I am on Atkins and am losing slowly which is good. Are these ratios ok for a few months or is the fat too high and the protein too low or maybe the carbs high..... Any help is appreciated.....
The protein and carbs are too high and the fat is too low. You might be able to get by with the ratios you are currently using for now, but when your progress stalls try adding fat and decreasing protein.
--
Eat less, exercise more. -- MFW
-- "warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
calories 1755 fat 119 carb 33 protein 150
I am on Atkins and am losing slowly which is good. Are these ratios ok for a few months or is the fat too high and the protein too low or maybe the carbs high..... Any help is appreciated.....
Because I have read some of your notes I really cant take anything you say seriously, can I?? Although a lurker and I just try to read people that have something to say and there seems to be a lot of controversy around you, I cant get a read on your intentions. That means I need to just let them pass...... I honestly cant say what the controversy about you is because I don't waste the time trying to figure it out. I know I speak for a lot of people in this case but when I read your notes I think either you are a troll or someone with a great sense of humor no one understands. Either way I'll listen if you want to explain... maybe I am wrong... And please don't make this into a flameout. I just want a simple answer...... Warren
JC Der Koenig said:
The protein and carbs are too high and the fat is too low. You might be able to get by with the ratios you are currently using for now, but when your progress stalls try adding fat and decreasing protein.
In this one case, I agree with JC. You may wish to google for the various online calculators for proper protein amounts. If you reduce protein to 75, then fat could be increased to make up the difference.
I'm not as patient as you are. I would try eating lower total calories per day. My personal goal is 1400 on average, but 1755 should give some slow weightloss. They always say slower loss is healthier and more likely to be maintained, but I don't recall any studies supporting it. My guess is that continuing LC as a way of life is more important than the rate at which the weight was lost.
"warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Because I have read some of your notes I really cant take anything you say seriously, can I?? Although a lurker and I just try to read people that have something to say and there seems to be a lot of controversy around you, I cant get a read on your intentions. That means I need to just let them pass...... I honestly cant say what the controversy about you is because I don't waste the time trying to figure it out. I know I speak for a lot of people in this case but when I read your notes I think either you are a troll or someone with a great sense of humor no one understands. Either way I'll listen if you want to explain... maybe I am wrong... And please don't make this into a flameout. I just want a simple answer...... Warren
JC Der Koenig said:
The protein and carbs are too high and the fat is too low. You might be able to get by with the ratios you are currently using for now, but when your progress stalls try adding fat and decreasing protein.
I'm am someone who knows how to reduce bodyfat using low carb, and have proven this many times. The controversy is that many people here would rather put their faith in magic rather than in proven methods.
Btw, several people understand my humor.
--
Eat less, exercise more. -- MFW
-- "warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Because I have read some of your notes I really cant take anything you say seriously, can I?? Although a lurker and I just try to read people that have something to say and there seems to be a lot of controversy around you, I cant get a read on your intentions. That means I need to just let them pass...... I honestly cant say what the controversy about you is because I don't waste the time trying to figure it out. I know I speak for a lot of people in this case but when I read your notes I think either you are a troll or someone with a great sense of humor no one understands. Either way I'll listen if you want to explain... maybe I am wrong... And please don't make this into a flameout. I just want a simple answer...... Warren
JC Der Koenig said:
The protein and carbs are too high and the fat is too low. You might be able to get by with the ratios you are currently using for now, but when your progress stalls try adding fat and decreasing protein.
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:51:43 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:52:05 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote: > I'm am someone who knows how to reduce bodyfat using low carb, and have > proven this many times.
Is that like Luna who gave up smoking many times? Just curious.
Is this the reason you haven't been able to gain any lean mass yet?
I simply decided not to.
Quoted message said:
You still don't believe in the efficacy of the bulking/cutting cycle?
I believe in its efficacy.
Quoted message said:
Are you really that ignorant, or just purposely obtuse?
I am trying out my sense of humor...
Your English is fairly good for a Russian immigrant.
His English is better than mine. He even uses idioms.
"JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:51:43 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:52:05 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> > wrote: >> I'm am someone who knows how to reduce bodyfat using low carb, and
have
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>> proven this many times. > > Is that like Luna who gave up smoking many times? Just curious. >
Is this the reason you haven't been able to gain any lean mass yet?
I simply decided not to.
Quoted message said:
You still don't believe in the efficacy of the bulking/cutting cycle?
I believe in its efficacy.
Quoted message said:
Are you really that ignorant, or just purposely obtuse?
I am trying out my sense of humor...
Your English is fairly good for a Russian immigrant.
-- "Cubit" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
His English is better than mine. He even uses idioms.
"JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:51:43 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote: > "Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in > message > news:[email hidden]... >> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:52:05 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> >> wrote: >>> I'm am someone who knows how to reduce bodyfat using low carb, and
have
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
>>> proven this many times. >> >> Is that like Luna who gave up smoking many times? Just curious. >> > > > Is this the reason you haven't been able to gain any lean mass yet?
I simply decided not to.
> You still don't believe in the efficacy of the bulking/cutting cycle?
I believe in its efficacy.
> Are you really that ignorant, or just purposely obtuse?
I am trying out my sense of humor...
Your English is fairly good for a Russian immigrant.
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Hm, thanks. My sense of humor though, could never develop into something understood by natives. Whenever I say a joke, someone gets upset!
i
Yeah. Remember the joking about the 50lb sack of wheat? I couldn't figure out why you were upset. I think facial expressions/body language are part of communication that can not be translated in a forum. In real life, it is easier to discern whether someone is joking or serious.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:24:09 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]>
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Tom said:
"Ignoramus31279" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Hm, thanks. My sense of humor though, could never develop into something understood by natives. Whenever I say a joke, someone gets upset!
i
Yeah. Remember the joking about the 50lb sack of wheat? I couldn't figure out why you were upset. I think facial expressions/body language
are
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
part of communication that can not be translated in a forum. In real
life,
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
it is easier to discern whether someone is joking or serious.
Yep. I personally feel that besides what you said, I am lacking the "cultural context". The funny cartoons that natives watched as kids, school stuff etc, was all different for me.
I don't have any sites that I can point to to back this up, but losing weight slowly (2 pounds/week or less) is easier on your entire body, specifically your organs. For example, you can develop fatty liver disease from too rapid weight loss and your skin needs time to keep up or you end up with that excess hanging skin thing I'm sure you've seen on some people.
Cubit said:
I'm not as patient as you are. I would try eating lower total calories per day. My personal goal is 1400 on average, but 1755 should give some slow weightloss. They always say slower loss is healthier and more likely to be maintained, but I don't recall any studies supporting it. My guess is that continuing LC as a way of life is more important than the rate at which the weight was lost.
"warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Because I have read some of your notes I really cant take anything you say seriously, can I?? Although a lurker and I just try to read people that have something to say and there seems to be a lot of controversy around you, I cant get a read on your intentions. That means I need to just let them pass...... I honestly cant say what the controversy about you is because I don't waste the time trying to figure it out. I know I speak for a lot of people in this case but when I read your notes I think either you are a troll or someone with a great sense of humor no one understands. Either way I'll listen if you want to explain... maybe I am wrong... And please don't make this into a flameout. I just want a simple answer...... Warren
JC Der Koenig said:
The protein and carbs are too high and the fat is too low. You might be able to get by with the ratios you are currently using for now, but when your progress stalls try adding fat and decreasing protein.
JC's real name is Jerry Seinfeld (he mistyped the JS). Because he's out of work now, he just posts here.
"warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Because I have read some of your notes I really cant take anything you say seriously, can I?? Although a lurker and I just try to read people that have something to say and there seems to be a lot of controversy around you, I cant get a read on your intentions. That means I need to just let them pass...... I honestly cant say what the controversy about you is because I don't waste the time trying to figure it out. I know I speak for a lot of people in this case but when I read your notes I think either you are a troll or someone with a great sense of humor no one understands. Either way I'll listen if you want to explain... maybe I am wrong... And please don't make this into a flameout. I just want a simple answer...... Warren
JC Der Koenig said:
The protein and carbs are too high and the fat is too low. You might be able to get by with the ratios you are currently using for now, but when your progress stalls try adding fat and decreasing protein.
I agree with JC. But watch what fats you get, for health purposes. Let's get away from such things as bacon and cheesecake, and go with omega 3 fats from tuna and salmon (and other fish), for instance.
"Luna" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
Ignoramus31279 said:
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:52:05 GMT, JC Der Koenig <[email hidden]> wrote: > I'm am someone who knows how to reduce bodyfat using low carb, and have > proven this many times.
Is that like Luna who gave up smoking many times? Just curious.
Hey, why you hurtin' on me? I wasn't even in here, I was asleep.
He didn't mean it, Michele. I'm still smoking, and there are damn few of us left. If you want one, here!
No thanks! I'm at 3 days now, and it's getting easier. I think Ig was picking on me because I've tried to quit and failed so many times before. But, hey, if it were easy, everyone would do it. And if I were a wimp, I wouldn't keep trying.
"warren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
calories 1755 fat 119 carb 33 protein 150
I am on Atkins and am losing slowly which is good. Are these ratios ok for a few months or is the fat too high and the protein too low or maybe the carbs high..... Any help is appreciated.....
Warren 193 now
In my opinion you don't need to keep such a close eye on all those figures. If you cut your carbs down to the level you're at, the numbers will take care of themselves. If you eat more protein one day, and more fat the next, it won't really make any difference as long as the carbs stay low. -- JK Sinrod Sinrod Stained Glass Studios www.sinrodstudios.com Coney Island Memories www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories