Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Conti sidewall issues

Started by Ollie · · Last activity · 9 posts · 914 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
10 June 2003
Last activity
11 June 2003
Original author
Ollie
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
914
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
    semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
    breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
    shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this problem. Any feedback
    on how they went? Cheers Ollie

  2. Ollie said:

    Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
    semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
    breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
    shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this problem. Any feedback
    on how they went?

    The Contis I'm running now show wear on the sidewalls, but it doesn't seem to be affecting their
    strength and/or longevity. The trick has always been to ride enough miles to wear out the tread
    before the sidewalls go south.

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

  3. "Ollie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
    semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
    breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
    shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this


    problem.

    Quoted message said:

    Any feedback on how they went? Cheers Ollie

    Nothing as such. I am riding Conti Vertical Pro 2.3 fifth pair and sixth is due in a week or two.
    They wear pretty fast but they are consistent in wear, no unusual damages to the tire. Like them a
    lot, same as few of my friends.

    D'amir

  4. Survival ProTection 2.3" (front) and a Survival Pro 2.1(rear), no problems

  5. Mark Hickey <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Ollie said:

    Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
    semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
    breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
    shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this problem. Any
    feedback on how they went?

    The Contis I'm running now show wear on the sidewalls, but it doesn't seem to be affecting their
    strength and/or longevity. The trick has always been to ride enough miles to wear out the tread
    before the sidewalls go south.

    Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.com Home of the $695 ti frame

    I've had problems with Michelin sidewalls, but not Contis. /s

  6. "ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Survival ProTection 2.3" (front) and a Survival Pro 2.1(rear), no problems

    What's the difference between the Pro and the Pro-Tection versions. I'm running vertical Pro 2.3
    front and rear. Did I the crappy version like the cheap Taiwan FIre XC Pro?

  7. "wanguard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Ollie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
    semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
    breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a
    bike shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this


    problem.

    Quoted message said:

    Any feedback on how they went? Cheers Ollie

    Nothing as such. I am riding Conti Vertical Pro 2.3 fifth pair and sixth is due in a week or two.
    They wear pretty fast but they are consistent in wear, no unusual damages to the tire. Like them a
    lot, same as few of my friends.

    They (Vertical Pro 2.3) are great on everything but hardpack and slickrock for me and have worn
    well. Very predictable tires.

    JD

  8. Bruce said:

    "ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Survival ProTection 2.3" (front) and a Survival Pro 2.1(rear), no problems

    What's the difference between the Pro and the Pro-Tection versions.

    Kevlar sidewalls

  9. "ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Bruce said:

    "ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What's the difference between the Pro and the Pro-Tection versions.

    Kevlar sidewalls


    Thanks!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.