If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear first and you would have to download the entire list of messages ever posted to a grooup to get the most recently posted message. This would take forever and it is obviouly a stupid way to proceed.
But why then do so many people prefer things to be that way?
"half_pint" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear first and you would have to download the entire list of messages ever posted to a grooup to get the most recently posted message. This would take forever and it is obviouly a stupid way to proceed.
But why then do so many people prefer things to be that way?
If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear first
I don't get this? The oldest message does appear first. What sort of newreader do you use that lists the newest message at the top of the thread and the older messages below it? Bizarre!
Next you'll be telling me that books should put the first page at the back. IIRC Japanese does have books that, to westerners, read back to front but thats related to the way they write. I wouldn't be surprised if other right to left languages - e.g. arabic - are the same.
Tim.
-- God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
No, when you download 100 message it is not the first 100 messages posted to the group but the last 100.
"Tim Woodall" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 23:11:26 -0000,
half_pint said:
If it was normal for the most recent message be at the end of the list then when you read a newsgroup the oldest message would appear first
I don't get this? The oldest message does appear first. What sort of newreader do you use that lists the newest message at the top of the thread and the older messages below it? Bizarre!
Next you'll be telling me that books should put the first page at the back. IIRC Japanese does have books that, to westerners, read back to front but thats related to the way they write. I wouldn't be surprised if other right to left languages - e.g. arabic - are the same.
Tim.
-- God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
The real proof bottom posting is stupid would probably be if half_wit started advocating it.
Guy -- "then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:06:42 -0000, "half_pint" <[email hidden]>
wrote in message : said:
No, when you download 100 message it is not the first 100 messages posted to the group but the last 100.
Or, in my case, all of them in sequence. After 4 days away, just over 400 messages. All of which had downloaded in their entirety by the time I'd made myself a cup of tea to drink while reading them.
What was your pointless again?
Guy -- "then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales