Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this problem. Any feedback
on how they went? Cheers Ollie
Mountain Bikes · Public discussion
Conti sidewall issues
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Mountain Bikes
- Published
- 10 June 2003
- Last activity
- 11 June 2003
- Original author
- Ollie
- Posts
- 9
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 914
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Ollie said:
Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this problem. Any feedback
on how they went?The Contis I'm running now show wear on the sidewalls, but it doesn't seem to be affecting their
strength and/or longevity. The trick has always been to ride enough miles to wear out the tread
before the sidewalls go south.Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗ Home of the $695 ti frame
-
"Ollie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this
problem.Quoted message said:
Any feedback on how they went? Cheers Ollie
Nothing as such. I am riding Conti Vertical Pro 2.3 fifth pair and sixth is due in a week or two.
They wear pretty fast but they are consistent in wear, no unusual damages to the tire. Like them a
lot, same as few of my friends.D'amir
-
Survival ProTection 2.3" (front) and a Survival Pro 2.1(rear), no problems
-
Mark Hickey <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
Ollie said:
Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a bike
shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this problem. Any
feedback on how they went?The Contis I'm running now show wear on the sidewalls, but it doesn't seem to be affecting their
strength and/or longevity. The trick has always been to ride enough miles to wear out the tread
before the sidewalls go south.Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗ Home of the $695 ti frame
I've had problems with Michelin sidewalls, but not Contis. /s
-
"ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Survival ProTection 2.3" (front) and a Survival Pro 2.1(rear), no problemsWhat's the difference between the Pro and the Pro-Tection versions. I'm running vertical Pro 2.3
front and rear. Did I the crappy version like the cheap Taiwan FIre XC Pro? -
"wanguard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
"Ollie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Does anyone have any recent experience with conti's. I tried some a few years ago (a pair of
semi-slicks, and a pair of knobbies), and found that their side walls wore out very quickly,
breaking in several places before the tread had worn very mutch at all. I'm now working in a
bike shop which sells them and have noticed that they claim to have delt with this
problem.Quoted message said:
Any feedback on how they went? Cheers Ollie
Nothing as such. I am riding Conti Vertical Pro 2.3 fifth pair and sixth is due in a week or two.
They wear pretty fast but they are consistent in wear, no unusual damages to the tire. Like them a
lot, same as few of my friends.They (Vertical Pro 2.3) are great on everything but hardpack and slickrock for me and have worn
well. Very predictable tires.JD
-
Bruce said:
"ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Survival ProTection 2.3" (front) and a Survival Pro 2.1(rear), no problems
What's the difference between the Pro and the Pro-Tection versions.
Kevlar sidewalls
-
"ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Bruce said:
"ClydesdaleMTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
What's the difference between the Pro and the Pro-Tection versions.
Kevlar sidewalls
Thanks!
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.