Saffire said:
Michael (aka Archon for you newbies), you have expressed on numerous occasions
your preference for very lean, muscular, athletic women. Nothing wrong with that
preference
but you have a tendency to pronounce YOUR image of an ideal female
body type as THE ideal and seem to consider any woman whose body type does NOT
match that ideal to be "defective".
You overestimate the importance of fitting into what I consider the
ideal. It's not like I go "[censored] off" to people who doesn't. At most when
I see those flabby tummys hanging out from the light clothing I think
well, maybe you shouldn't be wearing that britney spears outfit, or if
they look like a walking heart attack waiting to happen, I think
something went really wrong some time during that life.
And when I see a lean one with a well toned and balanced muscle
definition (unlike skinny bodies with flat muscles hanging on the wrong
side of the arm or when it's just a sketeton) I think it is artistic and
inspiring. The same with bruce lee movies e.g. when he fought Chuck
Norris and he was warming up all his muscles and you could see how all
the muscles interacted and in "Hero" with Jet Li, where tehy undress him
to search him for weapons, you could see the muscle definition spread
evenly all over the body. Fascinating. I wish I had the determination
and drive to achieve that. I often go straight from watching a movie
like that to the workout room. Same thing with figure skating, I go for
a 2 hour skate and then to the workout room!
Quoted message said:That can be off-putting to women, especially
since it is not very realistic for the majority of them, especially once they are
out of their teens or twenties, no matter HOW hard they work at it. Unless
someone specifically ASKS for CRITIQUES of their fitness level and body fat
percentage, it's probably better not to comment on that aspect.
I ususally don't as far I know. I used to, though. And in this case, I
believe I did not comment in more detail than was asked for.
Quoted message said:It takes courage
to post before, during and after photos. If we need to lose more fat or
strengthen muscles, we already KNOW it and don't need to be told so -- that just
sticks a pin in our bubble, shakes our self-confidence and takes away from our
accomplishments so far. Since MOST women cannot match (or maintain) YOUR ideal
of a female body type, you are essentially telling them that their body isn't
good enough, no matter HOW much weight they've lost. You may THINK "chubby but
sexy" is a compliment, but it's NOT. It's saying "you'll do, but you're
defective".
My meaning was that women does not need to be optimal to be attractive,
because it seems people think I only like skinny, and nothing else will
do. Balance is more important: skinny arms, legs, face and a big chubby
stomach looks bad. An even distribution of a 1 inch layer of fat looks
much better, if it is a somewhat largely built person. (a 5' thin-boned
lady wouldn't look good with 1 inch fat). However, a good motivation for
women not to have a layer of fat, is that they won't have orange peel
skin on their size at age 20 🙂 And it si very likely they will gain
some at 40 or after giving birth, so if they've spend their entire
buffer before that, they'll get chunky when that happens.
Quoted message said:Part of it is a "men are from Mars, women are from Venus" communication thing.
Consider this a constructive critique of your style when it comes to
communicating with women -- it will serve you well in the long run. You don't
have to give us false compliments, but it's not necessary to point out perceived
flaws.
I once had a girlfriend who specifically asked me to give false
compliments... I refused.
But I do see fat gain as an indication that something is wrong, may it
be a starting depression, loss of selfesteem, stress, or other things.