Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

seeking that ultimate tourer

Started by bentupright · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,088 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 December 2004
Last activity
10 December 2004
Original author
bentupright
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,088
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Well, I'm seriously looking for that serious touring frame, and I feel the need to comment on some observations made thus far.

    Has anyone seen the movie, To Live In L.A.? Steve Martin tries to get a table at the best restaurant in town, and after waiting a few months, the matre d'/ owner (played by Patrick Steward) tells him that, "You cannot have ze duck".:eek: Sorry gentlemen, but if the creme de la creme involves succumbing to INTJ's who think that they are so perfect in their discernment that they assume that all of their customers are shy introverts abused as children (and asking for MORE abuse🙁 ), then they can either practice the fine art of humility🙂 or take THEIR selves and THEIR bikes to pardition's eternal hot😄 . Besides, NORMAL entrepeneurs see the high demand, and expand production accordingly (without sacrifice in performance, thank you).

    With THAT said, I'm DEFINATELY down to Surly LHT and Trek 520, MAYBE Bruce Gordon BLT or Rock n' Road, and probably NOT Rivendell Atlantis (gee, I really wanted it lugged, but price WITH delays?!). I guess that my red blood most ALWAYS tramples over the blue bloods, and gotta settle for something good enough (even though not QUITE blissfully perfect 🙁 ).

    Thus far: One source CLAIMS that the Trek 520 is not CLEAR on it's choice of metal, ergo, you don't know how strong it really is. HOWEVER, with bicycle reviews giving MANY more reviews on the 520 over the others, must be good enough for SOMETHING! If THEY can tour on it, so can I, right?

    Surly LHT: GREAT response thus far. Personally, I don't feel like going through the rigamarole of finding that PERFECT hub and flange size, PERFECT wheel, PERFECT spokes, perfect bottom bracket assembly, perfect spoke number AND pattern (my limited knowledge on that thus far says that more spokes are better, get the one with 42 spoke 'tandem style' wheels, but others hint at staying with 36 spoke. I want to plan on weighing this sucker DOWN, IF necessary [probably NOT, buuut, nice to be there if I need it, and minimize spoke damage under ANY situation, and LAST ten-plus years without worry!]. Others made mention of hub limitations (number of spokes increase chance of flange damage, which SIZE of hub flange to consider for riding style: Bigger [hub flanges] is stiffer, but stiffer is racer not tourer, BUT big tires make up for stiffer [tire flex=adequate passive suspension]? Heck, I only WANT it strong for touring weights!). This is just a BIT too much for me to have to consider, unless someone wants to send me to 'Bicycle U' for a couple of years...

    I think that I can agree upon bar end shifters, or down-tube braze-on shifters with a couple of bar end shifters kept on standby, at least [thankfully, no big problem, there]. A wheel size AND a dropout/stay size that allows 35c-37c and up, WITH fenders, and dual pivot sidepull brakes that would fit that big 'mudda' of a tire (but if size (or the fenders??) restricts me to brakes, only THEN will my resistance [to cantilever brakes] be made futile. I like the Surly because it appears to be set up to allow me to try EITHER.)

    Another thing to consider here: My present Trek 1000 58cm size ONLY allows my TOES to reach the ground, and that's with speedplay shoes on. I consider this adequate for city stopping, but when I think of how high those 35c or 37c tires are probably going to send the same size frame (and ME!) off the ground, I got concerned over BB height for these bikes (that, or plan on frequent dismounting by jumping down off the seat, or SOMETHING, while LOADED??). The figures given between BB height on the Surly vs. my present 1000 are not even in the same BALLPARK, so I figure that someone has mis-sized their specs on THAT one (or I should plan on severely shortened cranks on it, I dunno).

    SOOO: Can anyone show me what THEY pieced a Surly together with (particularly the hub/flanges, brakes, spokes, wheels, cassette), and what it cost them for those parts? How about any unforseen building that a LBS MUST do (or I COULD, only by buying a grand's worth of tool parts, which I don't WANT to collect for a one-time thing). Do I want large hubs or small ones, and what's the advantage of either? I'll save the gearing issue for some other time😄 !

  2. bentupright said:

    Well, I'm seriously looking for that serious touring frame, and I feel the need to comment on some observations made thus far.

    Has anyone seen the movie, To Live In L.A.? Steve Martin tries to get a table at the best restaurant in town, and after waiting a few months, the matre d'/ owner (played by Patrick Steward) tells him that, "You cannot have ze duck".:eek: Sorry gentlemen, but if the creme de la creme involves succumbing to INTJ's who think that they are so perfect in their discernment that they assume that all of their customers are shy introverts abused as children (and asking for MORE abuse🙁 ), then they can either practice the fine art of humility🙂 or take THEIR selves and THEIR bikes to pardition's eternal hot😄 . Besides, NORMAL entrepeneurs see the high demand, and expand production accordingly (without sacrifice in performance, thank you).

    With THAT said, I'm DEFINATELY down to Surly LHT and Trek 520, MAYBE Bruce Gordon BLT or Rock n' Road, and probably NOT Rivendell Atlantis (gee, I really wanted it lugged, but price WITH delays?!). I guess that my red blood most ALWAYS tramples over the blue bloods, and gotta settle for something good enough (even though not QUITE blissfully perfect 🙁 ).

    Thus far: One source CLAIMS that the Trek 520 is not CLEAR on it's choice of metal, ergo, you don't know how strong it really is. HOWEVER, with bicycle reviews giving MANY more reviews on the 520 over the others, must be good enough for SOMETHING! If THEY can tour on it, so can I, right?

    Surly LHT: GREAT response thus far. Personally, I don't feel like going through the rigamarole of finding that PERFECT hub and flange size, PERFECT wheel, PERFECT spokes, perfect bottom bracket assembly, perfect spoke number AND pattern (my limited knowledge on that thus far says that more spokes are better, get the one with 42 spoke 'tandem style' wheels, but others hint at staying with 36 spoke. I want to plan on weighing this sucker DOWN, IF necessary [probably NOT, buuut, nice to be there if I need it, and minimize spoke damage under ANY situation, and LAST ten-plus years without worry!]. Others made mention of hub limitations (number of spokes increase chance of flange damage, which SIZE of hub flange to consider for riding style: Bigger [hub flanges] is stiffer, but stiffer is racer not tourer, BUT big tires make up for stiffer [tire flex=adequate passive suspension]? Heck, I only WANT it strong for touring weights!). This is just a BIT too much for me to have to consider, unless someone wants to send me to 'Bicycle U' for a couple of years...

    I think that I can agree upon bar end shifters, or down-tube braze-on shifters with a couple of bar end shifters kept on standby, at least [thankfully, no big problem, there]. A wheel size AND a dropout/stay size that allows 35c-37c and up, WITH fenders, and dual pivot sidepull brakes that would fit that big 'mudda' of a tire (but if size (or the fenders??) restricts me to brakes, only THEN will my resistance [to cantilever brakes] be made futile. I like the Surly because it appears to be set up to allow me to try EITHER.)

    Another thing to consider here: My present Trek 1000 58cm size ONLY allows my TOES to reach the ground, and that's with speedplay shoes on. I consider this adequate for city stopping, but when I think of how high those 35c or 37c tires are probably going to send the same size frame (and ME!) off the ground, I got concerned over BB height for these bikes (that, or plan on frequent dismounting by jumping down off the seat, or SOMETHING, while LOADED??). The figures given between BB height on the Surly vs. my present 1000 are not even in the same BALLPARK, so I figure that someone has mis-sized their specs on THAT one (or I should plan on severely shortened cranks on it, I dunno).

    SOOO: Can anyone show me what THEY pieced a Surly together with (particularly the hub/flanges, brakes, spokes, wheels, cassette), and what it cost them for those parts? How about any unforseen building that a LBS MUST do (or I COULD, only by buying a grand's worth of tool parts, which I don't WANT to collect for a one-time thing). Do I want large hubs or small ones, and what's the advantage of either? I'll save the gearing issue for some other time😄 !

    I built a pair of wheels for one of these.
    Shimano M760 XT 36 spoke 3X with Sapim Race 14/15 DB Spokes and Velocity Synergy rims (Asym rear). They are very strong without being overly heavy. The rider uses Shimano M760 14 - 34 9 speed cassette and Avid 15C cantilever brakes with KoolStop Salmon pads. This combination works very well from him to the point that he took off for a tour of Australia and New Zealand.

    Standard but very tough flanges on these hubs make them siuitable for handling varied situations without having anything so exotic that you can't easily find replacement/maintenance/repair parts. Seals on Shimano MTB hubs are very hard to beat. They are most effective I have ever found. Standard spoke lengths and spoke support angles make the spokes more durable and should you need a replacement,,,... easier to find.

  3. I noticed that you had not considered a Giant touring bike, I think you should. It's a beefy frame. Also, It comes with disc brake mounts, something to considere if your going to load yourself down a lot, thats kinda nice. I like the little extra spoke and nipple carier that is built into the rear chainstay, kinda handy. The sloaping frame is going to be stiff, and also, with the big tires that you'll have on it, you wont have to worry about racking yourself when you hop off. It has lots of mounts for racks, and you can really load it up heavy. Only thing I can think of as a negative, is that it only comes in grey, thats the only one that I know of. Other than that, its a really nice touring bike that doesnt cost a fortune.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.