responsibiity

John Forrest Tomlinson said:

from Leipheimer
at http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/jun05/jun11news

"Leipheimer said the crash was his own fault. 'I was riding hard and
carelessly,' he explained. 'I should have known better. I misjudged a
corner and hit the ground.'"

JT

****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

Pretty refreshing and cool to hear considering that it cost him the
lead. Gotta give him some serious credit since standard procedure is to
blame someone else. Both here and in Nascar.
Bill C

"John Forrest Tomlinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

from Leipheimer
at http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/jun05/jun11news

"Leipheimer said the crash was his own fault. 'I was riding hard and
carelessly,' he explained. 'I should have known better. I misjudged a
corner and hit the ground.'"

JT

I was please when I read that quote also. A simple, I messed up & it was my
fault. No equipment, teamate, competitor, or officials problem. It is sad
that it is so rare.

John Forrest Tomlinson said:

from Leipheimer
at http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/jun05/jun11news

"Leipheimer said the crash was his own fault. 'I was riding hard and
carelessly,' he explained. 'I should have known better. I misjudged a
corner and hit the ground.'"

He purposely threw himself on the ground hoping to benefit from the
adrenaline boost. LANCE, thinking quickly, neutralized the adrenaline
advantage by telling the peloton to wait.

Robert Chung said:

John Forrest Tomlinson said:

from Leipheimer
at http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/jun05/jun11news

"Leipheimer said the crash was his own fault. 'I was riding hard and
carelessly,' he explained. 'I should have known better. I misjudged a
corner and hit the ground.'"

He purposely threw himself on the ground hoping to benefit from the
adrenaline boost. LANCE, thinking quickly, neutralized the adrenaline
advantage by telling the peloton to wait.

Didn't we somehow conclude last year that purposely throwing oneself
down doesn't help? Though I don't remember the line of argument which
led to that conclusion.

Robert Chung said:

Quoted message said:

He purposely threw himself on the ground hoping to benefit from the
adrenaline boost. LANCE, thinking quickly, neutralized the adrenaline
advantage by telling the peloton to wait.

Ernst Noch said:

Didn't we somehow conclude last year that purposely throwing oneself
down doesn't help? Though I don't remember the line of argument which
led to that conclusion.

You mean rbr actually ever follows coherent lines of argument ?

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

Robert Chung said:

Quoted message said:

He purposely threw himself on the ground hoping to benefit from the
adrenaline boost. LANCE, thinking quickly, neutralized the adrenaline
advantage by telling the peloton to wait.

Ernst Noch said:

Didn't we somehow conclude last year that purposely throwing oneself
down doesn't help? Though I don't remember the line of argument which
led to that conclusion.

You mean rbr actually ever follows coherent lines of argument ?

Was there a Chung chart to go with the argument? It's not coherent
without a Chung chart.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

"He purposely threw himself on the ground hoping to benefit from the
adrenaline boost. LANCE, thinking quickly, neutralized the adrenaline
advantage by telling the peloton to wait. "

POST or REPLY of the month.
Bravo RC! LOL.

-Ken

Curtis L. Russell said:

Has any one considered that Chung could be a malevolent force
determined to corrupt rbr by misleading simple minds with complex
charts? Is there anyone left that would know if we're being duped?

(rubbing hands together in glee): Muu-ah-ha-ha-HA-HAAAA!

--
http://anonymous.coward.free.fr/temp/coalitiondeaths.png

In article <[email hidden]>,

Curtis L. Russell said:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:09:41 -0700, Ryan Cousineau <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Was there a Chung chart to go with the argument? It's not coherent
without a Chung chart.

Has any one considered that Chung could be a malevolent force
determined to corrupt rbr by misleading simple minds with complex
charts? Is there anyone left that would know if we're being duped?

Well, I've read my Tufte. I'm not always sure what he's graphing, but I
like the presentation!

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

Ryan Cousineau said:

Quoted message said:

Was there a Chung chart to go with the argument? It's not coherent
without a Chung chart.

Curtis L. Russell said:

Has any one considered that Chung could be a malevolent force
determined to corrupt rbr by misleading simple minds with complex
charts? Is there anyone left that would know if we're being duped?

Chung is Darth Vaders eviler chimera ?