UK and Europe · Public discussion

record sprint refurbishment continued

Started by ccc rider · · Last activity · 5 posts · 368 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
24 November 2004
Last activity
29 November 2004
Original author
ccc rider
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
368
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. So ...

    a few months ago, starting with an '86 Record Sprint all-original
    parts and zero knowledge apart from fixing a puncture, I now have on
    the bike:

    - Pete Biggs's special (minus shifters) Campagnolo Mirage Ergo levers

    - 2nd hand Campagnolo Veloce brakes

    - 'new' old-stock Suntour down-shifters for those friction changes

    - a cold-set frame from 126mm to 130mm

    - (ready to put on) a newly built wheel by me on the excellent
    Cambridge course advertised on uk.rec.cycling recently (36x3 Mavic
    Open Pro, Shimano Ultegra hub, DT Competition spokes - bit OTT for
    this bike but I'm getting a new frame currently favouring MSteel
    Cycles hopefully Spring 2005 so I'll transfer it over)

    But now what ...

    Obviously, I need to get a new chain once I've chosen my cassette
    (SRAM/Shimano not sure but this newsgroup might not be the right place
    for that discussion) but ...

    In a previous set of postings, I get the feeling that the derailleur
    capacity is OK for my little upgrade so that can be left alone.

    I had a new bottom bracket put on before I realised the implications
    of changing from 6 speed to 8/9 speed and chain line. Not much
    preparation there!

    Also, now I examine properly, the chainrings (52-42) are bloody awful.
    Some of the teeth look they've been in a brawl and are half missing!
    My 'cassette' is 14-24. It's a really pedestrian setup compared to
    modern road bikes! I'm nearly always in 42x16 on flat roads but I'm so
    unfit the 42x24 is not easy on even those little inclines in Richmond
    Park!

    I check Sheldon Brown's website
    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_bo-z.html#bcd about cranks in order
    to investigate new chain ring possibilities whilst keeping to the
    existing bottom bracket and crank.

    I measured the spider's C-C to be ~65mm so BCD is 110mm perhaps:
    "Touring double, standard triple outer". Hmmm, anyone else have a
    similar old bike with cranks to verify this? I think it's right
    though.

    Oh well, modern, double chainwheel sets seem to use 130mm.

    Any advice? Any spares to throw my way? It seems like I need to search
    for 2nd hand or old parts for new chainrings. Or should I just get an
    all-new chainset? What would be the best idea?

    Cheers!

    ccc r

  2. [email hidden] (ccc rider) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    I measured the spider's C-C to be ~65mm so BCD is 110mm perhaps:
    "Touring double, standard triple outer". Hmmm, anyone else have a
    similar old bike with cranks to verify this? I think it's right
    though.

    Oh well, modern, double chainwheel sets seem to use 130mm.

    Any advice? Any spares to throw my way? It seems like I need to search
    for 2nd hand or old parts for new chainrings. Or should I just get an
    all-new chainset? What would be the best idea?

    The following might be of help (found via Google - until now I didn't
    know that a TA website existed) re. chainrings; pity it isn't a
    full-size diagram, though:

    http://www.specialites-ta.com/conseils_tech/montage_plateaux_gb.gif

    David E. Belcher

  3. in message <[email hidden]>, ccc rider

    (') said:

    So ...

    a few months ago, starting with an '86 Record Sprint all-original
    parts and zero knowledge apart from fixing a puncture, I now have on
    the bike:

    [snip]

    Quoted message said:

    But now what ...

    Obviously, I need to get a new chain once I've chosen my cassette
    (SRAM/Shimano not sure but this newsgroup might not be the right place
    for that discussion) but ...

    If nine speed or less use a SRAM one with the SRAM magic joining link.
    Far better than any of the other magic joining links and streets ahead
    of the fancy Shimano break-off-pin jobs which are not reusable.

    Quoted message said:

    Also, now I examine properly, the chainrings (52-42) are bloody awful.
    Some of the teeth look they've been in a brawl and are half missing!

    The chainset on my Record Sprint is also bloody awful. Probably, after
    the brakes, the worst of the original components. However, it has done
    twelve years and it's still there. In due course it will get the
    Centaur one off the Dolan when the Dolan gets either a carbon one or a
    TA Vega Light.

    Quoted message said:

    My 'cassette' is 14-24. It's a really pedestrian setup compared to
    modern road bikes! I'm nearly always in 42x16 on flat roads but I'm so
    unfit the 42x24 is not easy on even those little inclines in Richmond
    Park!

    I check Sheldon Brown's website
    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_bo-z.html#bcd about cranks in order
    to investigate new chain ring possibilities whilst keeping to the
    existing bottom bracket and crank.

    Don't. The spider on the cranks (at least on mine) is pressed steel with
    a little plastic cover to make it look as if it's alloy, and it flexes
    like a very flexible thing. Get a whole new crankset. You really will
    not regret it.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
    ;; If Python is executable pseudocode,
    ;; then Perl is executable line noise
    -- seen on Slashdot.

  4. Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:


    Don't. The spider on the cranks (at least on mine) is pressed steel with
    a little plastic cover to make it look as if it's alloy, and it flexes
    like a very flexible thing. Get a whole new crankset. You really will
    not regret it.

    Earlier Record Sprints (the OP said ~1986 for theirs, so definitely
    falls into this category) had a reasonable Sugino GT alloy chainset
    with replaceable rings (110mm PCD, I think), so I guess they *could*
    stick with the original chainset and just get some new rings
    (Stronglight ones are fairly cheap). I'd ditch the original BB for a
    cartridge one, though, as from memory the Record Sprint BB was a cup
    'n' balls job with no seals.

    David E. Belcher

  5. David E. Belcher said:

    Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Don't. The spider on the cranks (at least on mine) is pressed steel with
    a little plastic cover to make it look as if it's alloy, and it flexes
    like a very flexible thing. Get a whole new crankset. You really will
    not regret it.

    Earlier Record Sprints (the OP said ~1986 for theirs, so definitely
    falls into this category) had a reasonable Sugino GT alloy chainset
    with replaceable rings (110mm PCD, I think), so I guess they *could*
    stick with the original chainset and just get some new rings
    (Stronglight ones are fairly cheap). I'd ditch the original BB for a
    cartridge one, though, as from memory the Record Sprint BB was a cup
    'n' balls job with no seals.

    David E. Belcher

    Sugino GT is 110mm PCD, I have one from my 1986 Royal. Until August 2004
    it was in use and I would agree it is reasonable. I have since changed
    the bike to a triple (1987Deore) but utilised the original 50 toothed
    ring, the 36 is servicable but currently an unneeded size.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.