Quoted message said:I was thinking along those lines. How many bog standard but serviceable
wheels can you get for £170?
Crikey, I feel an informed and helpful post coming on <faints>
If the OP wants 'em for touring then he _really_ doesn't want any
breakages. The extra peace of mind that a custom built wheel gives
certainly makes it worth consideration.
Haven't got a clue about rims, but shimano rear freewheel hubs I know
about. (always wondered about what you get for your money.
<URL:http://www.shimano-europe.com/cycling/> and looking through their
catalogue lays it all out.
For Shimano freewheel hubs they go up in price like this (wiggle prices):
Sora - £24.99 - 418g
Tiagra - £27.99 - 425g
105 - £39.99 - 348g or 411g*
Ultegra - £49.99 - 410g
Dura Ace - £90.24 - 376g
Sora is bog standard. 411g
Tiagra has better seals to stop grime getting in.
105 adds coated bearings to reduce friction. (105 bits interchangable
with Ultegra and Dura Ace bits, but we're only talking hubs here)
Ultegra doesn't seem to add anything here except for the name.
Dura Ace give you stainless steel bearings and is lighter.
Sora is perfectly adequate but...
....For three lousy quid more you get the better seals on the Tiagra.
Less dirt = longer life and less friction - go with it!
105 gives you coated bearings for another £12, but if bearings wear then
perhaps so will the coating?
Ultegra is a waste of £10.
Dura Ace is just a silly price. For touring £50 to save 35 grams seems
marginally excessive. Stainless steel bearings tho. Are these lighter?
More durable? What are the bearings in the other hubs made out of?
My vote would be for either the Tiagra if on a budget or the 105 if
someone else raves about borozon coatings and money's no problem. 105 it
is then. Or perhaps Ultegra if I've missed whatever makes it better.
*Shimano list two models with two weights. Something to do with flanges
or just a misprint?