New Update: http://rbrcritpro.blogspot.com/

Rik Van Diesel said:

I have officially changed the name...

Not to pull a Papai on you but why in your new blogspot do you state:

"...Crit Pro...and to keep the up with the latest guess as to who he
might be."

Does seem a bit hypoCRITical.

My personal opinion is that you're laying a trap for Crit Pro so you
can log his IP if he were to post.

GC

Quoted message said:

Rik Van Diesel said:

I have officially changed the name...

Not to pull a Papai on you but why in your new blogspot do you state:

"...Crit Pro...and to keep the up with the latest guess as to who he
might be."

Does seem a bit hypoCRITical.

My personal opinion is that you're laying a trap for Crit Pro so you
can log his IP if he were to post.

GC

Log IP address? First you would have to know how to do that. Secondly I
am over the crit pro thing. I like the last guess, but I realized it
was better to not know. The only reason I cared was I thought is was
one of my buddies, and if it is rob/ken then I dont really care.

RVD

PS You got to give me credit for outing pappy as a stalker.

Dude/Miss,

I am far from a stalker. 100% of the "stalking" you think I do is done
in public, on RBR.

I am not a dweeb who reads headers or tries an IP log trace. Most of
those are meaningless, as has been proven time and again.

I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and the
tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
accomplishment.

Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to say
or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and act
like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.

-Ken

k.papai said:

Dude/Miss,

I am far from a stalker. 100% of the "stalking" you think I do is

done

Quoted message said:

in public, on RBR.
I am not a dweeb who reads headers or tries an IP log trace. Most of
those are meaningless, as has been proven time and again.

Quoted message said:

-Ken

[email hidden] Feb 17, 10:01 pm show options

Not to pull a Papai on you but why in your new blogspot do you state:

Ken if that is you name,

Gorillacrit above used your name as a verb "Not to pull a Papai".

RVD

Whatever. Anything even *remotely* intellectual goes instantly over
your head.
People like you can never answer anything directly anwyay. You're WAY
too cool.

-Ken

MagillaGorilla said:

k.papai said:

Dude/Miss,

Quoted message said:

Magilla

It's like having Richard Ramirez tell everyone he leaves his window
open, and asking why everyone else doesn't.

RVD

Quoted message said:

k.papai wrote:
I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and

the

Quoted message said:

tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
accomplishment.

Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to

say

Quoted message said:

or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and

act

Quoted message said:

like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.

Alright Ken I'm going to lay it out for you. I know you're a smart guy
and a bike racing fan...and I agree with much of what you say. I get
what you're saying about "anonymous idiots taking potshots" as a large
amount of the posts here are pure speculation and innuendo with nothing
behind them.

With that said I'd like to take the time that Magilla did not and give
you the reasoning behind why some posters must remain anonymous. There
are several of us who are current / former USPROs. As such all of our
friends, family etc are deeply involved in the sport. Racing through
the junior ranks and graduating to the big leagues means you'll have
teammates, former teammates, coaches, soigneurs, mechanics, etc on
almost every single major team - even the Euro teams. Add to that
industry sponsors, journalists, photogs etc. You get the point. Our
whole lives are surrounded by the scene.

Most USPROs will never read or post here because they just don't care
and get enough of it in the daily routine. Other will simply lurk out
of curiosity / boredom. A few are active posters. Some with real
names and some with fake ones. Most of the stuff lately from the fake
name pros is doping related because that's the ugly underbelly that has
to be dealt with at every race. It's frustrating for the clean riders
because there is still a core group that is getting away with it. The
racers who have been around for awhile know the who's and why's.
Despite the hype, it really is easy to dope here and get away with it.

Problem is that it's all accusations and denials - so the clean guys
lose both ways: in many of the races (esp. the stage races) and in the
accusations. As has been said here many times, proof is hard to come
by. So most don't say anything. No one has video of dopers filling up
a vial of Eprex and injecting it into their stomachs.

So anonymity is the only way to get some of this out there. Loss of
anonymity means loss of leverage though. Being outed as a clean rider
making accusations means exposing ones self to the dopers who are
hiding behind their little secret - the dopers win again. It's really
all stacked in their favor. I'm not complaining, it's simply the way
it is at present.

Also (not that you did this but just as another observation) using
statements from retiring pros who say they "didn't see a problem with
doping" in the US as an argument doesn't hold much water. They have
nothing to gain by admitting there is a problem and everything to lose.

So all I ask is that you give some of the anonymous posters here some
benefit of the doubt. I think if you are a bit less dismissive of the
anonymity you'll begin to see who is for real and who isn't. Take this
for what it's worth but there are some serious insider truths here on
rbr.

-MC

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

k.papai wrote:
I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and

the

Quoted message said:

tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
accomplishment.

Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to

say

Quoted message said:

or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and

act

Quoted message said:

like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.

Alright Ken I'm going to lay it out for you. I know you're a smart

guy

Quoted message said:

and a bike racing fan...and I agree with much of what you say. I get
what you're saying about "anonymous idiots taking potshots" as a

large

Quoted message said:

amount of the posts here are pure speculation and innuendo with

nothing

Quoted message said:

behind them.

With that said I'd like to take the time that Magilla did not and

give

Quoted message said:

you the reasoning behind why some posters must remain anonymous.

There

Quoted message said:

are several of us who are current / former USPROs. As such all of

our

Quoted message said:

friends, family etc are deeply involved in the sport. Racing through
the junior ranks and graduating to the big leagues means you'll have
teammates, former teammates, coaches, soigneurs, mechanics, etc on
almost every single major team - even the Euro teams. Add to that
industry sponsors, journalists, photogs etc. You get the point. Our
whole lives are surrounded by the scene.

Most USPROs will never read or post here because they just don't care
and get enough of it in the daily routine. Other will simply lurk

out

Quoted message said:

of curiosity / boredom. A few are active posters. Some with real
names and some with fake ones. Most of the stuff lately from the

fake

Quoted message said:

name pros is doping related because that's the ugly underbelly that

has

Quoted message said:

to be dealt with at every race. It's frustrating for the clean

riders

Quoted message said:

because there is still a core group that is getting away with it.

The

Quoted message said:

racers who have been around for awhile know the who's and why's.
Despite the hype, it really is easy to dope here and get away with

it.

Quoted message said:

Problem is that it's all accusations and denials - so the clean guys
lose both ways: in many of the races (esp. the stage races) and in

the

Quoted message said:

accusations. As has been said here many times, proof is hard to come
by. So most don't say anything. No one has video of dopers filling

up

Quoted message said:

a vial of Eprex and injecting it into their stomachs.

So anonymity is the only way to get some of this out there. Loss of
anonymity means loss of leverage though. Being outed as a clean

rider

Quoted message said:

making accusations means exposing ones self to the dopers who are
hiding behind their little secret - the dopers win again. It's

really

Quoted message said:

all stacked in their favor. I'm not complaining, it's simply the way
it is at present.

Also (not that you did this but just as another observation) using
statements from retiring pros who say they "didn't see a problem with
doping" in the US as an argument doesn't hold much water. They have
nothing to gain by admitting there is a problem and everything to

lose.

Quoted message said:

So all I ask is that you give some of the anonymous posters here some
benefit of the doubt. I think if you are a bit less dismissive of

the

Quoted message said:

anonymity you'll begin to see who is for real and who isn't. Take

this

Quoted message said:

for what it's worth but there are some serious insider truths here on
rbr.

-MC

Amen. One of the only times I'll say, "I couldn't have said it better
myself."

USPRO Licensee aka: crit PRO

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

k.papai wrote:
I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and

the

Quoted message said:

tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
accomplishment.

Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to

say

Quoted message said:

or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and

act

Quoted message said:

like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.

Alright Ken I'm going to lay it out for you. I know you're a smart guy
and a bike racing fan...and I agree with much of what you say. I get
what you're saying about "anonymous idiots taking potshots" as a large
amount of the posts here are pure speculation and innuendo with nothing
behind them.

With that said I'd like to take the time that Magilla did not and give
you the reasoning behind why some posters must remain anonymous. There
are several of us who are current / former USPROs. As such all of our
friends, family etc are deeply involved in the sport. Racing through
the junior ranks and graduating to the big leagues means you'll have
teammates, former teammates, coaches, soigneurs, mechanics, etc on
almost every single major team - even the Euro teams. Add to that
industry sponsors, journalists, photogs etc. You get the point. Our
whole lives are surrounded by the scene.

Most USPROs will never read or post here because they just don't care
and get enough of it in the daily routine. Other will simply lurk out
of curiosity / boredom. A few are active posters. Some with real
names and some with fake ones. Most of the stuff lately from the fake
name pros is doping related because that's the ugly underbelly that has
to be dealt with at every race. It's frustrating for the clean riders
because there is still a core group that is getting away with it. The
racers who have been around for awhile know the who's and why's.
Despite the hype, it really is easy to dope here and get away with it.

Problem is that it's all accusations and denials - so the clean guys
lose both ways: in many of the races (esp. the stage races) and in the
accusations. As has been said here many times, proof is hard to come
by. So most don't say anything. No one has video of dopers filling up
a vial of Eprex and injecting it into their stomachs.

So anonymity is the only way to get some of this out there. Loss of
anonymity means loss of leverage though. Being outed as a clean rider
making accusations means exposing ones self to the dopers who are
hiding behind their little secret - the dopers win again. It's really
all stacked in their favor. I'm not complaining, it's simply the way
it is at present.

Also (not that you did this but just as another observation) using
statements from retiring pros who say they "didn't see a problem with
doping" in the US as an argument doesn't hold much water. They have
nothing to gain by admitting there is a problem and everything to lose.

So all I ask is that you give some of the anonymous posters here some
benefit of the doubt. I think if you are a bit less dismissive of the
anonymity you'll begin to see who is for real and who isn't. Take this
for what it's worth but there are some serious insider truths here on
rbr.

-MC

I hear what you're saying, but the anonymity is a sword that cuts both
ways. It may decrease the risk of putting this stuff "out there" but
also decreases its credibility.
Considering the amount of verifyable [censored] out there, how is someone NOT
on the inside supposed to judge all the allegations? And from what
you're saying, the folks on the inside know all of this anyway.
If you're saying it's just a frustrated primal scream, I can understand
it. But who in any position to do anything about this cares what is
written in rbr anyhow?

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

"Mark & Steven Bornfeld" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:dbIRd.22704$sR5.6026@trndny05...
, I can understand

Quoted message said:

it. But who in any position to do anything about this cares what is
written in rbr anyhow?

Steve

Ullrich does. He's still hurting from all of the fat jokes.

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

k.papai wrote:
I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and

the

Quoted message said:

tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
accomplishment.

Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to

say

Quoted message said:

or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and

act

Quoted message said:

like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.

Alright Ken I'm going to lay it out for you. I know you're a smart guy
and a bike racing fan...and I agree with much of what you say. I get
what you're saying about "anonymous idiots taking potshots" as a large
amount of the posts here are pure speculation and innuendo with nothing
behind them.

With that said I'd like to take the time that Magilla did not and give
you the reasoning behind why some posters must remain anonymous. There
are several of us who are current / former USPROs. As such all of our
friends, family etc are deeply involved in the sport. Racing through
the junior ranks and graduating to the big leagues means you'll have
teammates, former teammates, coaches, soigneurs, mechanics, etc on
almost every single major team - even the Euro teams. Add to that
industry sponsors, journalists, photogs etc. You get the point. Our
whole lives are surrounded by the scene.

Most USPROs will never read or post here because they just don't care
and get enough of it in the daily routine. Other will simply lurk out
of curiosity / boredom. A few are active posters. Some with real
names and some with fake ones. Most of the stuff lately from the fake
name pros is doping related because that's the ugly underbelly that has
to be dealt with at every race. It's frustrating for the clean riders
because there is still a core group that is getting away with it. The
racers who have been around for awhile know the who's and why's.
Despite the hype, it really is easy to dope here and get away with it.

Problem is that it's all accusations and denials - so the clean guys
lose both ways: in many of the races (esp. the stage races) and in the
accusations. As has been said here many times, proof is hard to come
by. So most don't say anything. No one has video of dopers filling up
a vial of Eprex and injecting it into their stomachs.

So anonymity is the only way to get some of this out there. Loss of
anonymity means loss of leverage though. Being outed as a clean rider
making accusations means exposing ones self to the dopers who are
hiding behind their little secret - the dopers win again. It's really
all stacked in their favor. I'm not complaining, it's simply the way
it is at present.

Also (not that you did this but just as another observation) using
statements from retiring pros who say they "didn't see a problem with
doping" in the US as an argument doesn't hold much water. They have
nothing to gain by admitting there is a problem and everything to lose.

So all I ask is that you give some of the anonymous posters here some
benefit of the doubt. I think if you are a bit less dismissive of the
anonymity you'll begin to see who is for real and who isn't. Take this
for what it's worth but there are some serious insider truths here on
rbr.

-MC

I hear what you're saying, but the anonymity is a sword that cuts
both ways. It may decrease the risk of putting this stuff "out there"
but also decreases its credibility.
Considering the amount of verifyable [censored] out there, how is someone
NOT on the inside supposed to judge all the allegations? And from what
you're saying, the folks on the inside know all of this anyway.
If you're saying it's just a frustrated primal scream, I can
understand it. But who in any position to do anything about this cares
what is written in rbr anyhow?

Steve

Good question. Because the people who know stuff say very specific
things. And you need to use your Jedi powers to guide you into figuring
out who is the real McDeal vs. the DARK SIDE pretenders.

According to your logic, Deep Throat's anonymity means Woodward and
Bernstein should return their Pulitzers.

I have a question for you dental twin, and I'd like you to really level
with me. Did you and bro ever pull a Dead Ringers on a hot chick patient?

It's a legitimate question.

Bananas to you,

Magilla

MagillaGorilla said:

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

Quoted message said:

> k.papai wrote:
> I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
> graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and

the

> tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
> accomplishment.
>
> Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to

say

> or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and

act

> like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.
>

Alright Ken I'm going to lay it out for you. I know you're a smart guy
and a bike racing fan...and I agree with much of what you say. I get
what you're saying about "anonymous idiots taking potshots" as a large
amount of the posts here are pure speculation and innuendo with nothing
behind them.

With that said I'd like to take the time that Magilla did not and give
you the reasoning behind why some posters must remain anonymous. There
are several of us who are current / former USPROs. As such all of our
friends, family etc are deeply involved in the sport. Racing through
the junior ranks and graduating to the big leagues means you'll have
teammates, former teammates, coaches, soigneurs, mechanics, etc on
almost every single major team - even the Euro teams. Add to that
industry sponsors, journalists, photogs etc. You get the point. Our
whole lives are surrounded by the scene.

Most USPROs will never read or post here because they just don't care
and get enough of it in the daily routine. Other will simply lurk out
of curiosity / boredom. A few are active posters. Some with real
names and some with fake ones. Most of the stuff lately from the fake
name pros is doping related because that's the ugly underbelly that has
to be dealt with at every race. It's frustrating for the clean riders
because there is still a core group that is getting away with it. The
racers who have been around for awhile know the who's and why's.
Despite the hype, it really is easy to dope here and get away with it.

Problem is that it's all accusations and denials - so the clean guys
lose both ways: in many of the races (esp. the stage races) and in the
accusations. As has been said here many times, proof is hard to come
by. So most don't say anything. No one has video of dopers filling up
a vial of Eprex and injecting it into their stomachs.

So anonymity is the only way to get some of this out there. Loss of
anonymity means loss of leverage though. Being outed as a clean rider
making accusations means exposing ones self to the dopers who are
hiding behind their little secret - the dopers win again. It's really
all stacked in their favor. I'm not complaining, it's simply the way
it is at present.

Also (not that you did this but just as another observation) using
statements from retiring pros who say they "didn't see a problem with
doping" in the US as an argument doesn't hold much water. They have
nothing to gain by admitting there is a problem and everything to lose.

So all I ask is that you give some of the anonymous posters here some
benefit of the doubt. I think if you are a bit less dismissive of the
anonymity you'll begin to see who is for real and who isn't. Take this
for what it's worth but there are some serious insider truths here on
rbr.

-MC

I hear what you're saying, but the anonymity is a sword that cuts
both ways. It may decrease the risk of putting this stuff "out there"
but also decreases its credibility.
Considering the amount of verifyable [censored] out there, how is
someone NOT on the inside supposed to judge all the allegations? And
from what you're saying, the folks on the inside know all of this anyway.
If you're saying it's just a frustrated primal scream, I can
understand it. But who in any position to do anything about this
cares what is written in rbr anyhow?

Steve

Good question. Because the people who know stuff say very specific
things. And you need to use your Jedi powers to guide you into figuring
out who is the real McDeal vs. the DARK SIDE pretenders.

According to your logic, Deep Throat's anonymity means Woodward and
Bernstein should return their Pulitzers.

I have a question for you dental twin, and I'd like you to really level
with me. Did you and bro ever pull a Dead Ringers on a hot chick patient?

It's a legitimate question.

Bananas to you,

Magilla

Semi-serious answer--I never saw the movie, so I don't know, but I
doubt it.
However, we do re-enact the interrogation scene with Olivier and Dustin
Hoffman from "Marathon Man" every now and then.

It's very safe,
Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

MagillaGorilla said:

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

[email hidden] wrote:

>> k.papai wrote:
>> I am just against anonymous idiots taking potshots. it's liek gang
>> graffiti sprawled on cityscapes. All it does is ugly things up and
>
>
>
>
> the
>
>> tagger can hide and whimper in their own juvenile sense of
>> accomplishment.
>>
>> Posting constantly behind a handle means you really have nothing to
>
>
>
>
> say
>
>> or add and make [censored] up up about whomever or whatever. Grow up and
>
>
>
>
> act
>
>> like a man. Otherwise you can't take it.
>>
>
>
> Alright Ken I'm going to lay it out for you. I know you're a smart guy
> and a bike racing fan...and I agree with much of what you say. I get
> what you're saying about "anonymous idiots taking potshots" as a large
> amount of the posts here are pure speculation and innuendo with nothing
> behind them.
>
> With that said I'd like to take the time that Magilla did not and give
> you the reasoning behind why some posters must remain anonymous. There
> are several of us who are current / former USPROs. As such all of our
> friends, family etc are deeply involved in the sport. Racing through
> the junior ranks and graduating to the big leagues means you'll have
> teammates, former teammates, coaches, soigneurs, mechanics, etc on
> almost every single major team - even the Euro teams. Add to that
> industry sponsors, journalists, photogs etc. You get the point. Our
> whole lives are surrounded by the scene.
>
> Most USPROs will never read or post here because they just don't care
> and get enough of it in the daily routine. Other will simply lurk out
> of curiosity / boredom. A few are active posters. Some with real
> names and some with fake ones. Most of the stuff lately from the fake
> name pros is doping related because that's the ugly underbelly that has
> to be dealt with at every race. It's frustrating for the clean riders
> because there is still a core group that is getting away with it. The
> racers who have been around for awhile know the who's and why's.
> Despite the hype, it really is easy to dope here and get away with it.
>
> Problem is that it's all accusations and denials - so the clean guys
> lose both ways: in many of the races (esp. the stage races) and in the
> accusations. As has been said here many times, proof is hard to come
> by. So most don't say anything. No one has video of dopers filling up
> a vial of Eprex and injecting it into their stomachs.
>
> So anonymity is the only way to get some of this out there. Loss of
> anonymity means loss of leverage though. Being outed as a clean rider
> making accusations means exposing ones self to the dopers who are
> hiding behind their little secret - the dopers win again. It's really
> all stacked in their favor. I'm not complaining, it's simply the way
> it is at present.
>
> Also (not that you did this but just as another observation) using
> statements from retiring pros who say they "didn't see a problem with
> doping" in the US as an argument doesn't hold much water. They have
> nothing to gain by admitting there is a problem and everything to lose.
>
> So all I ask is that you give some of the anonymous posters here some
> benefit of the doubt. I think if you are a bit less dismissive of the
> anonymity you'll begin to see who is for real and who isn't. Take this
> for what it's worth but there are some serious insider truths here on
> rbr.
>
> -MC
>

I hear what you're saying, but the anonymity is a sword that cuts
both ways. It may decrease the risk of putting this stuff "out
there" but also decreases its credibility.
Considering the amount of verifyable [censored] out there, how is
someone NOT on the inside supposed to judge all the allegations? And
from what you're saying, the folks on the inside know all of this
anyway.
If you're saying it's just a frustrated primal scream, I can
understand it. But who in any position to do anything about this
cares what is written in rbr anyhow?

Steve

Good question. Because the people who know stuff say very specific
things. And you need to use your Jedi powers to guide you into
figuring out who is the real McDeal vs. the DARK SIDE pretenders.

According to your logic, Deep Throat's anonymity means Woodward and
Bernstein should return their Pulitzers.

I have a question for you dental twin, and I'd like you to really
level with me. Did you and bro ever pull a Dead Ringers on a hot
chick patient?

It's a legitimate question.

Bananas to you,

Magilla

Semi-serious answer--I never saw the movie, so I don't know, but I
doubt it.
However, we do re-enact the interrogation scene with Olivier and
Dustin Hoffman from "Marathon Man" every now and then.

It's very safe,
Steve

I like you Steve. You're alright.

Magilla

In article <Y7KRd.26147$ya6.4733@trndny01>,

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

However, we do re-enact the interrogation scene with Olivier and Dustin
Hoffman from "Marathon Man" every now and then.

It's very safe,
Steve

So which one of you gets to do the Sir Larry role, or do you trade off?

--
tanx,
Howard

Butter is love.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Howard Kveck said:

In article <Y7KRd.26147$ya6.4733@trndny01>,

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

However, we do re-enact the interrogation scene with Olivier and Dustin
Hoffman from "Marathon Man" every now and then.

It's very safe,
Steve

So which one of you gets to do the Sir Larry role, or do you trade off?

Oh, I don't do the Hoffman part.
He does call me "the evil twin"

Steve

--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

, I can understand

Quoted message said:

it. But who in any position to do anything about this cares what is
written in rbr anyhow?

B Lafferty said:

Ullrich does. He's still hurting from all of the fat jokes.

Unless of course he's become a buddhist.

Do they make lycra robes? I'd be worried that they might get caught in the
chain.

--
tanx,
Howard

Butter is love.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

, I can understand

Quoted message said:

it. But who in any position to do anything about this cares what is
written in rbr anyhow?

B Lafferty said:

Ullrich does. He's still hurting from all of the fat jokes.

Unless of course he's become a buddhist.

"Howard Kveck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

Donald Munro said:

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

, I can understand
> it. But who in any position to do anything about this cares what is
> written in rbr anyhow?

B Lafferty said:

Ullrich does. He's still hurting from all of the fat jokes.

Unless of course he's become a buddhist.

Do they make lycra robes? I'd be worried that they might get caught in the
chain.

This reminds me of something that occurred one year at the Pepsi 24 hour
race in NYC's Central Park. A group of cyclists entered the event from some
sort of meditative ashram and did quite well with virtually no real training
in cycling. Perhaps someone out there remembers the particulars of who the
were.

BTW, the best Buddhist cycling robes are a blend of Lycra and silk.

Mark & Steven Bornfeld said:

MagillaGorilla said:

I have a question for you dental twin, and I'd like you to really level
with me. Did you and bro ever pull a Dead Ringers on a hot chick
patient?

Semi-serious answer--I never saw the movie, so I don't know, but I
doubt it.

Oddly enough,
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=573&ncid=757&e=10&u=/nm/20050215/od_nm/odd_doctors_dc