the bike:
    http://ca.geocities.com/af895/Westwood_side.jpg
    (If the link doesn't work, try again later - Geocities has some questionable
    bandwidth limiting function)

    I was fortunate with the rack (if the photo doesn't show, it's the one
    attached to braze-ons, not the seatpost rack).
    It's slim enough and the rear triangle tapers vertically enough it doesn't
    interfere with the fold.

    I got rid of the seat post rack because it didn't have any side support and
    wasn't going to support the weight I wanted to carry.

    Cheers,
    Chris

    "Rich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    C.J.Patten said:

    http://www.ncf.ca/~af895/bike/KHS.html

    Did the big rack interfer with the folding process (it appears in photo
    one but is replaced by a fender and seatpost rack in the rest)?

  18. Sidewinder wrote:
    :: First of all, I'd like to thank all you folks for your input, I
    :: appreciate it.
    ::
    :: I'm currently looking at a road bike with a stand-over height of
    :: 34.5". I may stand corrected, but doesn't the manufacturer of a
    :: bike that is obviously designed to fit a large rider assume that
    :: this rider is probably heavier than the average person and "beef" up
    :: the bike accordingly? I don't know, just asking.

    Make sure you get good wheels. The frame should be fine. Some bikes come
    with machine-made racing type wheels that won't stand up to your weight if
    you start doing significant riding. The spokes will break/pop loose causing
    the wheel to go out of true. Personally, I suggest you get hand-made wheels
    (32 oto 36 spoke) from a wheelbuilder.

    ::
    ::
    ::
    ::
    :: "C.J.Patten" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :: news:[email hidden]...
    :::
    ::: "rdclark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    ::: news:[email hidden]...
    :::
    :::: I tend to not think about suspension because I have none on any of
    :::: my own bikes, and wouldn't consider it unless I were actually to
    :::: contemplate riding off-road.
    :::
    ::: Very good points.
    :::
    ::: Not that you're considering one, but I should point out many "small
    ::: wheel" folding bikes have suspension to help give them a ride feel
    ::: more like a full size bike. (Brompton, KHS, Birdy ... most of them
    ::: really 🙂
    :::
    ::: I'm 255lbs and can bottom out the suspension on my KHS 20" wheel
    ::: folder but my goal weight is 185ish where I think It'll be fine -
    ::: so it's more of a bike to grow (or shrink) in to.
    :::
    ::: We now return to your regularly scheduled thread... 😉
    :::
    ::: C.j

  19. On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:04:34 -0400, "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Sidewinder wrote:
    :: First of all, I'd like to thank all you folks for your input, I
    :: appreciate it.
    ::
    :: I'm currently looking at a road bike with a stand-over height of
    :: 34.5". I may stand corrected, but doesn't the manufacturer of a
    :: bike that is obviously designed to fit a large rider assume that
    :: this rider is probably heavier than the average person and "beef" up
    :: the bike accordingly? I don't know, just asking.

    Make sure you get good wheels. The frame should be fine. Some bikes come
    with machine-made racing type wheels that won't stand up to your weight if
    you start doing significant riding. The spokes will break/pop loose causing
    the wheel to go out of true. Personally, I suggest you get hand-made wheels
    (32 oto 36 spoke) from a wheelbuilder.

    Just another viewpoint. I've ridden both Bontrager race-light wheels with
    the reduced spoke count and standard Bontrager wheels at a weight of
    225-230lbs and have not been gentle with the bike. Never had a bit of
    problem with spokes breaking. So ymmv. ;-)

    jj

  20. Sidewinder said:

    First of all, I'd like to thank all you folks for your input, I appreciate
    it.

    I'm currently looking at a road bike with a stand-over height of 34.5". I
    may stand corrected, but doesn't the manufacturer of a bike that is
    obviously designed to fit a large rider assume that this rider is probably
    heavier than the average person and "beef" up the bike accordingly? I don't
    know, just asking.

    No, not usually. Bike components are not changed for larger size bikes
    of the same model. Most frames are not re-engineered either, since the
    tubing diameter and wall thickness are pretty much standard. The net of
    this is that larger frames aren't stronger, and may in fact be too
    flexible. A large rider should pick a type of bike that's more suitable.
    Bikes not built specifically to be light (racers) are generally better
    candidates. These can include bikes like hybrids at lower prices and
    tourers at higher. I've heard the opinion that "bikes should weight 12%
    of your body weight". I don't know about absolutes, but I think the
    claim has merit in that larger riders should expect to be riding a
    proportionally stronger (hence heavier) bike.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.