Road Cycling · Public discussion

Every Second Counts

Started by Stewart Fleming · · Last activity · 16 posts · 630 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
7 July 2005
Last activity
9 July 2005
Original author
Stewart Fleming
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
630
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hmmmm...
    " Although Maillot Jaune Lance Armstrong (Discovery Channel) lost 0'19
    today to Vino (0'07 gap at finish + 0'12 time bonus), when asked about
    the loss of time to the Kazakh post stage, Armstrong shrugged, like it
    was no big deal. Discovery Channel manager Johan Bruyneel told
    Cyclingnews post stage that Lance didn't see Vino attack in the finale,
    but did say the time loss was "nothing serious."
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/?id=results/tour056

    Wonder what was said on the bus (what goes on the bus stays on the bus),
    but I don't think we'll see a repeat of that...

  2. At this stage giving up 19 seconds is suboptimal, but do you really think
    Armstrong thinks he is going to need those 19 seconds to beat Vino?
    If was worried, it would be a sure sign he is concerned about this form...

    Stewart Fleming said:

    Hmmmm...
    " Although Maillot Jaune Lance Armstrong (Discovery Channel) lost 0'19
    today to Vino (0'07 gap at finish + 0'12 time bonus), when asked about
    the loss of time to the Kazakh post stage, Armstrong shrugged, like it
    was no big deal. Discovery Channel manager Johan Bruyneel told
    Cyclingnews post stage that Lance didn't see Vino attack in the finale,
    but did say the time loss was "nothing serious."
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/?id=results/tour056

    Wonder what was said on the bus (what goes on the bus stays on the bus),
    but I don't think we'll see a repeat of that...

  3. Stewart Fleming said:

    Hmmmm...
    " Although Maillot Jaune Lance Armstrong (Discovery Channel) lost 0'19
    today to Vino (0'07 gap at finish + 0'12 time bonus), when asked about
    the loss of time to the Kazakh post stage, Armstrong shrugged, like it
    was no big deal. Discovery Channel manager Johan Bruyneel told
    Cyclingnews post stage that Lance didn't see Vino attack in the finale,
    but did say the time loss was "nothing serious."
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2005/tour05/?id=results/tour056

    Wonder what was said on the bus (what goes on the bus stays on the bus),
    but I don't think we'll see a repeat of that...

    Damn! I love Vino!

    Time for Ullrich and Kloden to put aside their own unattainable
    ambitions and give their all for the only one on the team that's got it
    in him to WIN.

  4. Stewart Fleming said:


    Wonder what was said on the bus (what goes on the bus stays on the bus),

    Thanks for the disquieting visual (cue the picture of George)

  5. Tim Lines said:

    Damn! I love Vino!

    Time for Ullrich and Kloden to put aside their own unattainable
    ambitions and give their all for the only one on the team that's got it
    in him to WIN.

    has everyone lost their minds ?

    i like vino's style too, it's good for stage and classic wins.

    but since when has picking up some spare change seconds on a flat stage
    been considered the sign of launching a serious challenge for the tour ?

  6. amit said:

    has everyone lost their minds ?

    i like vino's style too, it's good for stage and classic wins.

    but since when has picking up some spare change seconds on a flat stage
    been considered the sign of launching a serious challenge for the tour ?

    Dumbass -

    Ever since the "I pay attention to cycling once a year" Fatties started
    posting to rbr in July.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  7. Sir Topham Hatt said:

    At this stage giving up 19 seconds is suboptimal, but do you really think
    Armstrong thinks he is going to need those 19 seconds to beat Vino?
    If was worried, it would be a sure sign he is concerned about this form...

    When Lance makes an excuse, there's something that he's not happy about.
    Form would be the least of it. I'm not convinced that his bunch
    instints are as sharp as they were. He went back 30-40 places between
    Vino's jump and the crash (700m), while Ullrich made it up and round.

  8. Carl Sundquist said:


    Stewart Fleming said:

    Wonder what was said on the bus (what goes on the bus stays on the bus),

    Thanks for the disquieting visual (cue the picture of George)

    It was more the group sex thing with Sheryl that I was thinking of
    http://www.dailypeloton.com/displayarticle.asp?pk=6498

  9. Kurgan Gringioni said:
    amit said:

    but since when has picking up some spare change seconds on a flat stage
    been considered the sign of launching a serious challenge for the tour ?

    Quoted message said:

    Ever since the "I pay attention to cycling once a year" Fatties started
    posting to rbr in July.

    Alex,
    I started the thread. My point isn't strictly about the time bonus;
    it's about actions and words.

  10. since taking 19" in a flat stage with a mayhem at the finish costs less
    effort than doing it in the mountains. He won't be more tired than any
    other flat and got 19" bonus, what else do you want more?

    Kenny

  11. Kenny said:

    since taking 19" in a flat stage with a mayhem at the finish costs less
    effort than doing it in the mountains. He won't be more tired than any
    other flat and got 19" bonus, what else do you want more?

    that's not MY point. 19 secs may be important in the end.

    my point is that vino's accomplishment today doesn't say anything about
    how he will fare on GC, or suggest that he should be T-mobile's leader
    (as the OP suggests).

  12. Agreed, it does not saw where he will end. But it's clear wat his
    ambition is. And his ambition is bigger that Ullrich's. He realizes
    taking time back in the mountains will be hard. This was much easier
    and apparently he takes any opportunity. He does what ullrich says.

    Kenny

  13. amit said:


    Tim Lines said:

    Damn! I love Vino!

    Time for Ullrich and Kloden to put aside their own unattainable
    ambitions and give their all for the only one on the team that's got it
    in him to WIN.

    has everyone lost their minds ?

    i like vino's style too, it's good for stage and classic wins.

    but since when has picking up some spare change seconds on a flat stage
    been considered the sign of launching a serious challenge for the tour ?

    I'm just having fun with it. It was a good finish to the stage. It
    remains to be seen who will mount a challenge since they haven't even
    hit the mountains yet.

    OTOH, I do think Vino is a more interesting challenger than Ullrich.

  14. Carl Sundquist said:
    Stewart Fleming said:


    Wonder what was said on the bus (what goes on the bus stays on the bus),

    Thanks for the disquieting visual (cue the picture of George)

    A google image search for HINCAPIE GAY yields one result (a google
    whack!):

    http://hincapie.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_hincapie_archive.html

    -RJ

  15. Which explains why Ullrich is going for another second.

    -ilan

  16. Stewart Fleming said:
    Sir Topham Hatt said:

    At this stage giving up 19 seconds is suboptimal, but do you really think
    Armstrong thinks he is going to need those 19 seconds to beat Vino?
    If was worried, it would be a sure sign he is concerned about this form...

    When Lance makes an excuse, there's something that he's not happy about.
    Form would be the least of it. I'm not convinced that his bunch
    instints are as sharp as they were. He went back 30-40 places between
    Vino's jump and the crash (700m), while Ullrich made it up and round.

    Going slower and having the same time sounds like pretty good instincts to me.

    Ron

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.