The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Vicious attacks
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 11 October 2003
- Last activity
- 11 November 2003
- Original author
- hotmoon
- Posts
- 37
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 975
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such as
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to. -
"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such
asQuoted message said:
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.
Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for themselves?
Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you? -
In article <[email hidden]>,
Dave said:
"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people
such as jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for themselves?
People can think for themselves, but they need to have information
before they can do any thinking, and digging out the information can
be hard. The uninformed, for example, might believe the steady stream
of lies emitted by the likes of you. So, countering such things is
important.Quoted message said:
Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?
You're pretty intolerant for a guy whose only interest in life is
selling overpriced ginseng.-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT) -
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
From: "Dave" [email hidden]
Date: 10/12/2003 7:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Quoted message said:
Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for themselves?
Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?one must have accurate info to make decisions..
from someone with NO understanding of human physiology..who makes comments like
"stop the Warfarin,,,the ginseng is also a blood thinner"...I find you not only despicable...but dangerous...
and practicising medicine without a license...
"narrow a perspective"....lol lol....this from a dummy who insists efficacy can
be determined by an independent lab..hawki
-
"Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in
messageQuoted message said:
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such
asQuoted message said:
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.
Why do you think that? Do you assume that people can't think for
themselves?At one point in my life, I thoguth that people could think for themselves.
Then, Ilearned about alternative4 medicine, met Jan Drew, Debbee, MedStools,
YOU, etc. and learned how wrong I have been. You have been very educational
in this regard.Quoted message said:
Do you assume that everyone here has as narrow a perspective as you?
No, of course not. I know that Peter B., Peter M. Orac, etc. etc. have very
open minds and that they can consider new ideas quite easily.Sadly, there are those, such as yourself, Jan Drew, et al, who do not have
the ability. Work on it.BTW, thanks for asking.
-
"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such
asQuoted message said:
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.
who takes them seriously? ditto for you and me.
-
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
From: "stuart" [email hidden]
Date: 10/13/2003 1:00 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <MnEib.14120$Pe5.13912@edtnps84>"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in
messageQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
> them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
> even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
> opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
> convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
> down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
> If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
> them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people
suchQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
as
Quoted message said:
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.
who takes them seriously? ditto for you and me.
Mark spreads more erroneous information.
Mark has a problem.
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/propagandistprobert.html
I have helped others and will continue.
Leadeth not down unrighteous paths.
-
(Jan) said:
I have helped others and will continue.
Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
your life and the life of your children.Regards,
Aribert Deckers
--
POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA -
"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such as
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.Typical reaction by the medical/pharma cartel stooges - they get
everything around the wrong way in order to confuse the issue and push
their agenda. -
Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
(Jan) said:
I have helped others and will continue.
Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
your life and the life of your children.Regards,
Aribert Deckers
Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
refer to her as "he". -
"Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
"Markositiu Probertositiu" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"hotmoon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
The "opposition" will often attack you viciously. Don't respond to
them. "They" will attack your character. If it bothers you, don't
even read their posts. Safe yourself a lot of grief. State your
opinions and facts and don't read their posts. You are not going to
convince the vicious ones of anything. Help keep your blood pressure
down. It is unhealthy to get involved in fights with vicious people.
If they cannot be civil, don't read their posts and don't respond to
them.thanks for the advice, but erroneous information provided by people such
asQuoted message said:
Quoted message said:
jan Drew, MedStools, et al, must be responded to.
Typical reaction by the medical/pharma cartel stooges - they get
everything around the wrong way in order to confuse the issue and push
their agenda.Carole, you got that 180 degrees sdrawkcab.
-
On 14 Oct 2003 08:59:58 -0700, [email hidden] (Carole)
Quoted message said:
I might be tempted to think you knew something about
Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
refer to her as "he".In the FAQ I explain the backgrounds.
Regards,
Aribert Deckers
--
POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA -
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
From: [email hidden] (Carole)
Date: 10/14/2003 7:59 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
(Jan) said:
I have helped others and will continue.
Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
your life and the life of your children.Regards,
Aribert Deckers
Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
refer to her as "he".The man has a screw loose.
He has been told over and over.
He is to be pitied.
Jan
-
"Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
(Jan) said:
I have helped others and will continue.
Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
your life and the life of your children.Regards,
Aribert Deckers
Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
refer to her as "he".Jan's habit of copying and pasting from other people's work
without attribution is her problem. It would only be natural
that someone new to the scene would assume that she's a "he"
when she uses their words in her posts. -
Nana Weedkiller said:
"Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
On 13 Oct 2003 21:28:49 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
>I have helped others and will continue.
Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
your life and the life of your children.Regards,
Aribert Deckers
Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
refer to her as "he".Jan's habit of copying and pasting from other people's work
without attribution is her problem. It would only be natural
that someone new to the scene would assume that she's a "he"
when she uses their words in her posts.Aribert is not a native English speaker, and where he comes from "Jan"
is a man's name.What really knots Jan's shorts about Aribert is that he is opposed to
amalgam but won't go along with her lies and fearmongering.--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com -
(Jan) said:
It is a fact that Aribert Deckers is a vicious attacker.
Well, I am known for being a very tough guy... ;O)
Which reminds me of a FAQ about Jan Drew. Jan Drew is a notorious liar
and promotor for many quackeries and for charlatanism. Jan Drew
advertizes for Mercola and other charlatans, who rip off poor ill
people.Jan Drew even persuades parents not to have their children vaccinated.
Vaccination saves lifes. Following the persuada of Jan Drew the
parents would kill their children. So, Jan Drew's lies kill children.Jan Drew, who persuades parents to kill their children, calls me a
"vicious attacker". Well, I think that ALL people must prevent
criminals from killing children, and that this prevention must use as
much force as neccessary. The force I use depends on the force the
quacks, charlatans and the child-killers use. If they would give up
their criminal deeds, there would be no reason for applying strong
force. But as the quacks, charlatans and child-killers use strong
force, they must be stopped down with all ammunition available. With
all...I wonder, why Jan Drew and his accomplices never think about what a
father would do the moment the father realizes that Jan Drew and the
like are responsible for the death of his child... In the USA the arms
laws are much less strict than in Germany. But one does not need a
rifle to break a neck."An eye for an eye." The child-killers should never forget that !
Regards,
Aribert Deckers
--
POLICE - POLIZEI - POLITIE - POLICIA -
"Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
He has been old over and over I am not male, so your point is mute.
Chuckle.
-
(Jan) said:
Quoted message said:
Subject: Re: Vicious attacks
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/16/2003 2:49 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>"Nana Weedkiller" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Is Ted Nidiffer, lackey for Barrett. Despicable liar.
It is a fact that Aribert Deckers is a vicious attacker.
Making excuses for him just shows the character of both Ted and Peter.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
"Carole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Happy Oyster <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...
> > On 13 Oct 2003 21:28:49 GMT, [email hidden] (Jan) wrote:
> >
> > >I have helped others and will continue.
> >
> > Jan Drew is a notorious liar. To believe what he says can endanger
> > your life and the life of your children.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Aribert Deckers
>
> Aw, you reckon? I might be tempted to think you knew something about
> Jan Drew but you couldn't have much understanding of her when you
> refer to her as "he".Jan's habit of copying and pasting from other people's work
without attribution is her problem. It would only be natural
that someone new to the scene would assume that she's a "he"
when she uses their words in her posts.Aribert is not a native English speaker, and where he comes from "Jan"
is a man's name.He has been old over and over I am not male, so your point is mute.
The word is "moot", although the number of times things have to v=be
said around here sometimes makes me feel mute. I am one of the people
who has told him, in a private about another matter.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
What really knots Jan's shorts about Aribert is that he is opposed to
amalgam but won't go along with her lies and fearmongering.Wrong again.
He is about on the level as Mr. O'Neil.
He is nothing like Wild Bill. For a start, Aribert's non-native use of
English is better than Mr O'Neill's abilities with the language he
grew up with. But this thread is not about Mr O'Neill, despite the
title. Aribert may be annoying, but his level of abuse is nothing like
O'Neill's. His OCD is a worry, but I have lived with someone with OCD
for many years, so perhaps I don't care as much as others might.Quoted message said:
You just have resentments because you know you lied and I proved it.
Is that a Ka-ching I hear faintly echoing?
Quoted message said:
I never condoned Mr. O'Neil posts, but you don't have the character to do the
same.I am not sure I understand that last sentence.
Quoted message said:
I have told no lies and certainly no fearmongering.
My message starts with *IF*.
*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
And Aribert agrees with you. Up to a point.
<snip repetition>
--
Peter Bowditch
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
The Green Light http://www.ratbags.com/greenlight
and The New Improved Quintessence of the Loon with added Vitamins and C-Q10 http://www.ratbags.com/loon
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com -
Quoted message said:
From: Peter Bowditch [email hidden]
Date: 10/17/2003 10:47 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>Because you are covered in suppurating sores and smell like a week-old
corpse?
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.