Dark Alley Dan said:Thank you, Doctor - appreciate the input.
The folks at MTB reviews sure seem to prefer the SRAM...
Anyone else?
Dan
A lot of people see Shimano as the Microsoft of bicycle componentry. I remember back when there were quite a few gripes when Shimano went from 8 speed to 9 speed for MTB components and there was a lot of talk about Shimano quite literally forcing people over to the new standards. Of course, much of this is unfounded as there is much more compatibility between the 8 & 9 speed grouppos in a real world sense than is let on by Shimano's press publications & web site. Besides, there is still plenty of NOS 8 speed equip still available. Any hack mechanic can take apart a 9 speed cassette and use 8 speed spacer rings to create an 8 speed cassette. I've done that to create a 7 speed cassette and there were no consequences in shifting whatsoever, so I tend to belive some of the compatibility issues are overrated.
Whether Shimano employ's monopolistic practices or not, there are many who are glad to have a choice for their MTB components. I am and I don't use SRAM. SRAM springs are reported to be much tighter and it is said that they shift more quickly under duress. Also, much of the MTB crowd is kind of anti-establishment (pony tails, goatee's, hemp shirts) and Shimano is a good target for them to vent. Shimano represents "the man." 🙄
Much of the newer SRAM trigger and twist shifters have a 1:1 cable pull ratio which makes them compatible with SRAM only for the rear and Shimano and SRAM compatible up front. There are some trigger (such as the Attack 9 speed) & twist shifters that have 2:1 cable pull ratio for full Shimano Compatibility.
Edit: There seems to be a similar kind of dissatisfaction being expressed about the newer integrated crank/BB spindle setup vs the older seperate Octalink cranksets and bottom brackets. It also happened when square taper was phased out. 😉 I'm sure there is a sizeable Octalink parts cache to keep everyone happy for a while.