General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Vicious attacks

Started by hotmoon · · Last activity · 37 posts · 975 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 October 2003
Last activity
11 November 2003
Original author
hotmoon
Posts
37
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
975
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 37
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

  2. "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such as
    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

  3. "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such


    as

    Quoted message said:

    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for themselves?
    Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Dave said:


    "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people
    such as jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for themselves?

    People can think for themselves, but they need to have information
    before they can do any thinking, and digging out the information can
    be hard. The uninformed, for example, might believe the steady stream
    of lies emitted by the likes of you. So, countering such things is
    important.

    Quoted message said:

    Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?

    You're pretty intolerant for a guy whose only interest in life is
    selling overpriced ginseng.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  5. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
    From: "Dave" [email hidden]
    Date: 10/12/2003 7:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for themselves?
    Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?

    one must have accurate info to make decisions..

    from someone with NO understanding of human physiology..who makes comments like
    "stop the Warfarin,,,the ginseng is also a blood thinner"...

    I find you not only despicable...but dangerous...

    and practicising medicine without a license...

    "narrow a perspective"....lol lol....this from a dummy who insists efficacy can
    be determined by an independent lab..

    hawki

  6. "Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such


    as

    Quoted message said:

    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for


    themselves?

    At one point in my life, I thoguth that people could think for themselves.
    Then, Ilearned about alternative4 medicine, met Jan Drew, Debbee, MedStools,
    YOU, etc. and learned how wrong I have been. You have been very educational
    in this regard.

    Quoted message said:

    Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?

    No, of course not. I know that Peter B., Peter M. Orac, etc. etc. have very
    open minds and that they can consider new ideas quite easily.

    Sadly, there are those, such as yourself, Jan Drew, et al, who do not have
    the ability. Work on it.

    BTW, thanks for asking.

  7. "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such


    as

    Quoted message said:

    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    who takes them seriously? ditto for you and me.

  8. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
    From: "stuart" [email hidden]
    Date: 10/13/2003 1:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <MnEib.14120$Pe5.13912@edtnps84>

    "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    > them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    > even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    > opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    > convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    > down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    > If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    > them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people


    such

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    as

    Quoted message said:

    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    who takes them seriously? ditto for you and me.

    Mark spreads more erroneous information.

    Mark has a problem.

    http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/propagandistprobert.html

    I have helped others and will continue.

    Leadeth not down unrighteous paths.

  9. (Jan) said:

    I have helped others and will continue.

    Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
    your life and the life of your children.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA

    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amapolis.htm

  10. "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such as
    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    Typical reaction by the medical/pharma cartel stooges - they get
    everything around the wrong way in order to confuse the issue and push
    their agenda.

    Carole
    http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/health.htm

  11. Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    (Jan) said:

    I have helped others and will continue.

    Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
    your life and the life of your children.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers

    Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
    Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
    refer to her as "he".

    Carole
    http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/health.htm

  12. "Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in


    message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
    them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
    even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
    opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
    convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
    down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
    If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
    them.

    thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such


    as

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.

    Typical reaction by the medical/pharma cartel stooges - they get
    everything around the wrong way in order to confuse the issue and push
    their agenda.

    Carole, you got that 180 degrees sdrawkcab.

  13. On 14 Oct 2003 08:59:58 -0700, [email hidden] (Carole)

    Quoted message said:

    I might be tempted to think you knew something about
    Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
    refer to her as "he".

    In the FAQ I explain the backgrounds.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA

    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amapolis.htm

  14. Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
    From: [email hidden] (Carole)
    Date: 10/14/2003 7:59 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    (Jan) said:

    I have helped others and will continue.

    Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
    your life and the life of your children.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers

    Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
    Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
    refer to her as "he".

    Carole
    http://www.austarmetro.com.au/~hubbca/health.htm

    The man has a screw loose.

    He has been told over and over.

    He is to be pitied.

    Jan

  15. "Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    (Jan) said:

    I have helped others and will continue.

    Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
    your life and the life of your children.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers

    Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
    Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
    refer to her as "he".

    Jan's habit of copying and pasting from other people's work
    without attribution is her problem. It would only be natural
    that someone new to the scene would assume that she's a "he"
    when she uses their words in her posts.

  16. Nana Weedkiller said:


    "Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On 13 Oct 2003 21:28:49 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:

    >I have helped others and will continue.

    Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
    your life and the life of your children.

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers

    Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
    Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
    refer to her as "he".

    Jan's habit of copying and pasting from other people's work
    without attribution is her problem. It would only be natural
    that someone new to the scene would assume that she's a "he"
    when she uses their words in her posts.

    Aribert is not a native English speaker, and where he comes from "Jan"
    is a man's name.

    What really knots Jan's shorts about Aribert is that he is opposed to
    amalgam but won't go along with her lies and fearmongering.

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  17. (Jan) said:

    It is a fact that Aribert Deckers is a vicious attacker.

    Well, I am known for being a very tough guy... ;O)

    Which reminds me of a FAQ about Jan Drew. Jan Drew is a notorious liar
    and promotor for many quackeries and for charlatanism. Jan Drew
    advertizes for Mercola and other charlatans, who rip off poor ill
    people.

    Jan Drew even persuades parents not to have their children vaccinated.
    Vaccination saves lifes. Following the persuada of Jan Drew the
    parents would kill their children. So, Jan Drew's lies kill children.

    Jan Drew, who persuades parents to kill their children, calls me a
    "vicious attacker". Well, I think that ALL people must prevent
    criminals from killing children, and that this prevention must use as
    much force as neccessary. The force I use depends on the force the
    quacks, charlatans and the child-killers use. If they would give up
    their criminal deeds, there would be no reason for applying strong
    force. But as the quacks, charlatans and child-killers use strong
    force, they must be stopped down with all ammunition available. With
    all...

    I wonder, why Jan Drew and his accomplices never think about what a
    father would do the moment the father realizes that Jan Drew and the
    like are responsible for the death of his child... In the USA the arms
    laws are much less strict than in Germany. But one does not need a
    rifle to break a neck.

    "An eye for an eye." The child-killers should never forget that !

    Regards,

    Aribert Deckers
    --
    POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA

    http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amapolis.htm

  18. "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    He has been old over and over I am not male, so your point is mute.

    Chuckle.

  19. (Jan) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 10/16/2003 2:49 AM Pacific Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    "Nana Weedkiller" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Is Ted Nidiffer, lackey for Barrett. Despicable liar.

    It is a fact that Aribert Deckers is a vicious attacker.

    Making excuses for him just shows the character of both Ted and Peter.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...
    > > On 13 Oct 2003 21:28:49 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
    > >
    > > >I have helped others and will continue.
    > >
    > > Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
    > > your life and the life of your children.
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Aribert Deckers
    >
    > Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
    > Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
    > refer to her as "he".

    Jan's habit of copying and pasting from other people's work
    without attribution is her problem. It would only be natural
    that someone new to the scene would assume that she's a "he"
    when she uses their words in her posts.

    Aribert is not a native English speaker, and where he comes from "Jan"
    is a man's name.

    He has been old over and over I am not male, so your point is mute.

    The word is "moot", although the number of times things have to v=be
    said around here sometimes makes me feel mute. I am one of the people
    who has told him, in a private about another matter.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What really knots Jan's shorts about Aribert is that he is opposed to
    amalgam but won't go along with her lies and fearmongering.

    Wrong again.

    He is about on the level as Mr. O'Neil.

    He is nothing like Wild Bill. For a start, Aribert's non-native use of
    English is better than Mr O'Neill's abilities with the language he
    grew up with. But this thread is not about Mr O'Neill, despite the
    title. Aribert may be annoying, but his level of abuse is nothing like
    O'Neill's. His OCD is a worry, but I have lived with someone with OCD
    for many years, so perhaps I don't care as much as others might.

    Quoted message said:

    You just have resentments because you know you lied and I proved it.

    Is that a Ka-ching I hear faintly echoing?

    Quoted message said:

    I never condoned Mr. O'Neil posts, but you don't have the character to do the
    same.

    I am not sure I understand that last sentence.

    Quoted message said:

    I have told no lies and certainly no fearmongering.

    My message starts with *IF*.

    *IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!

    And Aribert agrees with you. Up to a point.

    <snip repetition>

    --
    Peter Bowditch
    The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
    The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
    and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
    To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

  20. Quoted message said:

    From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
    Date: 10/17/2003 10:47 AM Central Standard Time
    Message-id: <[email hidden]>

    Because you are covered in suppurating sores and smell like a week-old
    corpse?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.